Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

General observation that I am probably overthinking --

Last year there was something like 300+ less HS players signing in FBS/FCS. This year there was/is again the expectation that fewer HS players would sign overall.

In theory, shouldn't there have been a lot more players available, and therefore potentially higher rated platers? Yet, our HS players, while possibly diamonds in the rough, are not as highly rated.

Edited by El Paso Eagle
  • Upvote 3
Posted
1 hour ago, El Paso Eagle said:

General observation that I am probably overthinking --

Last year there was something like 300+ less HS players signing in FBS/FCS. This year there was/is again the expectation that fewer HS players would sign overall.

In theory, shouldn't there have been a lot more players available, and therefore potentially higher rated platers? Yet, our HS players, while possibly diamonds in the rough, are not as highly rated.

This may/may not answer your question, but in the gomeangreen podcast, they mention that 247 rated the transfer portal players first. This resulted in delayed ratings for the players. (A couple of our new signees are not rated). 

  • Upvote 1
  • Thanks 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Please review our full Privacy Policy before using our site.