Jump to content

The ramp up to the split of SEC/Big10 from G5

NT80

By NT80
in Mean Green Football

 Share

Recommended Posts

NT80 Grand Master

NT80

Posted
Posted

Big Ten, SEC form advisory group as conferences' bond tightens

The move is significant because it reflects a growing relationship between the two largest and wealthiest conferences and their respective commissioners as the balance of power continues to tilt in their favor in the evolving collegiate landscape.

Sources have told ESPN that Big Ten commissioner Tony Petitti and SEC commissioner Greg Sankey have been working closely together -- more than their predecessors had -- at a time when conference expansion has further separated their leagues from the other FBS conferences.

https://www.espn.com/college-sports/story/_/id/39444847/big-ten-sec-form-advisory-group-conferences-bond-tightens

  • Puking Eagle 1
New2Green Contributor

New2Green

Posted
Posted

College football keeps changing and changing. Not sure if it is for the best. Conference realignment, NIL, transfer portal going to make things tougher for college coaches. When a HC from a power five conference takes a DC position in the NFL that tells you a lot.

El Paso Eagle Grand Master

El Paso Eagle

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, Hunter Green said:

I'm curious how this affects to ACC and the Big 12. Are they on the outside looking in as well?

Maybe these two should form an advisory council for Basketball 

  • Upvote 2
NT80 Grand Master

NT80

Posted
  • Author
Posted
On 2/2/2024 at 10:45 PM, Hunter Green said:

I'm curious how this affects to ACC and the Big 12. Are they on the outside looking in as well?

Half of the ACC wants out of that conference to try and join the Big10 or SEC.  If Florida State ever finds the key to escape then the ACC won't be what they are today. 

  • Upvote 3
  • Popular Post
emmitt01 Grand Master

emmitt01

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted
On 2/2/2024 at 10:45 PM, Hunter Green said:

I'm curious how this affects to ACC and the Big 12. Are they on the outside looking in as well?

Geez, imagine if you did something crazy, like forego revenue for almost a decade, just to get into one of those leagues. 
 

Man, you’d feel pretty stupid and look pretty desperate.   But who would do something that crazy? 

  • Upvote 3
  • Haha 5
  • Eye Roll 1
ScottC Rookie

ScottC

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, emmitt01 said:

Geez, imagine if you did something crazy, like forego revenue for almost a decade, just to get into one of those leagues. 
 

Man, you’d feel pretty stupid and look pretty desperate.   But who would do something that crazy? 

I guess you’re referring to Stanford and Cal….and SMU lol. 

  • Upvote 1
ScottC Rookie

ScottC

Posted
Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, Cougar King said:

Stanford and Cal are getting revenue.

30%, forgoing 70%. Quite a lot for schools who were already at the table. Per the ACC release Stanford, Cal AND SMU will still receive revenue from the College Football Playoff, bowl games and NCAA Basketball Tournament. Also, I believe all three, SMU included, will get their full share of the ACC Network money. 

Edited by ScottC
  • Confused 1
  • Eye Roll 1
  • Puking Eagle 1
SMU2006 Mentor

SMU2006

Posted
Posted (edited)
11 hours ago, emmitt01 said:

Geez, imagine if you did something crazy, like forego revenue for almost a decade, just to get into one of those leagues. 
 

Man, you’d feel pretty stupid and look pretty desperate.   But who would do something that crazy? 

LOL.  SMU becomes a full revenue share member if any legacy ACC school leaves the league (including the close to $1b it will cost a school to leave the conference as well as the rights to their home games through 2036).

Edited by SMU2006
  • Downvote 2
SMU2006 Mentor

SMU2006

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, ScottC said:

30%, forgoing 70%. Quite a lot for schools who were already at the table. Per the ACC release Stanford, Cal AND SMU will still receive revenue from the College Football Playoff, bowl games and NCAA Basketball Tournament. Also, I believe all three, SMU included, will get their full share of the ACC Network money. 

This is correct.  SMU will receive around $12m in total revenue (roughly).  Obviously could change depending on number of NCAA basketball credits.

  • Downvote 2
Wag Tag Grand Master

Wag Tag

Posted
Posted

First up the union is going to happen. College will establish a collective labor agreement like the pros. The next step is private corporations or individuals are going to buy the teams with the schools getting a %. The college football revenue agreements are going to explode! The future!

  • Pissed 1
DentonStang Mentor

DentonStang

Posted
Posted

We're making more as ACC members while foregoing that revenue than we were making in the AAC.  

Anyone in the AAC SHOULD be desperate enough to take that deal, so yes, we were desperate.  But it's not a financially bad move.

  • Eye Roll 1
  • Puking Eagle 1
El Paso Eagle Grand Master

El Paso Eagle

Posted
Posted
21 minutes ago, DentonStang said:

We're making more as ACC members while foregoing that revenue than we were making in the AAC.  

Anyone in the AAC SHOULD be desperate enough to take that deal, so yes, we were desperate.  But it's not a financially bad move.

How freaking pathetic are you that you constantly come here to post. Go away. Stay away.

  • Upvote 2
  • Haha 1
NT80 Grand Master

NT80

Posted
  • Author
Posted
58 minutes ago, DentonStang said:

We're making more as ACC members while foregoing that revenue than we were making in the AAC.  

Anyone in the AAC SHOULD be desperate enough to take that deal, so yes, we were desperate.  But it's not a financially bad move.

Sending Volleyball, etc to California and up and down the East coast won't be easy on students or fans.  Oh wait, no fans....just hard on the students.

  • Upvote 1
DentonStang Mentor

DentonStang

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, NT80 said:

Sending Volleyball, etc to California and up and down the East coast won't be easy on students or fans.  Oh wait, no fans....just hard on the students.

What, like Annapolis, Philadelphia, Tampa......

  • Eye Roll 1
UNTLifer Grand Master

UNTLifer

Posted
Posted (edited)
18 hours ago, DentonStang said:

No

Hey Stank, explain how you are making more, foregoing revenue in the ACC, than you are in the AAC?

On second thought, I don't care.

Edited by UNTLifer
  • Haha 2
DentonStang Mentor

DentonStang

Posted
Posted
On 2/6/2024 at 4:26 PM, UNTLifer said:

Hey Stank, explain how you are making more, foregoing revenue in the ACC, than you are in the AAC?

On second thought, I don't care.

There are multiple income streams.  Media contract is one (the biggest) but there is also bowl revenue, playoff, NCAA tournament, and others that flow through conferences.

UNTLifer Grand Master

UNTLifer

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, DentonStang said:

There are multiple income streams.  Media contract is one (the biggest) but there is also bowl revenue, playoff, NCAA tournament, and others that flow through conferences.

Don’t all those streams run through the ACC office?

SMU2006 Mentor

SMU2006

Posted
Posted
9 hours ago, UNTLifer said:

Don’t all those streams run through the ACC office?

Yes (for the most part).  Regardless the revenue will be greater despite getting nothing from the media deal than what SMU was slated to receive in the American.

  • Downvote 1
  • Puking Eagle 1
TheColonyEagle Grand Master

TheColonyEagle

Posted
Posted
On 2/2/2024 at 10:45 PM, Hunter Green said:

I'm curious how this affects to ACC and the Big 12. Are they on the outside looking in as well?

The logical answer is eventually, yes. The delusional answer is no....a.....West Virginia or Boston College or..........wait for it......SMU 😂 will be on the same level as Ohio State and Texas. Not gonna happen.

Just split up already. I'm going to say that the SMUs and North Texas's of the world will be right back in the same level of college football in less than five years. The question will be what will happen to Texas Tech, TCU, etc.....

They will not be in the group with Alabama, Michigan, OU, USC, etc.

Big time college football is about to be 40 teams

  • Upvote 2
  • Sad 1
SMU2006 Mentor

SMU2006

Posted
Posted
19 hours ago, TheColonyEagle said:

The logical answer is eventually, yes. The delusional answer is no....a.....West Virginia or Boston College or..........wait for it......SMU 😂 will be on the same level as Ohio State and Texas. Not gonna happen.

Just split up already. I'm going to say that the SMUs and North Texas's of the world will be right back in the same level of college football in less than five years. The question will be what will happen to Texas Tech, TCU, etc.....

They will not be in the group with Alabama, Michigan, OU, USC, etc.

Big time college football is about to be 40 teams

It isn't about being on the same level as Ohio State and Texas.  For programs like WVU, SMU, and BC its about making the cut.  The next step is a break away from the G5.  The expanded playoff will likely be 8 teams from Big 10/SEC and four from the Big 12/ACC.

The Big 12 and ACC will be a step below the Big 10/SEC but won't be left for dead like the G5 will inevitably be here in the next decade.

  • Eye Roll 1
  • Downvote 2

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Tell a friend

    Love GoMeanGreen.com? Tell a friend!

  • What's going on Mean Green?

    1. 12

      Keebler has to go!

      I've been griping about this for decades at this point. It is amazingly dumb and does nothing for us. Did he have a better deal on the table? Unlikely.. Would it keep him here if he did well and a big program came calling. No. It doesn't do a dang thing for us. Yet again, and again,and again, and again we do it. It costs us every single time.
      • 1
      • Upvote
      MeanGreenTeeth in Mean Green Football
    2. 5

      Earth to GMG

      Really???? Rick
      FirefightnRick in Mean Green Football
    3. 3

      Honest tactical question here…

      No I’m in complete agreement. Rick
      FirefightnRick in Mean Green Football
    4. 5

      Earth to GMG

      The point stands that we aren’t buying out three years of Morris’ contract. He will got one more year, at least, to sell the leadership on why he should keep his job.
      • 1
      • Upvote
      untjim1995 in Mean Green Football
    5. 12

      Keebler has to go!

      It’s simply a coach’s decision imo. In 2009 I watched TCU’s Jaden Oberkrom line up and attempt a 60 yarder for Arlington Martin vs Trinity at Pennington….as a Freshman. Trinity jumped off sides so he kicked from 55 and just missed to the right by a foot. It would have been good from 65. I promise he was kicking in Junior High and if he wasn’t that’s all on the coaches.. Both years my son played for Weatherford Hall Middle School against Aledo, 7th and 8th grade, Aledo kicked all their extra points. It’s part of the game, and Aledo hires people that demand all of the game be taught and coached. Nothing about their special teams are missed, just like the rest of their game. But this didn’t surprise anyone because Aledo had just had a kid, Chance Nevarez on their varsity set the national record for the most extra points made in a row. Buchanon demanded it, so his Junior High coaches demanded it. So just like everything, if a coach decides it’s not in his interest then he’s not gonna demand it and coach it. Same for installing a short yardage play from under center. If the coach isn’t interested in it and instead thinks handing off 5 yards deep to make 6 inches is the best way, despite how many times he’s seen that not work….then his team will never develop one. Same for kickers in Junior high. Rick
      FirefightnRick in Mean Green Football

  • Popular Contributors

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      15,479
    • Most Online
      1,865
    meangreen0015
    Newest Member
    meangreen0015
    Joined

  • Most Points

    1. 1
      El Paso Eagle
      El Paso Eagle
      166,954
    2. 2
      NT80
      NT80
      129,958
    3. 3
      KingDL1
      KingDL1
      128,415
    4. 4
      greenminer
      greenminer
      118,565
    5. 5
      TheReal_jayD
      TheReal_jayD
      104,984

  • Biggest Gamblers

    1. 1
      EdtheEagle
      EdtheEagle
      26,589,381
    2. 2
      UNTLifer
      UNTLifer
      4,156,819
    3. 3
      untphd
      untphd
      779,513
    4. 4
      flyonthewall
      flyonthewall
      670,422
    5. 5
      3_n_out
      3_n_out
      578,480
    6. 6
      SteaminWillieBeamin
    7. 7
      cousin oliver
      cousin oliver
      448,120
    8. 8
      meangreenfaninno
    9. 9
      South Texas Green
    10. 10
      outoftown
      outoftown
      314,541

WE BELIEVE IN THE MEAN GREEN!

News

Recruiting

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Please review our full Privacy Policy before using our site.