Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

15F8401F-AFD3-4232-8A31-B52C28705616.thumb.jpeg.6059cba6dcc610eb59551961127f1847.jpeg

we are/were right there with all these teams just about. Dayton dropped even further behind us. So close. Not sure I have lost all hope…. We should be right there with Wyoming and SMU I figure.

  • Puking Eagle 1
Posted
43 minutes ago, glick1980 said:

I just don’t even understand how Rutgers is in the conversation with a NET of 77.

Agreed. I believe UNT should be in the conversation if all of these teams are… it’s pretty ridiculous. 

  • Upvote 2
Posted
2 minutes ago, Coffee and TV said:

And they just made the play-in game.

Yeah teams of 77 and 53 NET rankings beat out UNT who was at a 47…. So what’s the point in playing a tough schedule or doing anything…. It’s a giant joke now just like the football playoff series.

  • Upvote 4
Posted
2 minutes ago, MeanGreenDan said:

Don't lose to UTEP and LA Tech and then I'd get worked up about this.

But us dropping two of our last three games, we don't really deserve to be in the conversation.

That doesn’t explain a 77 ranked Rutgers gets in over us or a dozen other teams…. 

  • Upvote 2
Posted
4 minutes ago, Andrew said:

That doesn’t explain a 77 ranked Rutgers gets in over us or a dozen other teams…. 

I don't understand this either. Makes no sense. At this point, it leaves a lot of pretty good teams playing in the NIT. That is good for us.

  • Upvote 2
Posted
1 minute ago, GMG_Dallas said:

Why create NET rankings if you're going to ignore it anyways?

That's why I think it should just be based on NET for the at-large. As much as they say it isn't a popularity contest. We know it is.

  • Upvote 5
Posted

I tell you what if we sneak in there will be nobody that wants to play a laser focused Mean Green. But if we NIT I am convinced that first round team will also feel the wrath.

kind of like we came out and fried Rice.

Let the chips fall. 
GMG

Posted
Just now, NorthTexasWeLove said:

This. This is the BS that I'm against. 0 justification for this selection. 

They at least have a 34 NET, 18-13 Rutgers with a 77 NET should never have even been a bubble team.

  • Upvote 2

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love GoMeanGreen.com? Tell a friend!
  • What's going on Mean Green?

    1. 79

      Should we add Texas State to the AAC?

    2. 79

      Should we add Texas State to the AAC?

    3. 15

      Who did better? PAC 12 or Mountain West?

    4. 2

      ECU (1/14/25)

  • Popular Contributors

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      15,509
    • Most Online
      1,865

    Newest Member
    Jepper
    Joined
  • Most Points

    1. 1
    2. 2
      NT80
      NT80
      140,768
    3. 3
      KingDL1
      KingDL1
      132,920
    4. 4
      greenminer
      greenminer
      127,125
    5. 5
      TheReal_jayD
      TheReal_jayD
      109,619
  • Biggest Gamblers

    1. 1
      EdtheEagle
      EdtheEagle
      26,592,647
    2. 2
      UNTLifer
      UNTLifer
      4,496,449
    3. 3
      untphd
      untphd
      845,287
    4. 4
      flyonthewall
      flyonthewall
      672,612
    5. 5
      3_n_out
      3_n_out
      578,480
    6. 6
    7. 7
      UNT_FH_FR_YR
      UNT_FH_FR_YR
      471,139
    8. 8
    9. 9
    10. 10
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Please review our full Privacy Policy before using our site.