Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Quarterback roulette again. 

Morris finding out what life is like without Pat Mahomes or Cam Ward, I guess.

Too bad he just got to campus and didn't have months to install his offense and see which quarterback gave him the best chance to win games.

 

  • Upvote 3
  • Eye Roll 2
  • Downvote 3
Posted
26 minutes ago, Side.Show.Joe said:

This seems to be a good decision by Morris. Based on what Rogers did against FIU, he deserves it. 

Overdue announcement.  Maybe he told the team right after the game, I don’t know.  But him not naming in the post FIU game or sometime Sunday/Monday just didn’t make a lot of sense to me.  Rogers should have started against FIU.

  • Eye Roll 5
Posted

Good. Rogers deserves his shot at QB1. I like Stone Earle, but our experience so far in Games 1 & 2 indicates that Rogers gives us our best chance to win. With our worst in FBS defense, we can't afford turnovers and have to make the most of every offensive possession, and that's Rogers.

  • Upvote 1
Posted

Earle did not value the ball as much as he needed.  5 picks in 5 quarters should rightfully earn you an opportunity to watch for a while.  Add in 5 fumbles (luckily only 1 lost) from the rest of the offense and the football has been loose a lot.

Really need Rogers to step up and stabilize the QB spot and hopefully it trickles down to the rest of the team.

  • Upvote 5
Posted

I am hoping along with this change, Morris, at least for the short-term, will slow down the pace on Offense and work on ball control to help minimize the amount of time the Defense is on the field. 

  • Upvote 4
  • Skeptical Eagle 1
Posted
33 minutes ago, TreeFiddy said:

Earle did not value the ball as much as he needed.  5 picks in 5 quarters should rightfully earn you an opportunity to watch for a while.  Add in 5 fumbles (luckily only 1 lost) from the rest of the offense and the football has been loose a lot.

Really need Rogers to step up and stabilize the QB spot and hopefully it trickles down to the rest of the team.

Having a QB that protects the ball and can move the sticks without having to hit home run balls will help keep the defense off the field. This SHOULD make the defense look a little better. Hopefully, anyway. 

  • Upvote 3
Posted
1 hour ago, El Paso Eagle said:

I am hoping along with this change, Morris, at least for the short-term, will slow down the pace on Offense and work on ball control to help minimize the amount of time the Defense is on the field. 

I said this after Game 1. Why are we hurrying to the line after just losing three yards on first down?

  • Upvote 2
Posted
15 hours ago, Monkeypox said:

Defense isn't getting fixed without the bodies, IMO. 

This is the problem most try to say is poor coaching...

instead, it's about not having enough of the right personnel.

  • Upvote 1
  • Lovely Take 1
  • Skeptical Eagle 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Please review our full Privacy Policy before using our site.