Jump to content

DRC Sunday column: Guiding UNT to bowl shows why Seth Littrell is great fit with Mean Green


Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, Side.Show.Joe said:

It's pathetic to justify mediocrity. If Littrell is back next season, it will be a very divided fan base and board.

No it is pathetic, because it is what you attempt to use to justify your point. You up play the losses and downplay the victories. How any fan can downplay wins over 2 bowl teams and one in the top 25 is bull _ _ _ ! As far as fan base ,"Just win baby"!

  • Upvote 5
  • Downvote 1
  • Puking Eagle 1
Posted

I agree that momentum has earned Seth another year of contract but he must keep it up.  If he wins the bowl and wins eight or more games next year then he may have turned the corner.  If he lapses back into .500 land it's not what we need for the AAC.  I'd expect that Wren has him on a short leash for next year.  If he can't win in the final season of CUSA, he surely won't win moving up.

  • Upvote 5
  • Downvote 1
Posted
10 hours ago, NT80 said:

We are playing a 6-6 MAC team.  A loss or last minute close win would be awful. 

This needs to be a 20+ point win to show some real upward separation from the .500 level.  

clown on computer - YouTube

  • Upvote 3
  • Haha 2
  • Downvote 2
Posted
3 minutes ago, GrayEagle said:

I agree that momentum has earned Seth another year of contract but he must keep it up.  If he wins the bowl and wins eight or more games next year then he may have turned the corner.  If he lapses back into .500 land it's not what we need for the AAC.  I'd expect that Wren has him on a short leash for next year.  If he can't win in the final season of CUSA, he surely won't win moving up.

Wasn’t everyone saying this same exact thing in December of 2020?

So is 6-6 the bar for that leash extension?   If so, I believe that bar is too low now.  (It wasn’t 6 years ago, but it is now)

  • Upvote 3
  • Downvote 1
Posted
1 minute ago, MeanGreenHoops said:

Impressive that a troll post got 3 pages of responses.

I’m not so sure Vito is trolling?  I think he means it.   And there are several people that are right there with him… some probably would be fine with an extension.

  • Upvote 3
  • Eye Roll 1
Posted
9 minutes ago, MeanGreenTexan said:

I’m not so sure Vito is trolling?  I think he means it.   And there are several people that are right there with him… some probably would be fine with an extension.

I have not seen one mention of an extension. Keep looking.

  • Upvote 2
Posted
33 minutes ago, Wag Tag said:

No it is pathetic, because it is what you attempt to use to justify your point. You up play the losses and downplay the victories. How any fan can downplay wins over 2 bowl teams and one in the top 25 is bull _ _ _ ! As far as fan base ,"Just win baby"!

We beat 5 FBS teams this season. Only one of those teams was good. That's just the facts.

UTEP was not a good win. UTEP got into a bowl but did it by only beating the bums on their schedule (New Mexico State 2-10, New Mexico 3-9, ODU 6-6, Southern Miss 3-9, LA Tech 3-9, & Rice 4-8). UTEP didn't beat a single team with a winning record this season. I look at the quality of the wins and losses. I can't help it if that isn't favorable to us. The facts justify my point. Had we beaten UAB by 30, we'd be a much better team with a much better record. I'd be off Littrell's back, and we wouldn't need to have this discussion. Unfortunately, Seth hasn't done his job and the data proves it.

  • Upvote 3
  • Thanks 2
  • Oh Boy! 1
  • Eye Roll 1
  • Downvote 1
Posted (edited)
44 minutes ago, MeanGreenTexan said:

Yes.   We’re you there?   Were you paying attention to the game?

Couldn't agree more. It was a perfect storm for UNT to pick up that win (no pun intended). We played FIU the week before in a rainstorm at Miami. UTSA is a dome team and wasn't prepared for the conditions. The pressure of being undefeated was getting to them, and our players and crowd were pumped.  Everything snowballed against UTSA that day, and they quit by halftime. In my opinion, it was the only quality win we had this season.

Edited by Side.Show.Joe
  • Upvote 1
  • Eye Roll 1
  • Downvote 1
Posted (edited)
49 minutes ago, MeanGreenTexan said:

Wasn’t everyone saying this same exact thing in December of 2020?

So is 6-6 the bar for that leash extension?   If so, I believe that bar is too low now.  (It wasn’t 6 years ago, but it is now)

Yup. Old Denton isn't interested in holding Littrell to a standard. They just want to keep moving the goal posts.

Goalpost.gif&f=1&nofb=1

Sorry. I couldn't find a gif where the posts are being moved closer so the ball will cross.

Edited by Side.Show.Joe
  • Upvote 2
  • Haha 1
  • Downvote 2
Posted
50 minutes ago, MeanGreenTexan said:

Yes.   We’re you there?   Were you paying attention to the game?

I was there, in the cold, wind, and rain the entire game. We dominated them in “all three phases”. Maybe they gave up towards the end but we pounced on them early and never let them come up for air. Maybe we watched different games. There was a time where a win like that would’ve excited this fanbase. I guess that, like me, is just OldDenton.

  • Upvote 8
  • Downvote 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Side.Show.Joe said:

None of the Old Denton crowd want to talk about the first half of the season when we were facing real competition. They don't believe Littrell should be judged based on what he did against good teams.

You love to talk about old Denton vs new Denton, which could mean a lot of different things.

What is your definitions?

  • Upvote 2
Posted
1 hour ago, Side.Show.Joe said:

It's pathetic to justify mediocrity. If Littrell is back next season, it will be a very divided fan base and board.

It will only be divided because you and your faction want it that way. You talk about ignoring the first half of the season when you ignore the first half of Littrell’s tenure.

  • Upvote 3
  • Downvote 1
Posted
15 minutes ago, Side.Show.Joe said:

We beat 5 FBS teams this season. Only one of those teams was good. That's just the facts.

UTEP was not a good win. UTEP got into a bowl but did it by only beating the bums on their schedule (New Mexico State 2-10, New Mexico 3-9, ODU 6-6, Southern Miss 3-9, LA Tech 3-9, & Rice 4-8). UTEP didn't beat a single team with a winning record this season. I look at the quality of the wins and losses. I can't help it if that isn't favorable to us. The facts justify my point. Had we beaten UAB by 30, we'd be a much better team with a much better record. I'd be off Littrell's back, and we wouldn't need to have this discussion. Unfortunately, Seth hasn't done his job and the data proves it.

You prove my point you downplay the wins couldn’t you also do it for the loses? We lost to 4 bowl teams with SMU being ranked at one time and UAB beating a top 13 ranked team and Rice beat UAB! Y’all keep going 6-6, what is important is the 5 straight and going to a bowl game! Momentum is keeping his job.

  • Upvote 4
  • Downvote 1
Posted (edited)
16 minutes ago, GrandGreen said:

You love to talk about old Denton vs new Denton, which could mean a lot of different things.

What is your definitions?

Basically, if you think .500 after 6 seasons is good enough to coach at UNT, you are Old Denton.

If you believe zero conference championship, zero bowl wins, and a .500 record after 6 seasons isn't good enough to keep you happy, and you want change... you are New Denton.

It's not about age or even how many years you've been a fan. It is about standards. McCasland is New Denton.

Edited by Side.Show.Joe
  • Upvote 2
  • Thanks 1
  • Eye Roll 3
Posted
16 minutes ago, Side.Show.Joe said:

Yup. Old Denton isn't interested in holding Littrell to a standard. They just want to keep moving the goal posts.

Goalpost.gif&f=1&nofb=1

Sorry. I couldn't find a gif where the posts are being moved closer so the ball will cross.

Pot meet kettle. 

"Littrell can't beat winning programs."

*UNT beats undefeated, ranked UTSA*

"Well it was raining so that win doesn't count."

  • Upvote 7
  • Haha 2
  • Downvote 2
Posted
5 hours ago, UNT 90 Grad said:

if you think Seth did the same thing over and over again this season and didn’t change game plans, you weren’t paying attention.  The point so many are making is that Seth seemed to learn something and this program may benefit from Seth’s growth as a coach.    The premise is that he is not the same coach that started the season.  He’s gotten better and showed potential to keep getting better.  

Coaches get paid to make in-game and in-season adjustments.  The yearly record RESULTS however are the same = .500.

If that's all we want from a coach and the program is to be average and .500, then as Vito says we have found our man!

  • Upvote 2
  • Eye Roll 2
Posted
5 minutes ago, Cr1028 said:

It will only be divided because you and your faction want it that way. You talk about ignoring the first half of the season when you ignore the first half of Littrell’s tenure.

The way I see it, your faction wants it divided. I'm not ignoring the first half of Littrell's tenure. I count all of those bowl losses, and the zero conference titles he won at that time too.

We have a different standard of success. Nothing is going to change that.

  • Upvote 2
  • Downvote 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, Wag Tag said:

You prove my point you downplay the wins couldn’t you also do it for the loses? We lost to 4 bowl teams with SMU being ranked at one time and UAB beating a top 13 ranked team and Rice beat UAB! Y’all keep going 6-6, what is important is the 5 straight and going to a bowl game! Momentum is keeping his job.

It's all important. And the overall total of Littrell's body of work (the wins and the losses) just isn't good enough.

  • Upvote 2
  • Downvote 1
Posted
Just now, Side.Show.Joe said:

Basically, if you think .500 after 6 seasons is good enough to coach at UNT, you are Old Denton.

If you believe zero conference championship, bowl wins, and a .500 record after 6 seasons isn't good enough to keep you happy, you are New Denton.

It's not about age or even how many years you've been a fan. It is about standards. McCasland is New Denton.

Well I guess I am old-new Denton.

Because I accept and agree Littrell should coach NT next year, but I am not happy about the last three year record.

Your definition than is essentially old Denton is what you disagree with and new Denton is how you think it should be. 

 

  • Upvote 6
  • Confused 1
  • Downvote 2
Posted
3 minutes ago, UNTcrazy727 said:

Pot meet kettle. 

"Littrell can't beat winning programs."

*UNT beats undefeated, ranked UTSA*

"Well it was raining so that win doesn't count."

I clearly stated that the UTSA win was our only quality win. Just because I pointed out that we had advantages in that game doesn't discount the fact that it was a quality win.

  • Upvote 2
  • Thanks 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love GoMeanGreen.com? Tell a friend!
  • What's going on Mean Green?

    1. 15

      How 'Bout Some Blame For The BOR?

    2. 25

      WBB at Houston (11/24/24)

    3. 6

      Cotton, Vice And Mason

    4. 51

      What is this program missing?

    5. 36

      AAC Trend - Year 2 of 5 Firings

  • Popular Contributors

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      15,479
    • Most Online
      1,865

    Newest Member
    meangreen0015
    Joined
  • Most Points

    1. 1
    2. 2
      NT80
      NT80
      130,188
    3. 3
      KingDL1
      KingDL1
      128,415
    4. 4
      greenminer
      greenminer
      118,705
    5. 5
      TheReal_jayD
      TheReal_jayD
      105,084
  • Biggest Gamblers

    1. 1
      EdtheEagle
      EdtheEagle
      26,589,381
    2. 2
      UNTLifer
      UNTLifer
      4,156,819
    3. 3
      untphd
      untphd
      779,513
    4. 4
      flyonthewall
      flyonthewall
      670,422
    5. 5
      3_n_out
      3_n_out
      578,480
    6. 6
    7. 7
    8. 8
    9. 9
    10. 10
      outoftown
      outoftown
      314,541
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Please review our full Privacy Policy before using our site.