Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, NT93 said:

SMU responds:

 

 

IMG_1117.gif

 

27 minutes ago, DentonStang said:

Doesn't really mean anything other than they aren't immediately kicked out over their bizarre letter stunt

IMG_1118.gif.76f61005706efbe055ea043f5836df75.gif

  • Upvote 1
  • Haha 2
Posted (edited)

If this is still all about a P5 vs G5 NCAA D1 existence we should wish American Athletic Conference Commissioner Areska good luck 🍀 in getting those 2 designations dropped.  With a 12 team football playoff what do the designations really mean any more? 
 

Also:

The Dan Patrick Show reported San Diego State still intends on going to the Pac-12, and that SMU, Boise State, and UNLV are possible additions for the conference as well.

SAY WHAT?!?!😳  Those in the PAC12 now or in the future who are extremely academic-conscious (like Stanford among others) should really get excited about possible future PAC12 member Boise State U’s Truck Driving School being in its curriculum. https://cdltrainingtoday.com/schools/id/boise-state-university/

IMG_8901.jpeg.b1e3d74c87822e422688202bdf2f46a8.jpeg

GMG!

Edited by PlummMeanGreen
  • Haha 1
Posted
2 hours ago, PlummMeanGreen said:

If this is still all about a P5 vs G5 NCAA D1 existence we should wish American Athletic Conference Commissioner Areska good luck 🍀 in getting those 2 designations dropped.  With a 12 team football playoff what do the designations really mean any more? 
 

Also:

The Dan Patrick Show reported San Diego State still intends on going to the Pac-12, and that SMU, Boise State, and UNLV are possible additions for the conference as well.

SAY WHAT?!?!😳  Those in the PAC12 now or in the future who are extremely academic-conscious (like Stanford among others) should really get excited about possible future PAC12 member Boise State U’s Truck Driving School being in its curriculum. https://cdltrainingtoday.com/schools/id/boise-state-university/

IMG_8901.jpeg.b1e3d74c87822e422688202bdf2f46a8.jpeg

GMG!

Doesn't make sense does it?  That's because it's just BS thrown against the wall to see what sticks. It's not based on actual reporting, sources, or fact. That's what practically ALL of the reporting on this topic has been for 6+ months (including pro-PAC articles).

We're a long way from Walter Kronkite.

  • Upvote 2
  • Downvote 1
Posted

When all this shakes out you'll have a watered down PAC12/14. or whatever. 

It will be interesting if they can keep their P5 rating. I mean there just replacing P5's with G5's..

I say go for it Smut!!!!

  • Haha 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Please review our full Privacy Policy before using our site.