Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Is this a North Texas thing or a must-have in every athletic department? I am not entirely confident we have gotten our money's worth from this spend unless it is just a vetting service for guys we are already chasing or who have applied. I guess HR doesn't do that in college athletics.

 

GMG

  • Upvote 3
  • Eye Roll 3
Posted

Consultants are typically overpaid and deliver subpar work. I'm kind of worried that we are hiring a cobsulting firm. Does this mean that we don't have a guy? Or are they here to help with negotiations and what not?

 

  • Upvote 3
  • Eye Roll 1
Posted
11 minutes ago, jtm0097 said:

Consultants are typically overpaid and deliver subpar work. I'm kind of worried that we are hiring a cobsulting firm. Does this mean that we don't have a guy? Or are they here to help with negotiations and what not?

 

In my experience, hiring a consultant helps to de-liable-ize the process...nothing more. The candidate(s) are more than likely already in pocket.

 

  • Upvote 7
Posted
9 hours ago, untcampbell said:

Is this a North Texas thing or a must-have in every athletic department? I am not entirely confident we have gotten our money's worth from this spend unless it is just a vetting service for guys we are already chasing or who have applied. I guess HR doesn't do that in college athletics.

 

GMG

Oh yes,  it's everyone.   Wren was hired away to WVU through one.

These firms are plugged in with the agencies that represent these coaches & ADs.    When you reach out to them, they will go fishing for you & bring back candidates that fit. 

Again, as far as the AD search goes, with NT being in the AAC, and with how much Neal was being paid, there should be a flood of qualified candidates coming in to choose from, with an already-qualified guy in pocket if none of the applicants tickle Neal's fancy.

  • Upvote 7
Posted

From what I’ve seen, I think these search firms serve a couple of main duties:

1- They’re not subject to state freedom of information laws. This allows coaches and their agents to speak freely and often with someone about the position without fear of those conversations or even knowledge that those conversations happened ending up on ESPN.

2- They are typically very well connected to other coaches and ADs so they can help an AD get “insider” information on any candidates the AD might be interested in.

  • Upvote 4
  • Thanks 1
Posted
15 minutes ago, meaniegreenie said:

I agree with the rule, but did I miss the secret access code that provides free access to DRC articles for all GMG members?

No need. Bert just writes up what he reads on here.

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 4
  • Pissed 1
  • Eye Roll 1
  • Downvote 1
  • Puking Eagle 1
Posted
16 minutes ago, El Paso Eagle said:

0d6fb53d-f29c-4847-8693-ad69ffc27b45_tex

 

 

yeah administrators I've talked to have confirmed for me the suspicion that a lot of it is about covering their tracks. They talk to a consultant, who does all the communicating and coordinating for them. 

You can hire a search firm to do most of the deal, or simply to be the go-between. As a public university, they are subject to FOIA requests, so some of this is just being able to avoid all the public scrutiny that can come from that. 

 

The email/text says "Meet here/there" and the rest can be done elsewhere. Or like on a messaging portal or something. 

  • Upvote 3
Posted
27 minutes ago, SilverEagle said:

Who was responsible for the McCasland and DeLong hire? Did they hire a consultant for those hires?

Probably not for Delong. I can’t imagine there’s much incentive for media outlets breaking the news on a softball coach hire.

I don’t remember if Wren used a search firm for Coach Mac or not. I would think some schools do hire search firms for basketball though.

Posted

Hopefully we have known Wren was leaving for quite some time and this supposed plan to hire an AD before the end of the week is not being strung together in a few days time, why not just let Mosely be the AD through the spring?

Not hiring a coach before early signing day seems like a bad idea. We only have 5 commits but it's not fair to them, they don't know if new coach will honor their commits or not. It's not fair to any player who's torn on entering the portal. If they wait for February's signing day they won't be at their new school for spring ball. This all seems bad.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Please review our full Privacy Policy before using our site.