***OFFICIAL UNT vs. La.Tech Game Thread****
-
Who's Online 23 Members, 4 Anonymous, 225 Guests (See full list)
-
Images
-
Tell a friend
-
What's going on Mean Green?
-
38
Would You Really Rather Talk NIL/Transfer Portal
I get the culture part of it, but it isn't as big of a thing as some make it out to be. Look at UTSA as a prime example. They had consistent winning before this last year and it increased their attendance. -
19
State of College Football
No one watches the Bowl game either....yet there they are. Given the numbers in the G5s and the markets we're in, I would think more eyeballs would be available for a G5 playoff vs FCS. -
19
State of College Football
Pretty sure the auto bid is going to go away after 2026 anyway. -
12
Impressive ECU win
I don’t think they were ever that valid except for top 15 teams. The New Years 6 Bowls were the only bowls that had history you average player at that time relished playing in. The bowl tie-ins are convoluted now. It used to be that if you won your conference or got second place you knew what bowl that level of accomplishment would send you. Now you don’t have a clue. Look at Army and Navy from our conference. Army should have gotten a more prestigious bowl and opponent than Navy. (Remember Bowls were assigned before the Army vs Navy game and Army is our conference champion). -
38
Would You Really Rather Talk NIL/Transfer Portal
Definitely a HUGE part of it but lots of other programs that don’t win consistently have better game day participation by their students for on campus football games. It just a lack of vision by our university when it comes to athletics in general. The new stadium should have been more centrally located than Fouts or just built on top of it. I pushed back and others calling our students “weirdos in another thread. General it seems like the Adminstration doesn’t understand the harder you make it to get to games that we don’t win the fewer the amount of people/students will show up. If DATCU was across the street from the SuperPit or in the footprint of the old Fry Street area, I think you would see an average of 10% more students actually inside the stadiums. The Fry Street area would have been harder to acquire and building within the Fouts (and adjacent parking lot) footprint may have required borrowing another stadium for a year or two. But it would have been worth it in the long term and significant because it would be a symbol that athletics are an essential part of the experience they want to provide traditional on campus students. Winning helps but fixing the culture takes more than just that. And fixing the culture is the only way you can have a down season or two that doesn’t turn into 5 or 10 bad season.
-
-
Popular Contributors
-
1
-
2
-
3
.jpg.2c34139d28f511fc91b929fa21c6b081.thumb.jpg.34e326535d3dc1a502adf551cec2bd5a.jpg)
-
4
-
5
-
-
Member Statistics
-
Most Points
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
-
Biggest Gamblers
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
-
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.