Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Just now, Jonnyeagle said:

Interesting to think that SMU will be the only AAC team in Texas once Houston leaves and whatnot.  Sort of puts them on and island and increases their travel costs.

I think they will add another Texas team - Rice or UTSA

  • Upvote 3
  • Haha 2
  • Eye Roll 4
Posted

This is an outstanding plan that makes a ton of sense for all involved. Furthermore, it would make sense to have playoffs for every level (P5, G5, FCS, D2, D3) so that the G5 member schools have a realistic shot at playing for a championship. It would basically be like the Texas High School playoff system. As Wren has said time and time again, geography needs to play a role, and hopefully some common sense will prevail through this realignment process.

  • Upvote 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
1 hour ago, untcampbell said:

I see 3-4 teams in the Southwest (League) Conference that won't think it is a good idea. Logic needs to replace emotion and/or elitism.

Let's combine to find the best ways to be relevant and to continue to exist.

GMG

Maybe it's time for these teams to go Independent 

Posted
2 minutes ago, El Paso Eagle said:

Maybe it's time for these teams to go Independent 

Agree....I'm sure SMU is the main one, but they don't have any leverage.

They need to be told: "Go to the Big 12 if they'll take you (they won't) or go indy"

Pretty simple

Posted
11 minutes ago, TheColonyEagle said:

Agree....I'm sure SMU is the main one, but they don't have any leverage.

They need to be told: "Go to the Big 12 if they'll take you (they won't) or go indy"

Pretty simple

An even bigger joke than SMU's mindset is UTEP's - All you hear out here is how NMSU is not good enough to be in a conference with them. It's always good for a laugh. 

Posted
4 minutes ago, El Paso Eagle said:

An even bigger joke than SMU's mindset is UTEP's - All you hear out here is how NMSU is not good enough to be in a conference with them. It's always good for a laugh. 

La Tech does the exact same thing to ULM

Posted
2 minutes ago, El Paso Eagle said:

An even bigger joke than SMU's mindset is UTEP's - All you hear out here is how NMSU is not good enough to be in a conference with them. It's always good for a laugh. 

The moves by the SEC and now Big 12 were the last straw with me...I've changed myself. Texas State...come on in. La Tech is going to have to change on La Monroe, SMU on us, I'm sure UAB on Troy, Probably USF on FAU, UTEP on NMSU, Memphis on Ark St., etc.

  • Thanks 3
Posted (edited)

I could absolutely get behind this.

Southwest League (16)

Division 1
Tulsa
SMU
North Texas
UTSA
Texas State
Rice
Arkansas State
Memphis

Division 2

Louisiana Tech
Louisiana
Louisiana-Monroe
Tulane
UAB
Southern Miss
Troy
South Alabama

 

7 division games, 2 crossovers, 3 OOC? Conf championship game followed by a playoff? I'm in. Looks like 4 "leagues" champ from each one in playoff to start. I think that would get attention.

Edited by TheColonyEagle
  • Upvote 4
Posted
13 minutes ago, TheColonyEagle said:

I could absolutely get behind this.

Southwest League (16)

Division 1
Tulsa
SMU
North Texas
UTSA
Texas State
Rice
Arkansas State
Memphis

Division 2

Louisiana Tech
Louisiana
Louisiana-Monroe
Tulane
UAB
Southern Miss
Troy
South Alabama

 

7 division games, 2 crossovers, 3 OOC? Conf championship game followed by a playoff? I'm in. Looks like 4 "leagues" champ from each one in playoff to start. I think that would get attention.

This would be a dream come true...

Posted

Here's a thought. If your speaking to someone who is a fan of a G5 school and they are complaining about the problems with the P5, etc. - As them if they support regionalized G5 conferences. If they say no, walk away and tell them to stop complaining. 

Posted
16 minutes ago, TheColonyEagle said:

I could absolutely get behind this.

Southwest League (16)

Division 1
Tulsa
SMU
North Texas
UTSA
Texas State
Rice
Arkansas State
Memphis

Division 2

Louisiana Tech
Louisiana
Louisiana-Monroe
Tulane
UAB
Southern Miss
Troy
South Alabama

 

7 division games, 2 crossovers, 3 OOC? Conf championship game followed by a playoff? I'm in. Looks like 4 "leagues" champ from each one in playoff to start. I think that would get attention.

Since SMU and La Tech are the ones who would most likely complain - swap them out with each other and lets keep moving.

  • Upvote 2
Posted
14 minutes ago, greenminer said:

Lots of pleas for logic here, but do we know what they [league officials] actually want?

Everyone's has several that they like and they have to take one for the league that they don't like.  Everyone can't be totally satisfied.

  • Upvote 1
Posted

It would work except for some schools seeing themselves as "above" others.  La Tech would never be in a conference with La Monroe.  Same for New Mexico agreeing to be in a conference with New Mexico State.  SMU would rather cancel the program than join the conference suggested.

There is also the whole public vs private schools problem.  Many private schools maintain an attitude of superiority and would refuse to be in a conference with public/state schools.

It looks great on paper, but it will NEVER happen.

 

Posted

This just dropped an hour ago on Sports Illustrated:

https://www.si.com/college/2021/09/08/big-12-expansion-aac-mike-aresco-reaction

Quote

Though Aresco declined to reveal potential new members, the top options are likely to start with UAB, a rising power in the G5 located in the heart of the Deep South. Football success is an important piece to any new additions, as well as fan support and school resources. Several others may fit that mold, including Air Force, Army, Colorado State, Boise State, North Texas, Charlotte, Coastal Carolina and Arkansas State.

 

Posted

A regional alignment for the G5 schools makes perfect sense. Theres no reason for absurd travel costs with little profit. Make leagues that fans can travel to and where regional rivalries can flourish. The MAC has the right idea as far as a G5 regional league goes.

  • Upvote 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Please review our full Privacy Policy before using our site.