Jump to content

DRC: Best-case, worst-case scenarios for North Texas in 2021

Brett Vito

By Brett Vito
in Mean Green Football

 Share

Recommended Posts

untjim1995 Grand Master

untjim1995

Posted
Posted (edited)

We should be somewhere in the middle of this, unless injuries just pile up or the team quits on SL, which would make 2-10 very possible. I just don't see how a defense that was dead-ass last in the entire country can improve itself enough while playing an even harder schedule than we played last year. We will see improvement on defense, but I bet it will be later in the year that the improvement shows, as the players get more used to his scheme and, most importantly, the schedule lightens up some.

Again, we have two games that I fully expect to win or the season will be SL's last here--NW State and UTEP. After that, there are really 4 other opponents that I think we can beat (Rice, USM, FIU, Marshall). If we win 2 of those, that gets SL to 4 wins and I believe that this will be enough for him to get one last year to try and turn it all around. The other 6, SMU, Mizzou, Liberty, UAB, La Tech, and UTSA are all just way ahead of us right now.

That last name, UTSA, is the salt in the wound, as it was just two years ago that they were flailing with a coach who was dead man walking on the sideline, Frank Wilson, and we clobbered them at Apogee 42-3, They replace him with a guy who has all these connections with TX HS Coaches and in Year One has them zoom right by us. That's a most bitter pill to swallow--I realize we are their Super Bowl every year, but they have the momentum we got when we hired SL here and overtook them in their supposed year of prominence, 2017, that crushed their program afterwards until their terrible coach got fired. That this switched on us so fast is just unbelievable...and frankly, pathetic.

Edited by untjim1995
  • Upvote 7
  • Downvote 1
MeanGreenTexan Grand Master

MeanGreenTexan

Posted
Posted

I think a realistic best case scenario for NT would be a 2013-like season. 
A rough start, but hitting their stride mid-season, and putting themselves in a position to win the West.  Then finally getting over that bowl game hump.

I think a realistic worst-case scenario for NT would be a 2010-like season where Littrell just can't get much going and loses the team.  Bloesch steps up and tries to make his case for being HC, only to win 2 games against UTEP & FIU.  People around here would think he should be HC too.   "Lock the Gate!"

  • Upvote 3
  • Sad 1
Udomann Grand Master

Udomann

Posted
Posted
10 minutes ago, MeanGreenTexan said:

I think a realistic worst-case scenario for NT would be a 2010-like season where Littrell just can't get much going and loses the team.  Bloesch steps up and tries to make his case for being HC, only to win 2 games against UTEP & FIU.  People around here would think he should be HC too.   "Lock the Gate!"

Well thanks, my PTSD just set in.

image.png.06058dcba549793015b443050a7d4379.png

  • Upvote 1
  • Haha 4
  • RV 1
97and03 Grand Master

97and03

Posted
Posted
54 minutes ago, untjim1995 said:

We should be somewhere of the middle of this, unless injuries just pile up or the team quits on SL, which would make 2-10 very possible. I just don't see how a defense that was dead-ass last in the entire country can improve itself enough while playing an even harder schedule than we played last year. We will see improvement on defense, but I bet it will be later in the year that the improvement shows, as the players get more used to his scheme and, most importantly, the schedule lightens up some.

Again, we have two ins that I fully expect to win or the season will be SL's last here--NW State and UTEP. After that, there are really 4 other opponents that I think we can beat (Rice, USM, FIU, Marshall). If we win 2 of those, that gets SL to 4 wins and I believe that this will be enough for him to get one last year to try and turn it all around. The other 6, SMU, Mizzou, Liberty, UAB, La Tech, and UTSA are all just way ahead of us right now.

That last name, UTSA, is the salt in the wound, as it was just two years ago that they were flailing with a coach who was dead man walking on the sideline, Frank Wilson, and we clobbered them at Apogee 42-3, They replace him with a guy who has all these connections with TX HS Coaches and in Year One has them zoom right by us. That's a most bitter pill to swallow--I realize we are their Super Bowl every year, but they have the momentum we got when we hired SL here and overtook them in their supposed year of prominence, 2017, that crushed their program afterwards until their terrible coach got fired. That this switched on us so fast is just unbelievable...and frankly, pathetic.

I think LaTech, although on the road, could be easier than Marshall. But who knows?

  • Upvote 4
NT93 Grand Master

NT93

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, Mean Green Matt said:

Somewhere between 0-12 and 15-0 I’m guessing. 

This is the kind of quality insight you can only get here🤣🤣

  • Haha 4
WanderingEagle Proficient

WanderingEagle

Posted
Posted

We were a top 10 offense in college football last year. Put a bad to mediocre defense on the field as opposed to literally the worst defense in the country and you're talking the possibility of anywhere from 6-9 wins. 2017 D gave up 6.07 yards per play, 440 yards per game and allowed 942 plays. They were one of the worst units in the country in terms of getting off the field on third down. But our offense was 19th in the country and we could score, so as long as we could hang 30-40 in a given matchup we had a chance week after week.

Same thing this year. Sky isn't falling. If we win some games we aren't supposed to there's a 8-9 win season and a possible West division push on the table. 

The worst case scenario is we win 4-5 games and just underachieve. This team is too talented to lose 9 or more, especially on offense. I think what matters is not how much we lose but how we lose. I will not be mad in the slightest if this team goes 5-7 with like one blowout max. I'll be upset but I am dead tired of watching us get steamrolled. FAU 2x, Troy, Utah State, SMU every year other than 18, UTSA 20, App State..... I'm tired of it. I think we all are. I honestly, genuinely care way more about how we lose this year more than the record. 

  • Upvote 6
Green Lantern Veteran

Green Lantern

Posted
Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, WanderingEagle said:

I will not be mad in the slightest if this team goes 5-7 with like one blowout max. I'll be upset but I am dead tired of watching us get steamrolled. FAU 2x, Troy, Utah State, SMU every year other than 18, UTSA 20, App State..... I'm tired of it. I think we all are. I honestly, genuinely care way more about how we lose this year more than the record. 

No way. I like Seth as a coach & personally  - I fondly remember traveling to Boca for the Conference Title game & haven’t written him off like some have - but if he can’t win at least 6 in the regular season this far into his tenure, we need to look at other options.
 

No excuses on the schedule either. No game is un-winnable, though there are several tough tests.

Edited by Green Lantern
  • Upvote 2
  • Downvote 1
WanderingEagle Proficient

WanderingEagle

Posted
Posted
23 minutes ago, Green Lantern said:

No way. I like Seth as a coach & personally  - I fondly remember traveling to Boca for the Conference Title game & haven’t written him off like some have - but if he can’t win at least 6 in the regular season this far into his tenure, we need to look at other options.
 

No excuses on the schedule either. No game in un-winnable, though there are several tough tests.

I agree with everything you said, but the thing is UNT doesn't fire a coach for going 5-7 after two 4 win seasons, especially when he is on contract to be here through 2023. He is not getting bought out, so he either has to win or has to do so poorly this year that our donors think it's an upward move to search elsewhere. 

This schedule has 10 winnable games I would say and 2 I would say are almost sure losses (Liberty and Mizzou). If we can win 5-6 of those "winnable" games I am happy. 

  • Upvote 2
UNT 90 Grad Grand Master

UNT 90 Grad

Posted
Posted
20 hours ago, MeanGreenTexan said:

I think a realistic best case scenario for NT would be a 2013-like season. 
A rough start, but hitting their stride mid-season, and putting themselves in a position to win the West.  Then finally getting over that bowl game hump.

I think a realistic worst-case scenario for NT would be a 2010-like season where Littrell just can't get much going and loses the team.  Bloesch steps up and tries to make his case for being HC, only to win 2 games against UTEP & FIU.  People around here would think he should be HC too.   "Lock the Gate!"

 

  • Upvote 1
  • Haha 2
  • Ray 1
  • RV 1
TheColonyEagle Grand Master

TheColonyEagle

Posted
Posted

Worst case: 2-10 - there are a bunch of winnable games but there are also a bunch of losable. FCS team and UTEP should be guaranteed wins.  The rest of our schedule is unlucky. Our home schedule is really tough. The road games are teams that are beatable but are on the road. 
 

Best case: 9-3 - who knows? Does the talent he’s brought in put it together this year? Do we stay healthy? I’ve been tough on Littrell based on the last few seasons but I would say this has to be his most talented full team and his best on both lines. Which is what wins games. If in 1 year, our D can just make the leap to below average instead of a total disaster….we should be able to score enough points to win games. I feel better about our QB situation than I have since Fine. 
 

I am really hoping we surprise some people this year. 

untlynchka1 Community Regular

untlynchka1

Posted
Posted (edited)
On 8/20/2021 at 10:54 AM, untjim1995 said:

We should be somewhere in the middle of this, unless injuries just pile up or the team quits on SL, which would make 2-10 very possible. I just don't see how a defense that was dead-ass last in the entire country can improve itself enough while playing an even harder schedule than we played last year. We will see improvement on defense, but I bet it will be later in the year that the improvement shows, as the players get more used to his scheme and, most importantly, the schedule lightens up some.

Again, we have two games that I fully expect to win or the season will be SL's last here--NW State and UTEP. After that, there are really 4 other opponents that I think we can beat (Rice, USM, FIU, Marshall). If we win 2 of those, that gets SL to 4 wins and I believe that this will be enough for him to get one last year to try and turn it all around. The other 6, SMU, Mizzou, Liberty, UAB, La Tech, and UTSA are all just way ahead of us right now.

That last name, UTSA, is the salt in the wound, as it was just two years ago that they were flailing with a coach who was dead man walking on the sideline, Frank Wilson, and we clobbered them at Apogee 42-3, They replace him with a guy who has all these connections with TX HS Coaches and in Year One has them zoom right by us. That's a most bitter pill to swallow--I realize we are their Super Bowl every year, but they have the momentum we got when we hired SL here and overtook them in their supposed year of prominence, 2017, that crushed their program afterwards until their terrible coach got fired. That this switched on us so fast is just unbelievable...and frankly, pathetic.

Ok, so my only response about the defense is

a) they tried to implement a brand new scheme with no spring or real ability to meet beforehand. On top of that, I hate the 3-3-5. For it to truly work you need more than 1 NT and d-ends that are big enough to hold the line. 
 

B) our LB’s and multiple other people missed games because of covid so we had several games with people that really didn’t know what they were doing. 
 

C) This is just pure optimism.  I’ve heard from a friend of mine that coached the Murphys’ in hs that they have put on some size, and they love DE. He worked out with them in the summer.  They are special, and they are hungry. They had 7 combined sacks in roughly half a season as d-ends on a 3-man front. What are they gonna do now that they can pin their ears back and get after the qb?????

On 8/20/2021 at 11:30 AM, MeanGreenTexan said:

I think a realistic best case scenario for NT would be a 2013-like season. 
A rough start, but hitting their stride mid-season, and putting themselves in a position to win the West.  Then finally getting over that bowl game hump.

I think a realistic worst-case scenario for NT would be a 2010-like season where Littrell just can't get much going and loses the team.  Bloesch steps up and tries to make his case for being HC, only to win 2 games against UTEP & FIU.  People around here would think he should be HC too.   "Lock the Gate!"

Man!! I was thinking about this season as well!  That 2010 team, is still, to this day, the one that I have the most what-if disappointment. We played with Clemson. They were shocked. If Nathan Tune hadn’t been lost for the season in the second game, I think that team could’ve done something. They had some talent. Especially on offense, and as much as Dodge did wrong, he put some damn good offenses on the field. It was also the first time he had what looked like a competent defense. 
 

Of course if we did win, then we would’ve never gotten rid of Dodge. Lol. So it’s a catch-22. 

Edited by untlynchka1
KingDL1 Veteran

KingDL1

Posted
Posted

My question is do we have anything resembling an offensive line? We have not had one under Littrell. Has that been addressed? 

GrandGreen Grand Master

GrandGreen

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, KingDL1 said:

My question is do we have anything resembling an offensive line? We have not had one under Littrell. Has that been addressed? 

I guess the rest of the offense must have been great, the number 1 statistical CUSA leader without an OL.

Anything can improve, but NT's issues under Littrell have been on the defensive side. 

 

  • Haha 1
Mean Green 93-98 Grand Master

Mean Green 93-98

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, KingDL1 said:

My question is do we have anything resembling an offensive line? We have not had one under Littrell. Has that been addressed? 

Are you joking?  We may not be the best in conference, but O-line play last year under Bloesch shot up significantly from what we had under Langston.  Returning as many starters as we are, I expect even better O-line play this year.

  • Upvote 4
KingDL1 Veteran

KingDL1

Posted
Posted
15 minutes ago, Mean Green 93-98 said:

Are you joking?  We may not be the best in conference, but O-line play last year under Bloesch shot up significantly from what we had under Langston.  Returning as many starters as we are, I expect even better O-line play this year.

Sorry I was not joking and I did not want to take last year as any real indication. But good to hear and I hope so. I look forward to seeing an O-line of some sort. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Tell a friend

    Love GoMeanGreen.com? Tell a friend!

  • What's going on Mean Green?

    1. 25

      Another NIL Coaching Casualty

      80,000 fans aren't necessarily the ones footing the bill for NIL, though. The issue with this current model is nobody could go to the games and nobody could watch on TV but player salaries would still be funded by big money boosters. There's no correlation between a team's revenue, or the sport's revenue as a whole, and player salaries/NIL deals. The NFL doesn't work this way. When overall viewership goes up, media deals gain value which increases media distribution to the franchises and raises salary caps with it when new media deals are signed. NFL teams are required to spend 89% of the salary cap over a 4 year span or pay the difference to their players because that money comes from media deals. The teams make most of their money from ticket sales, merchandise sales, and such but those don't pay salaries like they might in the MLB or even NBA which allows for a luxury tax when exceeding the salary cap. For the NCAA to follow a similar model where wins and losses don't matter to "school" salary pools (insane to type), you'd need an NCAA-wide media deal that pays all schools the same and a salary cap that is the same across the board determined by that media deal. I doubt it'll ever happen. We'd be right back at boosters paying players under the table. It's going to have to start with boosters getting spending fatigue to spark change.
      GMG_Dallas in Mean Green Football
    2. 2

      Athletics site shows no more Bowl tickets available?

      https://www.firstresponderbowl.com/tickets/#Fan-Tickets We may have sold out of our allotment, but their website still shows ticket availability.
      GMG24 in Mean Green Football
    3. 4

      Navy Beats OU

      Fun bowl games, not quite so fun playoff games. Maybe there's still something to be said for the bowl games after all.
      • 1
      • Upvote
      Mean Green 93-98 in Mean Green Football
    4. 25

      Another NIL Coaching Casualty

      It will take some time for the fans of these schools to adjust to losing a few games a year when they're in the new "P2" consisting of maybe 40 teams max. However, filling an average 80k stadium for maybe 20 games/wk is only about 1.5M people demanding tickets for each week's game. Out of over 300M people, I suspect they can still keep filling the stands, other than the few days of "dud" games or bad weather. Now, I'm not sure about TV ratings, but there's so many T-shirt fans of these top 40 schools that I think they'll still watch. I hope this greed and the extreme powering of the top few schools ends up biting them in the a$$, but I'm afraid they'll be successful. I don't mind them breaking away, I just wish they'd be forced to give up any relation to the school. Go create a stand-alone semi-pro league independent of the universities. I haven't followed pro sports in decades, but my quick check shows the Cowboys have been varying between 6-9 and 13-3 for the past 20 years with minimal playoff success but from what I hear, they have plenty of demand for tickets, even when they suck. I realize they are a somewhat special team, but then again, so are these P2 teams, so I think the comparison is reasonably legit.
      meaniegreenie in Mean Green Football
    5. 4

      Navy Beats OU

      Lot of fun bowl games so far. Toledo vs Pitt last night was incredible. This was another great game as well.
      • 2
      • Upvote
      GMG_Dallas in Mean Green Football

  • Popular Contributors

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      15,505
    • Most Online
      1,865
    Jepper
    Newest Member
    Jepper
    Joined

  • Most Points

    1. 1
      El Paso Eagle
      El Paso Eagle
      170,404
    2. 2
      NT80
      NT80
      137,723
    3. 3
      KingDL1
      KingDL1
      131,640
    4. 4
      greenminer
      greenminer
      124,005
    5. 5
      TheReal_jayD
      TheReal_jayD
      109,059

  • Biggest Gamblers

    1. 1
      EdtheEagle
      EdtheEagle
      26,591,647
    2. 2
      UNTLifer
      UNTLifer
      4,480,984
    3. 3
      untphd
      untphd
      842,505
    4. 4
      flyonthewall
      flyonthewall
      670,422
    5. 5
      3_n_out
      3_n_out
      578,480
    6. 6
      SteaminWillieBeamin
    7. 7
      UNT_FH_FR_YR
      UNT_FH_FR_YR
      454,039
    8. 8
      cousin oliver
      cousin oliver
      448,120
    9. 9
      meangreenfaninno
    10. 10
      South Texas Green

WE BELIEVE IN THE MEAN GREEN!

News

Recruiting

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Please review our full Privacy Policy before using our site.