You can post now and register later.
If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.
CW is owned by Paramount. I don't know exact details of Paramount but it's a relatively new company that stems from a Viacom and CBS merger. CW has a streaming app and is looking for sports content. So is Amazon and so is Apple TV. There will be bids as the other major conferences are set for the next 5+ years. Also worth noting the current MWC deal is with CBS and Fox which has been at about $5 mil per school and expires when the new PAC is starts. This means they'll also be looking to fill some content and could buy a few games.
And understood on your stance on the PAC. Obviously it has to all make sense financially. My concern is the top AAC schools will leave to the ACC when that collapses. I doubt we'll be included with SMU already being there. Then we're in CUSA 2.0. This is an opportunity to get out before that happens. We'll see how this plays out.
Army and Navy being FB only means they don't get a full share, they get 70%. Navy's is split with WSU, who gets 30%, and Army gets 70% of SMU's share. I'm not sure where the left over 30% goes.
$10-15M possible? Yes. Likely? I have doubts, mostly because will a network be willing to pay $80-$150M a year depending on the number of teams? ESPN and FOX seem to have their late night slots covered, would they bid for it? Does a network like the CW have that kind of money?
Also maybe I'm reading it wrong, but it feels like multiple people think I'm saying turn any kind of interest for the PAC down immediately. I said in multiple posts that if we get interest from the PAC we should definitely take a look, run the numbers and weigh the options. If the deal is good go, if not stay in the AAC. My personal opinion/speculation is skeptical that the numbers are there, but I'm not saying we should be closed off to the idea.
If you have enough stats go a certain way that's a trend, and SL's trend was never being able to make it over the hump. Close a few times, but couldn't put it all together. No one wants to go backwards, but that's on the AD to make the right choices.
Looks like a combination of being outplayed, mismatched in size, and a potential mistake to make this an easy TD.
One of our two biggest guys up front #15(302lb) got easily bumped and pushed inside by a similar size RT (outplayed).
The other #10(290lb) got double teamed by the 300lb center and 305lb LG who then walled off any back side help. (outsized/outnumbered)
Then #32, a 240lb SO LB got manhandled by a 295lb SR guard. (outsized/outplayed)
Pretty much all they had to do after that was block #21 who was attacking the runner since #4 was already being taken care of downfield. (outsized/outplayed)
For those that know DB assignments better...did #14 commit too early? (mistake?)
Was he supposed to help outside?
I don't know if #24 played it correctly
The other 4 (#9,#36,#2,#??) weren't involved in the play as it went outside to the right, away from them.
We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Please review our full Privacy Policy before using our site.
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.