Jump to content

DRC exclusive : UNT finalizes contract with Wren Baker

Brett Vito

By Brett Vito
in Mean Green Football

 Share

Recommended Posts

Green Lantern Veteran

Green Lantern

Posted
Posted
44 minutes ago, greenminer said:

Another thought:

I speculate this has less to do with Wren's accomplishments, and more about sending a message to the AAC that we mean business.

Also if we’re willing to pony up $700,000 for our AD, what are we capable of shelling out for the next football coach to get a statement hire?

  • Upvote 1
akriesman Mentor

akriesman

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, Green Lantern said:

Also if we’re willing to pony up $700,000 for our AD, what are we capable of shelling out for the next football coach to get a statement hire?

I get sick to my stomach every time I hear the words "pony up".

  • Upvote 1
  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 3
  • Ray 1
UNTLifer Grand Master

UNTLifer

Posted
Posted
5 hours ago, NorthTexasWeLove said:

Reason and logic. It's a rarity around here sometimes.  

About as rare as you showing up with any sort of praise for the department when there is success?

  • Upvote 2
UNTLifer Grand Master

UNTLifer

Posted
Posted (edited)
16 hours ago, TheColonyEagle said:

This is going to ruffle people but what if he never hires a good football coach to turn the program around? We don't know if it's deserved yet. What AD gets a huge raise because the golf program got a training facility?

It's all football. It's the only thing that matters. You say he's not the Football Director? Bull Schnikes....he is the football director. Because football is all that matters. The only reason you build all that stuff...is to complement or pump up the football program. And if that fancy new indoor facility (that he absolutely gets a ton of credit for no doubt) doesn't lead us to winning conference championships and top 25 rankings and NY6 type bowls....then why build it? There's a reason head football coaches make a lot more money than their bosses.....because Football is everything to an athletic department. And right now our everything is an absolute train wreck. Under his watch by the way.

Don't misunderstand me....I like Wren, I'm thrilled he's here. He gives me hope and I hope he's here a long time (which means he will have turned the football program around) But to use a standard that should be used to make this a top athletic program, you could easily argue Wren Baker does not deserve this raise yet. He hasn't turned around the only program that matters in his department. He may earn it in a few years for sure. But if Wren Baker leaves here and our football program doesn't make huge improvements, Wren Baker will have failed. That's still a possibility. 

He has a LOT to prove yet. And it all hinges on this hire coming up. 

I agree, but I also realize the AD is responsible for all programs under their direction.  I trust him to make the right hire and to complete his vision for facilities and the department as a whole. That is a tall order but he has yet to do anything to make me doubt him. 
A couple of weeks ago some on here were calling for him to be given his walking papers, yet behind the scenes he was working with Smatresk to secure our conference future. It wasn't a reactionary move either as they had the foresight to start the process over a year ago. 
Yes, there is a big hire on the horizon. I have a feeling he’s had a list of potential candidates for a while and this won’t be a reactionary move either. 

Edited by UNTLifer
  • Upvote 2
NorthTexasWeLove Grand Master

NorthTexasWeLove

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, UNTLifer said:

About as rare as you showing up with any sort of praise for the department when there is success?

Throwing money, P5 money at that, at our AD is not success. It's stupidity, especially considering the monies that will need to be pushed around soon. But, excuse me. 

  • Upvote 1
  • RV 1
  • Sad 1
  • Eye Roll 1
  • Downvote 1
UNTLifer Grand Master

UNTLifer

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, NorthTexasWeLove said:

Throwing money, P5 money at that, at our AD is not success. It's stupidity, especially considering the monies that will need to be pushed around soon. But, excuse me. 

Wonder Woman Reaction GIF

  • Upvote 1
  • Eye Roll 1
UNTLifer Grand Master

UNTLifer

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, NorthTexasWeLove said:

Great rebuttal. Noted. 

Just referencing the fact you decided to deflect and not address what I posted. Nice debate skills. 

  • Upvote 2
UNT Mean Green Proficient

UNT Mean Green

Posted
Posted
22 hours ago, TheColonyEagle said:

Is giving a big raise to an AD before he ever hires a football coach equal to giving a big raise to a HC with little to no wins against FBS winning teams?

Just curious....

 

19 hours ago, TheColonyEagle said:

This is going to ruffle people but what if he never hires a good football coach to turn the program around? We don't know if it's deserved yet. What AD gets a huge raise because the golf program got a training facility?

It's all football. It's the only thing that matters. You say he's not the Football Director? Bull Schnikes....he is the football director. Because football is all that matters. The only reason you build all that stuff...is to complement or pump up the football program. And if that fancy new indoor facility (that he absolutely gets a ton of credit for no doubt) doesn't lead us to winning conference championships and top 25 rankings and NY6 type bowls....then why build it? There's a reason head football coaches make a lot more money than their bosses.....because Football is everything to an athletic department. And right now our everything is an absolute train wreck. Under his watch by the way.

Don't misunderstand me....I like Wren, I'm thrilled he's here. He gives me hope and I hope he's here a long time (which means he will have turned the football program around) But to use a standard that should be used to make this a top athletic program, you could easily argue Wren Baker does not deserve this raise yet. He hasn't turned around the only program that matters in his department. He may earn it in a few years for sure. But if Wren Baker leaves here and our football program doesn't make huge improvements, Wren Baker will have failed. That's still a possibility. 

He has a LOT to prove yet. And it all hinges on this hire coming up. 

The purpose of this level of compensation is a strong commitment primarily about continuity & retention; and ultimately continuing to deliver step by step on the Master Plan laid out in 2018. There has been a TON of progress made, anyone who argues this is negligent; yet there is still a long ways to go. University leadership and the high percentage of our fanbase (and our peers) have the utmost confidence in Wren Baker and his team to continue leading this initiative. Wren has been approached about several AD jobs (multiple SEC opportunities already), and we need to do what we can to keep him. Thankful for our administrations commitment to enhancing athletics at UNT. 

Not to mention, for prospective football coaching candidates and their agents, wouldn't they want an opportunity to work for the person hiring them for the majority of their tenure at UNT?

  • Upvote 1
  • Thanks 2
  • Skeptical Eagle 1
TheColonyEagle Grand Master

TheColonyEagle

Posted
Posted
40 minutes ago, UNT Mean Green said:

 

The purpose of this level of compensation is a strong commitment primarily about continuity & retention; and ultimately continuing to deliver step by step on the Master Plan laid out in 2018. There has been a TON of progress made, anyone who argues this is negligent; yet there is still a long ways to go. University leadership and the high percentage of our fanbase (and our peers) have the utmost confidence in Wren Baker and his team to continue leading this initiative. Wren has been approached about several AD jobs (multiple SEC opportunities already), and we need to do what we can to keep him. Thankful for our administrations commitment to enhancing athletics at UNT. 

Not to mention, for prospective football coaching candidates and their agents, wouldn't they want an opportunity to work for the person hiring them for the majority of their tenure at UNT?

That changes things a little. I wasn't aware of that. Are you saying an SEC team reached out to him for an AD job? He's already been a Deputy AD at an SEC school. 

  • Upvote 1
MGNation92 Veteran

MGNation92

Posted
Posted
46 minutes ago, TheColonyEagle said:

That changes things a little. I wasn't aware of that. Are you saying an SEC team reached out to him for an AD job? He's already been a Deputy AD at an SEC school. 

Considering he's now making as much as some high level P5 jobs, it wouldn't surprise me one bit.

UNT Mean Green Proficient

UNT Mean Green

Posted
Posted
On 11/3/2021 at 12:36 PM, TheColonyEagle said:

That changes things a little. I wasn't aware of that. Are you saying an SEC team reached out to him for an AD job? He's already been a Deputy AD at an SEC school. 

Yes, there have been two cases of that during his tenure at UNT, along with a host of others reaching out as their AD position came open. Wren has earned that respect in the industry. Ideally, with a star employee like Wren Baker, you want to make it really hard for him / them to leave (in this case, probably compensate him near parity with his top 3-4 desired jobs in the country), where he would only go to one of his "dream" destinations. 

  • Upvote 1
greenminer Grand Master

greenminer

Posted
Posted
On 11/3/2021 at 12:36 PM, TheColonyEagle said:

That changes things a little. I wasn't aware of that. Are you saying an SEC team reached out to him for an AD job? He's already been a Deputy AD at an SEC school. 

I think he was strongly considered for the Mizzu position.

  • Upvote 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Tell a friend

    Love GoMeanGreen.com? Tell a friend!

  • What's going on Mean Green?

    1. 7

      Portal Commit Tracker Thread 12/21

      Being reported by Vito
      UNTLifer in UNT Football Recruiting
    2. 4

      Auburn warns of potential ticket price hike ahead of revenue-sharing model

      Yeah, while 10k students may be okay with this, the other 36k may not be happy about it at all, especially when all 46k are complaining about how expensive college has become. Having 15-20k students picketing to drop football doesn't help recruiting or TP enticements.
      meaniegreenie in Mean Green Football
    3. 4

      Auburn warns of potential ticket price hike ahead of revenue-sharing model

      I'm not for paying any player until binding contracts happen which ensures they stay a set amount of time (including Bowls) unless contractually agreed to terminate. A paid education should also be considered a part of the "salary"!
      NT80 in Mean Green Football
    4. 2

      Why was Odom retained?

      Just win. Figure out a way to get a fresh trophy in Denton. GMG
      • 2
      • Thanks
      • Eye Roll
      NM Green in Mean Green Football
    5. 4

      Auburn warns of potential ticket price hike ahead of revenue-sharing model

      Most of y'all know more about the details of NIL since I really haven't been interested in looking into it, but I've got to wonder how much longer this NIL sham is going to go on before it becomes payment. Has it officially been changed/recognized by the NCAA that it is no longer based on actual usage of N.I.L.? It was obvious from the get-go that NIL was simply a stepping stone toward direct player payment (above the table) but I don't know if the NCAA has finally changed the rules to make it that way. I may be missing some areas, but the only two places that I see where NIL is used "en masse" is in the video games and TV broadcasts. Otherwise, the only other way I see their true N.I.L. revenue being earned is for a player to directly sell their "usage", i.e. advertisements, t-shirts, autographs, photos, etc. So, I found the following regarding EA and TV. Apparently, this accounts for essentially NONE of the NIL payment to players. A mere $600 from EA and NOTHING from TV. So, then we have the collectives, which have essentially created an opaqueness to the traceability, allowing funds to be built up and then distributed without any basis of NIL usage. If you start forcing fans to pay into this collective w/o any form of ACCOUNTING, AUDITING, etc., I suspect there will soon be lawsuits from the fans demanding to know that the collected money is being spent on the player wearing their team's jersey this year (or in this specific game when hit with a concession fee). I think the collectives are also going to face some challenges when the money starts spanning seasons and the portal has players moving on after a year, i.e. you're paying into a collective for player X, but now he's moved on to another team. Kinda' like coaches contracts, is money still being paid to a player in delayed form after he's moved? Again, w/o any accounting/auditing, they may be in for some trouble. Similarly, what about when a player that's collecting (forced) NIL decides to not play in the post season? I suppose it could be argued that he is past the "season ticket" purchase, but there is always more charges to the season ticket package purchase than just the individual games, so it could be argued that your "season" purchase literally means for the entire season. As usual, the big winners are going to be lawyers, both in lawsuits and in writing the 5000 page Terms Of Service 3pt font that's going to accompany every ticket. It'll be interesting to see how they squeeze all of that text onto the bottom of the Hot Dog and Coke menu board at the concession stand.
      • 1
      • Upvote
      meaniegreenie in Mean Green Football

  • Popular Contributors

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      15,504
    • Most Online
      1,865
    Jepper
    Newest Member
    Jepper
    Joined

  • Most Points

    1. 1
      El Paso Eagle
      El Paso Eagle
      169,924
    2. 2
      NT80
      NT80
      136,513
    3. 3
      KingDL1
      KingDL1
      130,805
    4. 4
      greenminer
      greenminer
      123,695
    5. 5
      TheReal_jayD
      TheReal_jayD
      108,804

  • Biggest Gamblers

    1. 1
      EdtheEagle
      EdtheEagle
      26,590,947
    2. 2
      UNTLifer
      UNTLifer
      4,480,984
    3. 3
      untphd
      untphd
      841,051
    4. 4
      flyonthewall
      flyonthewall
      670,422
    5. 5
      3_n_out
      3_n_out
      578,480
    6. 6
      SteaminWillieBeamin
    7. 7
      cousin oliver
      cousin oliver
      448,120
    8. 8
      UNT_FH_FR_YR
      UNT_FH_FR_YR
      389,039
    9. 9
      meangreenfaninno
    10. 10
      South Texas Green

WE BELIEVE IN THE MEAN GREEN!

News

Recruiting

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Please review our full Privacy Policy before using our site.