Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
3 hours ago, UNTcrazy727 said:

Don’t think I’ve ever seen this one before

image.png.b7e6c845ec107a9c2445ec57e6eba06e.png

Used only one year, 1972.   It's a hard mini helmet to find!

Hayden Fry was hired in 1973.  He changed the logo again and started using Mean Green in Marketing!

Visual History of the Flying Worm - University of North Texas Athletics

  • Upvote 4
Posted
14 hours ago, UNT86 said:

Always have thought the 1994 look was underappreciated.  Also, one for one on conference championships in that helmet.

The absolute worst we ever had, IMVHO.

I think we really need to pick one and really stick with it, other than maybe a once a season special.

  • Upvote 3
Posted
1 hour ago, NT80 said:

It's still a ripoff of their idea.   They look too similar...and not a good look anyway, but the players seem to like it.   What do they know?, lol.

I mean ours is more unique and it fits us. We are eagles with wings, duck feathers are silly.  I think it was an idea that we developed into something cool, not as much as a ripoff. That would be Texas HS logos ripping off college logos.

  • Haha 1
  • Eye Roll 1
Posted
50 minutes ago, NT80 said:

Looks great.  I could support this!   

Fits well on the helmet; better than the SOW.

I just don’t like that interlocking NT. I feel like we should be using more eagle SOW/State of Texas or something logos than that. Creating and building a better brand that people will remember should be the goal 

  • Upvote 2
Posted
1 hour ago, NorthTexasSportsNetwork said:

I just don’t like that interlocking NT. I feel like we should be using more eagle SOW/State of Texas or something logos than that. Creating and building a better brand that people will remember should be the goal 

I don't think doubling down on a trend (TX Outline) is a way to build a better brand that stands out. It's an overused look that dozens and dozens of Texas high school and colleges use. I don't mind it as an alternative logo for merch, but we're leaning too hard on it, IMO. 

  • Upvote 5
Posted
43 minutes ago, UNTcrazy727 said:

I don't think doubling down on a trend (TX Outline) is a way to build a better brand that stands out. It's an overused look that dozens and dozens of Texas high school and colleges use. I don't mind it as an alternative logo for merch, but we're leaning too hard on it, IMO. 

I couldn't agree more.  That's a cheap look + on helmets, the SOW inside the Texas shape is so small you can't tell what it is on TV or from the stands.

  • Upvote 3
Posted

I think we can all agree the SOW needs to stick around as our primary logo. That said, we need something else to compliment it within our branding. We can't keep slapping the SOW on different things and calling it a different logo (I.E. TX outline, UNT script, North Texas script, etc.). As someone who loves the interlocking NT, here are some schools who use interlocking letters as a secondary logo. It can be done! 

Oregon State:

image.png.60cf0fd37a16a6f09e7f66959821106f.png

Florida State:

image.png.f1e0fa470751894475da7c3c2a10bfcc.png

Texas State:

image.png.46644de41d49451caa370a2ca8931d1d.png

Arizona State:

image.png.b1a4781eb29c03b1abdfcabe4b5e0bb7.png

South Carolina:

image.png.3e4de9f62343d93571f469d854205b88.png

  • Upvote 1
Posted
24 minutes ago, UNTcrazy727 said:

I think we can all agree the SOW needs to stick around as our primary logo. That said, we need something else to compliment it within our branding. We can't keep slapping the SOW on different things and calling it a different logo (I.E. TX outline, UNT script, North Texas script, etc.). As someone who loves the interlocking NT, here are some schools who use interlocking letters as a secondary logo. It can be done! 

Oregon State:

image.png.60cf0fd37a16a6f09e7f66959821106f.png

Florida State:

image.png.f1e0fa470751894475da7c3c2a10bfcc.png

Texas State:

image.png.46644de41d49451caa370a2ca8931d1d.png

Arizona State:

image.png.b1a4781eb29c03b1abdfcabe4b5e0bb7.png

South Carolina:

image.png.3e4de9f62343d93571f469d854205b88.png

Well said.  And I personally don’t love the interlocking NT, but your list of examples from other schools could go on for pages…and I say that to say, you make an excellent point.  

Posted

I've come to realize that we could have the most beloved logo in all of sports history and someone will not like.  Taking that into account, that we will never please everyone, we should just pick one and stick with it.

 

As long as it is this:

Visual History of the Flying Worm - University of North Texas Athletics

  • Upvote 2
  • Downvote 1
Posted

I just think it's bad design to have interlocking letters on the helmet.

Some things seem meant for stationary/formal print, while at the same time not at home on a football helmet.

I think some programs get away with it because they've stuck with it for so long.

  • Upvote 1
Posted
8 hours ago, NT80 said:

Looks great.  I could support this!   

Fits well on the helmet; better than the SOW.

This is not directed at you @NT80 because I’ve seen several people say this about how the SOW fits on the helmet.  My question is this:  Why can’t it be sized to appropriately fit the helmet? 

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, NT93 said:

This is not directed at you @NT80 because I’ve seen several people say this about how the SOW fits on the helmet.  My question is this:  Why can’t it be sized to appropriately fit the helmet? 

I think SOW could be sized or moved around to fit on a helmet.  I feel there are two main issues with it:

- size, the wings are very long and extend up, over the top of the helmet out of view, odd looking.

-the eagle head facing forward and down gets overlapped by the chin strap or facemask sidebar, not a good look.

Amazon.com : Riddell North Texas Mean Green NCAA Revolution Speed Mini  Football Helmet : Sports & Outdoors

North Texas Mean Green Schutt Mini Authentic Football Helmet By Schutt product image 1 of 1 slide

An upward eagle head looks and fits better on the helmet, but sometime it's feet get overlapped by the chin strap..

University of North Texas Athletics Auctions | Powered By  meangreensports.com

Edited by NT80
  • Upvote 1
Posted
22 hours ago, NT91 said:

image.jpeg.88bde38ea71d71151bd2efe42a28f7d0.jpeg         

 

22 hours ago, UNTLifer said:

If we are going to incorporate an interlocking logo, this is the way to go.

Totally agree. I've always favored the "make it simple/uncluttered and bold" designs. Kind of like this one.......Picture

  • Upvote 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
1 hour ago, NT91 said:

image.jpeg.2cd4616a406892a46f2d86d7624802b8.jpeg

 

I like that look!   

But I fear UNT Administration is pressuring Athletics to get on board with pushing "UNT" as primary branding...

Talons of UNT (@Talons23) / Twitter

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Tell a friend

    Love GoMeanGreen.com? Tell a friend!
  • What's going on Mean Green?

    1. 11

      If we win out reg season we are in?

    2. 83

      TX State to the PAC 2?

    3. 1

      Join the Infantry in Houston - Tuesday, 2/11 at 8pm

    4. 154

      24/25 MBB Attendance Tracker

  • Popular Contributors

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      15,508
    • Most Online
      1,865

    Newest Member
    Jepper
    Joined
  • Most Points

    1. 1
    2. 2
      NT80
      NT80
      144,093
    3. 3
      KingDL1
      KingDL1
      134,595
    4. 4
      greenminer
      greenminer
      129,165
    5. 5
      TheReal_jayD
      TheReal_jayD
      109,819
  • Biggest Gamblers

    1. 1
      EdtheEagle
      EdtheEagle
      26,593,359
    2. 2
      UNTLifer
      UNTLifer
      4,709,549
    3. 3
      untphd
      untphd
      866,960
    4. 4
    5. 5
      flyonthewall
      flyonthewall
      672,652
    6. 6
      3_n_out
      3_n_out
      578,480
    7. 7
    8. 8
      UNT_FH_FR_YR
      UNT_FH_FR_YR
      471,139
    9. 9
    10. 10
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Please review our full Privacy Policy before using our site.