Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I heard this during the NFL Draft over the weekend: Only 58 underclassmen declared for this year's draft, the lowest since 2011.

https://www.acmepackingcompany.com/2024/1/19/24044307/2024-nfl-draft-fewest-underclassmen-declare-in-over-a-decade

This is way down from a peak of 130 in 2021. The chance to earn serious NIL money in college is keeping more athletes from shortening their college careers.

One pundit said this trend meant there were a lot fewer NFL-ready players available during the final day of the draft. I don't know if that's true since the team here in Jacksonville has a long tradition of avoiding NFL-ready players.

  • Upvote 3
  • Haha 1
  • Puking Eagle 1
Posted

I didn’t give you the barf, but it’s unbelievable that people are staying in college to make more money.  Isn’t the purpose of college to be able to get a job and make more money?  It’s just insane.  

  • Eye Roll 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, NT93 said:

I didn’t give you the barf, but it’s unbelievable that people are staying in college to make more money.  Isn’t the purpose of college to be able to get a job and make more money?  It’s just insane.  

Yes, but they won't make the same amount of cash with that degree in "General Studies".

Posted
19 minutes ago, NT93 said:

I didn’t give you the barf, but it’s unbelievable that people are staying in college to make more money.  Isn’t the purpose of college to be able to get a job and make more money?  It’s just insane.  

Athletes are the only college students who had to overcome a presumption that it's wrong for them to make money while in school. Everyone else -- like the dot-com types -- didn't have the NCAA blocking them from income. When I was in college in the 1980s, Michael Dell was running a computer business out of his dorm room at UT-Austin. He made $200,000 profit his first year.

I don't think it's insane for college athletes to want some of that sweet green cheese. A lot of them won't make the NFL or will only be there for a short time on cheap rookie deals. When the money truck arrived on campus of course everybody got in line.

  • Upvote 2
  • Downvote 2
Posted

Does the NCAA still have any academic eligibility requirements anymore? Do these student athletes still have to pass a certain number of hours? How does that apply to grad transfers? Do they have to take /pass a certain number of hours? 

  • Upvote 2
Posted
1 minute ago, Shark84 said:

Does the NCAA still have any academic eligibility requirements anymore? Do these student athletes still have to pass a certain number of hours? How does that apply to grad transfers? Do they have to take /pass a certain number of hours? 

The rigor of collegiate academics aren't your daddies standard academics. Some places are said to be comparable to a good high school academics or that of your local community college. 

And that's just for the normal Joe blow students. Imagine being an athlete. 

  • Upvote 2
Posted
21 minutes ago, Shark84 said:

Does the NCAA still have any academic eligibility requirements anymore?

Yes. You must take at least 12 credit hours a semester and pass 9 credit hours with a 1.8 GPA (year 2), 1.9 GPA (year 3) or 2.0 GPA (year 4-5). Or someone who looks like you and can fake your signature must meet those requirements.

  • Upvote 1
  • Haha 1
  • Puking Eagle 1
Posted (edited)
5 hours ago, rcade said:

I don't think it's insane for college athletes to want some of that sweet green cheese. A lot of them won't make the NFL or will only be there for a short time on cheap rookie deals. When the money truck arrived on campus of course everybody got in line.

What I think is insane is just the way things have turned, not that kids want a part of it.  My goal when I started college was to get out as soon as I could.  Now kids are going to take a pay cut when they graduate.  That’s crazy.  I don’t blame the kids though.  I blame the system.

Edited by NT93
Posted
2 hours ago, NT93 said:

What I think is insane is just the way things have turned, not that kids want a part of it.  My goal when I started college was to get out as soon as could.  Now kids are going to take a pay cut when they graduate.  That’s crazy.  I don’t blame the kids though.  I blame the system.

I am glad the athletes are making money but there has to be a better way to do it. The current NIL and transfer portal are bonkers. They're taking a jackhammer to the foundation of the sport.

  • Upvote 1
  • Puking Eagle 1
Posted
24 minutes ago, rcade said:

I am glad the athletes are making money but there has to be a better way to do it. The current NIL and transfer portal are bonkers. They're taking a jackhammer to the foundation of the sport.

I completely agree with the last two sentences.  The first one?  Maybe, maybe not.  I wouldn’t say I’m “glad” that the athletes are making money, but I definitely wouldn’t mind them making money via a true and legitimate NIL.  

  • Upvote 1
Posted
1 hour ago, rcade said:

I am glad the athletes are making money but there has to be a better way to do it. The current NIL and transfer portal are bonkers. They're taking a jackhammer to the foundation of the sport.

You are correct. But the problem is that the SEC and the Big 10 have all the power and the current system only benefits them as it allows them to funnel all of the talent from the less funded schools. The Power 2 have the money to retain all their own talent and can take whatever they want from us. They aren’t going to change this system voluntarily.

Posted
2 minutes ago, MeanGreenZen said:

You are correct. But the problem is that the SEC and the Big 10 have all the power and the current system only benefits them as it allows them to funnel all of the talent from the less funded schools. The Power 2 have the money to retain all their own talent and can take whatever they want from us. They aren’t going to change this system voluntarily.

Especially when the wealthy alumni are paying the salaries and it costs the schools nothing.  Why would they ever want that to change?

Posted

Playing college football is not employment, but they do get free education for their participation.  Band members, team managers and cheerleaders don't get that.   

This demand for pay and constant roster turnover is driving fans away.  The players have killed their own hall of fame invites.

  • Upvote 1
Posted
11 hours ago, rcade said:

Athletes are the only college students who had to overcome a presumption that it's wrong for them to make money while in school. Everyone else -- like the dot-com types -- didn't have the NCAA blocking them from income. When I was in college in the 1980s, Michael Dell was running a computer business out of his dorm room at UT-Austin. He made $200,000 profit his first year.

I don't think it's insane for college athletes to want some of that sweet green cheese. A lot of them won't make the NFL or will only be there for a short time on cheap rookie deals. When the money truck arrived on campus of course everybody got in line.

Preface: I am not opposed to NIL as originally intended (signatures, video game royalties, etc) but absolutely hate the collectives-based cheating. 

Your analogy doesn’t quite work, however, as Dell (or pretty much any other student making money) isn’t being subsidized by the university up front. And I don’t mean the scholarships for athletes, I mean the brand, equipment, facilities, transportation, meals, training, medical, and everything else that the university- and by extension, donors and taxpayers- provides to them in order for their name, image, and likeness to matter. The university profits from this, of course, but football players are not just comparable to everyday students, even those who have scholarships or fellowships. Again, not opposed to NIL in theory but the comparison wasn’t quite equal. 

  • Upvote 1
Posted (edited)
21 hours ago, Shark84 said:

Does the NCAA still have any academic eligibility requirements anymore? Do these student athletes still have to pass a certain number of hours? How does that apply to grad transfers? Do they have to take /pass a certain number of hours? 

Kentucky just had to back off a football player they really wanted because he didn't have enough transferrable hours. 

Both the NCAA and NAIA will dock you for taking a transfer who doesn't meet your requirements for regular transfers. It is the one place where athletes are treated exactly like other students.

People whiz and moan about the higher NCAA admission standards for athletes. Out of 134 schools in FBS only about 5 will unconditionally admit a regular student who only meets the NCAA initial eligibility standard. Liberty, ULM, Jacksonville State, and I think Sam Houston. Not looked at Delaware.

The NAIA has the right rule. If kid meets the standard applied for unconditional admission at your school, he's eligible. If he doesn't he's got to sit a year and pass like 24 hours with a 2.0 GPA or better.

Edited by Arkstfan
Posted

Transfer every year if you want, but it should be 4 years to play (make money) 4 years.  No red-shirt year, no waivers, no appeals, no exceptions (there, I just got rid of an entire corrupt NCAA process).  Injured and can't play, though break...get used to it, life is full of them.  

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Please review our full Privacy Policy before using our site.