KEEP THIS IN MIND

[meangreenbob]

Realignment is not over.

So, who looks more attractive? 
Texas State? Rice? UTSA? Oh, or North Texas? 

[DeepGreen]

1 hour ago, meangreenbob said:

Realignment is not over.

So, who looks more attractive? 
Texas State? Rice? UTSA? Oh, or North Texas? 

But wait!  We have 80,000 students in Denton!

[Side.Show.Joe]

1 hour ago, meangreenbob said:

Realignment is not over.

So, who looks more attractive? 
Texas State? Rice? UTSA? Oh, or North Texas? 

Fortunately for us, realignment has almost nothing to do with performance. 

[NT80]

40 minutes ago, Side.Show.Joe said:

Fortunately for us, realignment has almost nothing to do with performance. 

It's true, just look at $mut buying their way up.

[NTSU52]

2 hours ago, meangreenbob said:

Realignment is not over.

So, who looks more attractive? 
Texas State? Rice? UTSA? Oh, or North Texas? 

None of those programs have the facilities or have made the financial commitments to athletics that North Texas has. 

[meaniegreenie]

13 minutes ago, NTSU52 said:

None of those programs have the facilities or have made the financial commitments to athletics that North Texas has. 

It's funny that for decades, we said if we could just get updated facilities, money, and admin support, we'd be unstoppable.  We finally got all of these things and yet we're being embarrassed by programs that 10 years ago either didn't exist or were 1-AA.

[RBP79]

Hmmm.....does AAC have buyers remorse??

I'll have a better sense of this come Oct1.

[keith]

Based on the thread title, I honestly thought the post was going to be:

The biggest improvement a team makes during the season is usually from game 1 to game 2.  

If that turns out to be true for us, then we're in for a world of hurt.