Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

That's great. We are clearly putting together a recruiting staff on paper. I'm pumped for that. I think dividends can happen. But, I feel like we're slow balling this. Does the crew have start dates? Are they waiting for a new year new them? Let's get to cookin. 

  • Upvote 1
Posted
  On 12/30/2022 at 2:18 PM, TheReal_jayD said:

Think things are moving behind scenes. Expecting big visitor list next weekend. But also working with limited spots at moment. Expect some roster management as well. 

Expand  

Are any of our offensive stars leaving, or considering leaving?

  • Upvote 1
Posted (edited)

Shorter would be a huge loss.   That guy is a stud.

I would love Adaway back.   But of all the backs, Ayo Adeyi is the one guy I don't want to lose.

Edited by akriesman
  • Upvote 1
Posted

Lot of comments relative to several new football coaches having great local connections to DFW recruits.

I just wonder if that really is a significant advantage over past NT coaches.

I don't think NT has had a problem identifying good local prospects.  The issue is signing them, will the new coaches be any more successful?

I hope it does give NT an edge, but frankly I doubt it.  SMU and their connections (NIL money) has just about their pick of area recruits that don't get P5 attention.  Being in the same conference should even things up a little, but there is no hint of that yet.  

I would like to think that is because of the lateness of the coaching change. 

Having better recruiters on staff is an improvement, but I wonder how much it will really help

I do think the new staff will be better coaching and that will improve the team. 

  • Upvote 3
Posted
  On 1/1/2023 at 7:50 AM, Cooley said:

These guys just need to hit on 2-3 big names and I think the perception will change that UNT is a viable options other than SMU, TCU or UTSA

Expand  

I have often thought about this too.

get a stud QB and inevitably a few other studs will want to receive the ball from him

get a stud DL and other DLs will want to chase QBs with him. Etc…

Posted
  On 1/1/2023 at 7:50 AM, Cooley said:

I think the benefit will be with those kids desiring to transfer back to the area; after they realize the grass was not greener. They generally reach out to a trusted adviser including their HS school coach. The relationships/credibility the coach has with Coach O and Gilbert hopefully will be the difference.

These guys just need to hit on 2-3 big names and I think the perception will change that UNT is a viable options other than SMU, TCU or UTSA

Expand  

Agreed, except I'd take TCU out of the equation at this point.  Them playing in the national championship game will change the level of recruit they can/will go get.  But I completely agree on the SMU/UTSA deal.  I think we will see early and often a few more kids each class staying closer to home, and choosing UNT.  

  • Upvote 1
Posted
  On 1/1/2023 at 6:37 AM, GrandGreen said:

Lot of comments relative to several new football coaches having great local connections to DFW recruits.

I just wonder if that really is a significant advantage over past NT coaches.

I don't think NT has had a problem identifying good local prospects.  The issue is signing them, will the new coaches be any more successful?

I hope it does give NT an edge, but frankly I doubt it.  SMU and their connections (NIL money) has just about their pick of area recruits that don't get P5 attention.  Being in the same conference should even things up a little, but there is no hint of that yet.  

I would like to think that is because of the lateness of the coaching change. 

Having better recruiters on staff is an improvement, but I wonder how much it will really help

I do think the new staff will be better coaching and that will improve the team. 

Expand  

Agree. And it will be pretty easy to prove. Either this staff that looks amazing on paper gets better recruits or they don’t. We don’t know yet. We will soon 

Posted
  On 1/1/2023 at 4:20 PM, GMG24 said:

Agreed, except I'd take TCU out of the equation at this point.  Them playing in the national championship game will change the level of recruit they can/will go get.  But I completely agree on the SMU/UTSA deal.  I think we will see early and often a few more kids each class staying closer to home, and choosing UNT.  

Expand  

Head to head with UTSA is critical. SMU will be a different obsticial due to NIL. 

Posted
  On 1/1/2023 at 7:02 PM, greenminer said:

We'd be fine at RB without him but, man! He was still that special.  A level of up from anyone behind him, IMO.

Expand  

I think Addaway is our best back. I wonder if his ankle will limit his portal options.

  • Upvote 2

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Tell a friend

    Love GoMeanGreen.com? Tell a friend!
  • What's going on Mean Green?

    1. 12

      Why are we doing this?

    2. 3

      2025 Softball: Around the AAC Mega Thread

    3. 15

      1977 interview with Bill Blakeley

    4. 28

      I seem to recall…

    5. 30

      WBB: Transfer Portal

  • Popular Contributors

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      15,555
    • Most Online
      1,865

    Newest Member
    John DeBaptiste
    Joined
  • Most Points

    1. 1
    2. 2
      NT80
      NT80
      156,108
    3. 3
      KingDL1
      KingDL1
      145,355
    4. 4
      greenminer
      greenminer
      138,360
    5. 5
      GMG_Dallas
      GMG_Dallas
      111,330
  • Biggest Gamblers

    1. 1
      EdtheEagle
      EdtheEagle
      26,593,489
    2. 2
      UNTLifer
      UNTLifer
      4,963,614
    3. 3
      untphd
      untphd
      901,621
    4. 4
    5. 5
      flyonthewall
      flyonthewall
      674,718
    6. 6
      3_n_out
      3_n_out
      578,480
    7. 7
    8. 8
      UNT_FH_FR_YR
      UNT_FH_FR_YR
      494,051
    9. 9
    10. 10
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Please review our full Privacy Policy before using our site.