Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

We still need to win out and, at worst, lose in the CUSA title match.  It would be 50/50 at that point.  I gather these media mouths are chomping at the bit to leave extra CUSA teams out. 

If we DO win out and win the tournament, I'm not sure any other CUSA teams are considered.  Haven't really thought about that.

  • Upvote 1
Posted (edited)
16 minutes ago, EagleD said:

Given last years history. If we don’t win the CUSA tournament, what would it take (can it happen) to get an at large bid?

We win every game except maybe La Tech at home. Cause the split with them and UAB. 23-5 heading into the tournament then 26-6 assuming we lose to UAB. We may have a shot at the 12 seed play in game. Hoping the wins/losses are correct there. 

Edited by Andrew
  • Upvote 1
Posted

What does it take in general? Since 2015, a C-USA team has pulled off an upset in the first round of every March Madness but 1 (not including the Covid off year). It's crazy that despite consistently pulling off upsets of top teams, we don't get better seeding and/or an at-large bid team.

  • Upvote 5
  • Haha 1
Posted

UAB taking a Quad 4 loss tonight hurt pretty bad. They are probably going to get punished in the computers which won't do us any favors. We need CUSA to be perceived as having a few good teams at the top for us to get an At-large.

  • Upvote 4
  • Downvote 1
Posted

The conference is not strong enough, UNT having a couple games canceled doesn't help either.. having 1 school in the NCAA tournament and the other in the NIT is as good as this conference is going to get.

 

  • Upvote 2
  • Sad 1
  • Skeptical Eagle 1
  • Downvote 1
Posted
32 minutes ago, Magic95Fan said:

UAB taking a Quad 4 loss tonight hurt pretty bad. They are probably going to get punished in the computers which won't do us any favors. We need CUSA to be perceived as having a few good teams at the top for us to get an At-large.

Yep. We needed to have NT and UAB basically run the table (or as close as possible with head to head). The UAB loss to Marshall hurts us both. 

  • Upvote 3
  • Downvote 1
Posted
34 minutes ago, Mean Green Matt said:

Yep. We needed to have NT and UAB basically run the table (or as close as possible with head to head). The UAB loss to Marshall hurts us both. 

Yes but at least it shows us that UAB is beatable and will help our ceding in the conference tourney.

  • Upvote 1
Posted
30 minutes ago, BillySee58 said:

this La Tech team, 

Sooo my thoughts are this... La Tech is the only team with a chance of an at large bid but they'd probably have to make a run in the conference tourney. I say this because that guy Lofton Jr is an NBA prospect and I wonder if he wouldn't boost them into an at-large bid because of the hype. Thoughts?

Posted
3 hours ago, GMG_Dallas said:

Sooo my thoughts are this... La Tech is the only team with a chance of an at large bid but they'd probably have to make a run in the conference tourney. I say this because that guy Lofton Jr is an NBA prospect and I wonder if he wouldn't boost them into an at-large bid because of the hype. Thoughts?

Disagree. The comitte cares only a very slightly for star power. LaTechs other numbers are however far behind UAB and NT, particularly the NET number, and that one matters much more. Also your hypothesis assumes those folks watch enough C-USA to have a strong opinion on Lofton. if UAB and NT do not get in, there is no way LaTech does.

  • Upvote 1
Posted
2 hours ago, outoftown said:

Disagree. The comitte cares only a very slightly for star power. LaTechs other numbers are however far behind UAB and NT, particularly the NET number, and that one matters much more. Also your hypothesis assumes those folks watch enough C-USA to have a strong opinion on Lofton. if UAB and NT do not get in, there is no way LaTech does.

My assumption that they know of Lofton is based on him being team USA's leading scorer in the most recent FIBA U-19 world cup and leading team USA to gold. The basketball world knows who he is. Bleacher Report has him in the under the radar draft prospects for 2022.

If you're saying NET rankings and other factors are more important then I'll take your word. I'm not too familiar with the at-large process and what they look for.

Posted

That Buffalo loss stings, and Wichita St keeps losing…barely above .500.  Drake is doing well, but that is really our only quality win outside the conference.  A close loss to Miami is still a loss.  Our OOC schedule looks like a really solid mix of high major and traditional mid-major powers.  Unfortunately the mid-majors are almost all in a down year compared to their history.  So we’re going to need to win out, imo.

Posted

looking at the NET rankings:

Mountain West has 5 school in the top 50

AAC has Houston at 2 and SMU at 55

CUSA has UAB at 43 and UNT at 54

ACC only has 3 schools in the top 50 (Duke 14, NC 37, Wake Forest 42) and with Virginia Tech at 51 and Miami at 63. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Please review our full Privacy Policy before using our site.