Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
4 hours ago, UNTLifer said:

Says the entire football team signed a letter denying it by saying it was "exaggerated" and there is no proof he knew.  Now, if it is true, can these players NIL deals be docked or revoked? 

  • Confused 1
Posted
3 hours ago, Mo Green said:

What does this have to do with UNT?

It doesn't which is why I told the MOD's to move it if needed, but this is the forum that most people read.

  • Upvote 1
Posted
33 minutes ago, Green Crazy said:

Says the entire football team signed a letter denying it by saying it was "exaggerated" and there is no proof he knew.  Now, if it is true, can these players NIL deals be docked or revoked? 

"The head coach is ultimately responsible for the culture of his team," Schill wrote in his message to the Northwestern community. "The hazing we investigated was widespread and clearly not a secret within the program, providing Coach Fitzgerald with the opportunity to learn what was happening. Either way, the culture in Northwestern Football, while incredible in some ways, was broken in others."

  • Sad 1
Posted
8 minutes ago, UNTLifer said:

"The head coach is ultimately responsible for the culture of his team," Schill wrote in his message to the Northwestern community. "The hazing we investigated was widespread and clearly not a secret within the program, providing Coach Fitzgerald with the opportunity to learn what was happening. Either way, the culture in Northwestern Football, while incredible in some ways, was broken in others."

The head coach was originally given like a 2-week suspension by the school Prez.   Then (under pressure?) he said he reevaluated and decided the coach should have known about the hazing and fired him.  

  • Upvote 1
Posted
21 minutes ago, NT80 said:

The head coach was originally given like a 2-week suspension by the school Prez.   Then (under pressure?) he said he reevaluated and decided the coach should have known about the hazing and fired him.  

I think he thought it might go away. Then the school paper reported on more allegations and had more corroboration. Even still, thought he’d only get games suspended, not fired. Going 1-11 last year probably didn’t help. I remember watching the game where they stunned Notre Dame in 95. He’s pretty much been there since.  

  • Upvote 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, meanrob said:

I think he thought it might go away. Then the school paper reported on more allegations and had more corroboration. Even still, thought he’d only get games suspended, not fired. Going 1-11 last year probably didn’t help. I remember watching the game where they stunned Notre Dame in 95. He’s pretty much been there since.  

I think last year's downfall (1-11) was another nail in his coffin.  I watched their opening game last season, a win over Nebraska in Ireland.  NW played well but Nebraska ended up not good either.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Please review our full Privacy Policy before using our site.