Jump to content

Did we dump the 3-3-5 for good?


UNT86

Recommended Posts

Just now, UNT86 said:

We didn't run the 3-3-5 a single play tonight.  We were primarily in a 3-4 front. Lots of man in the secondary.  We did run some nickel, but it was 4-2-5 with the extra DB being an extra corner.

 

And we finally stopped the run. Coincidence?  I think not.

 

Don't know who made the change, but it gives me hope.

Good eye noticed that as well.  Caponi is living on borrowed time it appears.

  • Upvote 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, UNT86 said:

We didn't run the 3-3-5 a single play tonight.  We were primarily in a 3-4 front. Lots of man in the secondary.  We did run some nickel, but it was 4-2-5 with the extra DB being an extra corner.

 

And we finally stopped the run. Coincidence?  I think not.

 

Don't know who made the change, but it gives me hope.

If I'm not mistaken, didn't Odom run the 3-4?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It appears we did. 

5 hours ago, peanuts104 said:

If I'm not mistaken, didn't Odom run the 3-4?

Maybe Odum is the new guy running the D and we have reassigned Caponi. I don't know any of that, but the D looked a lot better playing 3-4 than they did playing 3-3-5. I don't know who made the change, but it was for the better. If we continue with that look, the guys should get much better as they get more comfortable in that scheme.

  • Upvote 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Hunter Green said:

Morris stated in his post game interview that it was agreed upon that they would put their best eleven men on defense. Depth at LB dictated that.

I think the flow of the game impacted those rush numbers also.  It would have been very interesting if Wyoming didn't kill their first drive of the second half with a big loss on a fumbled snap.  They followed that up with a punt that might as well been a turnover, field position wise.  And offense kept the pressure on by scoring. 

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Meangreen Fight said:

I think the flow of the game impacted those rush numbers also.  It would have been very interesting if Wyoming didn't kill their first drive of the second half with a big loss on a fumbled snap.  They followed that up with a punt that might as well been a turnover, field position wise.  And offense kept the pressure on by scoring. 

Regardless of the"flow"... The defense held them to about 50 yards in the second half last night...

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Please review our full Privacy Policy before using our site.