Jeff Younger Comes to UNT, Students Promptly Tell Him He's Not Welcome

[UNTLifer]

1 hour ago, Censored by Laurie said:

in 1950 "gay" pretty much exclusively meant happy and carefree. 

language changes and adapts to the times. your only personal biases and reluctance to evolve don't change societal advancements in language, nuance and understanding. 

and...let's be honest...nothing has been taught, redefined and engrained in "impressionable young minds" for hundreds of years more than religion...so maybe the piety tract isn't the best for you to follow. 

Was he following a piety tract?  Nope, just stating fact. 

[Coffee and TV]

13 hours ago, THOR said:

liar

I'm just not gonna bother with anyone on this subject. I could tell how viral this was going to be so I put it here purely as news content in this case. If someone wants to claim there's only two genders or say that sex and gender are the same, my only reply is that UNT taught me different, and I'm a millennial who hasn't been inside a classroom since 2007. 

[TheColonyEagle]

4 hours ago, Coffee and TV said:

If someone wants to claim there's only two genders or say that sex and gender are the same, my only reply is that UNT taught me different

I’m not going to debate you but I’m curious….what class did you learn that in? Was it a biology or some sort of anatomy class?

[Coffee and TV]

2 hours ago, TheColonyEagle said:

I’m not going to debate you but I’m curious….what class did you learn that in? Was it a biology or some sort of anatomy class?

Modern Architecture. 

[TheColonyEagle]

11 minutes ago, Coffee and TV said:

Modern Architecture. 

funny…

I know you and I probably don’t agree on a lot.  But I was genuinely curious.

All good

[UNTLifer]

41 minutes ago, TheColonyEagle said:

funny…

I know you and I probably don’t agree on a lot.  But I was genuinely curious.

All good

I was curious as well regarding what class this came from.

[ColoradoEagle]

I'll bite. Communication studies (and by close relation, psychology) teaches that gender is a social construct while sex refers specifically to biology (reproductive organs, chromosomes, hormones, etc).

Edited March 4, 2022 by ColoradoEagle

[Coffee and TV]

1 hour ago, TheColonyEagle said:

funny…

I know you and I probably don’t agree on a lot.  But I was genuinely curious.

All good

Sociology: Race, Class & Gender 

Would recommend as an elective for anybody, though this was like 2005. 

[TheColonyEagle]

2 hours ago, Coffee and TV said:

Sociology: Race, Class & Gender 

Would recommend as an elective for anybody, though this was like 2005. 

Thanks 

[TheColonyEagle]

2 hours ago, ColoradoEagle said:

I'll bite. Communication studies (and by close relation, psychology) teaches that gender is a social construct while sex refers specifically to biology (reproductive organs, chromosomes, hormones, etc).

So by that standard it would seem unfair that “biological” males are allowed to compete in women’s physical competitions like sports. Also to label someone that’s opposed to that as bigoted or hateful would also seem unfair. 
 

(I’m not saying you agree or disagree with it. Just making an observation) 

[Rudy]

On 3/3/2022 at 1:19 PM, texx2818 said:

None of the videos I watched had anyone threatening violence. The only person hurt at the event was someone that UNT police ran over apparently.

If you surround a squad car, (attempt to) prevent it from moving, and start beating on it, don't be surprised when things go south for you.  

[Rudy]

3 hours ago, texx2818 said:

The car was on the sidewalk. 

And if it is trying to move, regardless if it's on the street, or parked on the sidewalk, and trying to move to the street, the same rules apply  

[Censored by Laurie]

5 hours ago, Rudy said:

If you surround a squad car, (attempt to) prevent it from moving, and start beating on it, don't be surprised when things go south for you.  

protect and serve. 

[El Paso Eagle]

5 hours ago, texx2818 said:

The car was on the sidewalk. 

Oh, on the sidewalk ...

[Rudy]

3 hours ago, texx2818 said:

Actually, no, if it was on the sidewalk then the pedestrians have right-of-way.

No. If an emergency vehicle is on a scene, especially if emergency equipment is activated, they have they right of way. 

 

You're going to have to trust me on this. 

[Rudy]

12 hours ago, Censored by Laurie said:

protect and serve. 

OK, so you're in a car, in this case with someone that you are trying to protect, and a bunch of pissed of twits are blocking your path and trying to get in the car, what would you do? 

 

Wait, you'd probably let them do whatever they want. 

[Rudy]

38 minutes ago, texx2818 said:

Awesome, glad to know a cop could just turn their sirens on, pop a curb and ride the sidewalk and run someone over if they do chose with no repercussions. Thank you for the education.

Well that's not what I said at all, but whatever.

[DeepGreen]

Threads like this confirm, in my mind, that old people like me need to stick to sports topics only.

[untbowler]

those claiming and wanting "Tolerance" typically are the most "Intolerant" but hey at least UNT made some news

[ColoradoEagle]

2 hours ago, untbowler said:

those claiming and wanting "Tolerance" typically are the most "Intolerant" but hey at least UNT made some news

There's a difference of being tolerant of someone whose views you disagree with, and expecting someone to be tolerant of hate and bigotry. Back to the old tried and true...

Edited March 10, 2022 by ColoradoEagle

[untbowler]

1 hour ago, ColoradoEagle said:

There's a difference of being tolerant of someone whose views you disagree with, and expecting someone to be tolerant of hate and bigotry. Back to the old tried and true...

so is it actually Hate Speech and Bigotry or is it just Speech that you hate and assumed bigotry because their views do not match? 

I could care less if someone says something I do not like, I just ignore them, because they are generally on the fringe. That includes those on the right and left side of the aisle. It is always the fringe elements that stir the shit up. 

[ColoradoEagle]

1 hour ago, untbowler said:

so is it actually Hate Speech and Bigotry or is it just Speech that you hate and assumed bigotry because their views do not match? 

It's hate speech.

https://www.jeffyoungerfortexas.com/post/who-does-the-left-attack-effective-conservatives

Quote

• What the battle over a 7-year-old trans girl could mean for families nationwide, written by a man in a dress who is clearly confused.

[untbowler]

31 minutes ago, ColoradoEagle said:

It's hate speech.

https://www.jeffyoungerfortexas.com/post/who-does-the-left-attack-effective-conservatives

interesting looks like someone that does not believe in trangenderism especially in pre-pubescent kids. 

So how is that hate speech? Looks more like he is overly conservative on his views and you and the rest of the left do not like his views. 

Do I agree with him to a degree yes, but not to the extreme he seems to represent. So again is it hate speech or just Speech that you hate? 

He is a bible-thumper, now would I want him to represent in State House, Nope but should he be censored due to his views that clash with the LGBTQ.... community. Not at all, just ignore him. 

Just like I would not care to hear from a radical LGBTQ..... speaker, I would just ignore them not try to censor, but the left and cancel culture love to censor anything they disagree with, pretty sad echo chamber, but it is what it is with the fringe groups.

 

In the end @ColoradoEagle I think we will just agree to disagree. I respect your opinion, but disagree. 

Go Mean Green!!

Edited March 10, 2022 by untbowler

[ColoradoEagle]

42 minutes ago, untbowler said:

So how is that hate speech? Looks more like he is overly conservative on his views and you and the rest of the left do not like his views. 

https://www.ala.org/advocacy/intfreedom/hate#FN 1

"Generally, however, hate speech is any form of expression through which speakers intend to vilify, humiliate, or incite hatred against a group or a class of persons on the basis of race, religion, skin color sexual identity, gender identity, ethnicity, disability, or national origin. "

Seems like a fair definition and makes classifying the quote from the previous post pretty cut and dry.

 

Quote

Do I agree with him to a degree yes, but not to the extreme he seems to represent. So again is it hate speech or just Speech that you hate? 

Speech that I hate is that UNT is a commuter school, or the Mean Green will never do anything in athletics. Hate speech is denying someone's existence.

 

Quote

He is a bible-thumper, now would I want him to represent in State House, Nope but should he be censored due to his views that clash with the LGBTQ.... community. Not at all, just ignore him. 

Nobody censored this man. He showed up to what would be an obviously hostile environment and was boo'd out of the room. That's about as American as it gets. If he wanted a platform to espouse his controversial views, there are infinitely more and better opportunities than what's probably the second most liberal school in the state.

 

Quote

Just like I would not care to hear from a radical LGBTQ..... speaker, I would just ignore them not try to censor, but the left and cancel culture love to censor anything they disagree with, pretty sad echo chamber, but it is what it is with the fringe groups.

Why the pause? Also, I'm not sure what would be the equivalent insult of calling a transgender woman, 'a clearly confused man in a dress.' If you don't recognize that as heinous...

 

Quote

In the end @ColoradoEagle I think we will just agree to disagree. I respect your opinion, but disagree. 

Go Mean Green!!

That we can agree on. There's only one person on this forum I wouldn't have a beer with pregame, and that one is not you my friend. 😂 Go Mean Green!

Edited March 10, 2022 by ColoradoEagle

[Coffee and TV]

How can you possibly say that this man is promoting hate speech when his entire agenda is to erase people from existence? Wow the left is so intolerant.