Jump to content

Could the AAC Expand to 16 Teams? Commissioner Pernetti's Talks with Air Force Hint at a Bold Vision for the Future


C Rod

Recommended Posts

Today's YahooSports article from Ross Dellenger contains a sentence that jumped off the screen when I read it, and it's worth discussing. 

Quote

"If he loses teams or not, commissioner Tim Pernetti may bring into the league Air Force, a school that he's been in serious negotiations with for more than a week." 

Up to this point, I thought the discussions with Air Force were to replace a departing member like Memphis; however, from the quote above and how quickly he engaged with AF, Pernetti seems open to expanding the AAC beyond the current 14 football schools. 

Does Pernetti have a vision for a 15 or 16-team AAC? 

If the answer is yes, seeing how conferences typically like to keep things equal, a 16-team league seems more attractive, with eight teams in the East and eight in the West. 

WEST: Air Force, Tulsa, UNT, UTSA, Rice, Tulane, Memphis, UAB

EAST: Army, Temple, Navy, Charlotte, ECU, USF, FAU, and a SunBelt school like Liberty, App State, or Georgia State with the Atlanta market? 

Divisions like this would tighten the travel footprint for all sports, saving everyone money.

What do y'all think? 

Screenshot 2024-09-20 at 11.05.54 AM.png

  • Upvote 2
  • Skeptical Eagle 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm sure some are thinking, but 16 members are too many mouths to feed, and there needs to be more TV dollars to distribute to new members. 

Tim Pernetti has been vocal about bringing in additional revenue streams for conference members like private equity, league naming sponsorship deals, and corporate jersey patches like the NBA has implemented in recent years. 

In the near future, I expect all CFB conferences to negotiate naming rights like we currently do with stadiums and arenas. The American Athletic Conference could soon become the American Airlines Conference. Memphis jerseys will soon have FEDEX logos on them and so on.

https://www.espn.com/college-football/story/_/id/40342941/sources-big-12-explores-selling-naming-rights-title-sponsor

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, C Rod said:

Today's YahooSports article from Ross Dellenger contains a sentence that jumped off the screen when I read it, and it's worth discussing. 

Up to this point, I thought the discussions with Air Force were to replace a departing member like Memphis; however, from the quote above and how quickly he engaged with AF, Pernetti seems open to expanding the AAC beyond the current 14 football schools. 

Does Pernetti have a vision for a 15 or 16-team AAC? 

If the answer is yes, seeing how conferences typically like to keep things equal, a 16-team league seems more attractive, with eight teams in the East and eight in the West. 

WEST: Air Force, Tulsa, UNT, UTSA, Rice, Tulane, Memphis, UAB

EAST: Army, Temple, Navy, Charlotte, ECU, USF, FAU, and a SunBelt school like Liberty, App State, or Georgia State with the Atlanta market? 

Divisions like this would tighten the travel footprint for all sports, saving everyone money.

What do y'all think? 

Screenshot 2024-09-20 at 11.05.54 AM.png

Conferences are dropping divisions.  I think the SunBelt is the only one now with divisions.  
It’s better to have a core of rivals or natural geographic conference opponents, then rotate thru the rest. 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, NT80 said:

Conferences are dropping divisions.  I think the SunBelt is the only one now with divisions.  
It’s better to have a core of rivals or natural geographic conference opponents, then rotate thru the rest. 

Yeah I remember Mike Aresco talking about this couple years back. I’m curious if this will last though as we enter into the era of super-conferences. 

Edited by C Rod
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let's assume the PAC 6 snags Memphis, Tulane, and UTSA. Hopefully we could replace them with AFA and TSU. The AAC need not go wild and crazy adding teams that bring no media value to the conference. When the conference media rights contract is renegotiated we are going to take a hit. Plus someone must pay the MWC $17 million exit fee to get the AFA and any other team  from their conference.

  • Confused 1
  • Eye Roll 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

With this report that came out last Friday, talks with the AAC 4 might be stalling due to financial concerns. If we are able to retain Memphis, USF, Tulane, and UTSA for now, I'd still go after Air Force and even a James Madison. Perhaps some A-10 schools to add some Eastern non-football members and strengthen our league in basketball.

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Matt from A700 said:

With this report that came out last Friday, talks with the AAC 4 might be stalling due to financial concerns. If we are able to retain Memphis, USF, Tulane, and UTSA for now, I'd still go after Air Force and even a James Madison. Perhaps some A-10 schools to add some Eastern non-football members and strengthen our league in basketball.

I was just reading this article from McMurphy and thinking the same. Glad to see AF is behind UNLV and Utah St in priority. 
 

PAC is already paying MWC $110+ million for 4 schools. Poaching two more would cost an additional $55+ million. Sheesh, $165+ million for 6 MWC schools is wild without a confirmed TV deal. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its just a matter of time before memphis, tulane, and USF jump ship.  I'm sure the AAC is aware.  Whether they leave now or later, we should be expanding with the expectation of this happening.

I am extremely skeptical that UTSA is really on the radar of the newpac, but if so, we need to get TSU in here.  I honestly hope they do take UTSA, if that means we can bring in TSU that is a net positive as far as im concerned.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, C Rod said:

I was just reading this article from McMurphy and thinking the same. Glad to see AF is behind UNLV and Utah St in priority. 
 

PAC is already paying MWC $110+ million for 4 schools. Poaching two more would cost an additional $55+ million. Sheesh, $165+ million for 6 MWC schools is wild without a confirmed TV deal. 

The last reported media deal for the Pac-8 before everyone jumped ship was $23 million per school. I'm not convinced these six teams, the AAC 4, and possibly UNLV and USU get you half of that, especialy when there'd me more schools to spread the payout between.

Would be hilarious for it to fall apart with a mediocre TV deal and the conference doesn't even reach the 8-team FBS threshold by July 2026. Then the AAC comes in to save the day sweeping up the PAC 6.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No way UTSA has the money to pay a $27.5M exit fee. I can’t imagine any of the AAC school presidents willing to pay this much to leave for a conference without a TV deal in hand. 

If the PAC offers to pay the exit fee for Memphis and Tulane, they’ll have to shell out $55M, and if they want Memphis, Tulane, USF, and UTSA it jumps to $110M.

A scenario where the PAC has to tuck its tail between its legs and invite only UNLV and Utah State and stay at 8 schools is looking more likely by the day. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Tell a friend

    Love GoMeanGreen.com? Tell a friend!
  • What's going on Mean Green?

    1. 22

      Did we dump the 3-3-5 for good?

    2. 19

      3-1

    3. 19

      3-1

    4. 18

      Could the AAC Expand to 16 Teams? Commissioner Pernetti's Talks with Air Force Hint at a Bold Vision for the Future

    5. 5

      Mackenzie McGill

  • Popular Contributors

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      15,439
    • Most Online
      1,865

    Newest Member
    Mikee
    Joined
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Please review our full Privacy Policy before using our site.