PAC is back

[Matt from A700]

On 1/17/2025 at 8:36 PM, UNTLifer said:

Then why not stay put?

Because from top to bottom the Pac 12 offers opponents of interest. Kick out weaklings Rice and Tulsa, and then your interdivision opponents like SDSU, Boise, Gonzaga, Fresno, Wazzou, OSU all garner more attention than UAB, FAU, Charlotte...

[greenminer]

23 hours ago, MCMLXXX said:

I can't find this actual tweet.  Great screen grab to capture it, but if McMurphy deleted it then I think he is reading the room and holding off until he sees more substance.

[DallasGreen]

On 9/12/2024 at 10:52 AM, DentonStang said:

Why would Cal and Stanford take something like an 80% revenue cut to go to a non-P4 league. That's bananas.

Why would SMU give up nine years of tv revenue to get into a conference that is barely P5 and has the two most noteworthy members ( Clemson & FSU) trying to leave? They have sure not upgraded their ooc schedule by playing Houston Christian and East Texas A& M

[DentonStang]

5 hours ago, DallasGreen said:

Why would SMU give up nine years of tv revenue to get into a conference that is barely P5 and has the two most noteworthy members ( Clemson & FSU) trying to leave? They have sure not upgraded their ooc schedule by playing Houston Christian and East Texas A& M

Sorry, I'll have to respond in detail in a few weeks. I'm a little busy counting our ancillary non-tier I media revenue that still far exceeds our total AAC revenue, and planning where to park for our multiple sellouts, and best fent-free nose candy source for our likely homecoming game vs Miami.