Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
8 minutes ago, RiseUNT said:

What are our odds of a play in game?

I'd go with non-existent.

 

 

As far as seeding goes, hoping for a 13.  I am predicting a 14.

Posted
Just now, CMJ said:

I'd go with non-existent.

 

 

As far as seeding goes, hoping for a 13.  I am predicting a 14.

Im with you.. I got no faith in the NCAA committee correctly placing any CUSA team after the last few years.

 

We should be a 12 or 13, but should and will are 2 different things

Posted

It's funny, I think in 2007 we had the resume of a 16 (but we had the talent of a 13 or so).  So we had a favorable seed really.  In 2010, i think we probably should have been a 14 or so, still not sure how we were relegated to the 15 line. (And yes, I know that was the Belt)

CUSA has been under seeded the last few years, even with some impressive wins.

So, who knows what they'll do with us.

Posted
3 minutes ago, CMJ said:

It's funny, I think in 2007 we had the resume of a 16 (but we had the talent of a 13 or so).  So we had a favorable seed really.  In 2010, i think we probably should have been a 14 or so, still not sure how we were relegated to the 15 line. (And yes, I know that was the Belt)

CUSA has been under seeded the last few years, even with some impressive wins.

So, who knows what they'll do with us.

We are the highest NET team and we were really affected by COVID-19 cancellations.

Posted
1 minute ago, Matt from A700 said:

Don't know how it works, but no conference champion should have to play in the First Four.

Don't they save those spots for teams with really low RPIs/NETs that somehow got on a run and won the AQ?  Teams that otherwise would not even be considered for At-large

  • Upvote 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, RiseUNT said:

We are the highest NET team and we were really affected by COVID-19 cancellations.

The NET is just one part of the formula they use.  It's a calculus.  

Posted
6 minutes ago, greenminer said:

Don't they save those spots for teams with really low RPIs/NETs that somehow got on a run and won the AQ?  Teams that otherwise would not even be considered for At-large

The last four AQs and the last four at larges play in the First Four.  Two games of each.

  • Thanks 1
Posted

Me too.  I felt bad for him that his dream job didn't work out.  Three teams to the NCAAs proves he can coach though.  Wonder if he'll ever get a higher profile gig again, or if he's gonna retire down there.  Either way, I hope he gets an NCAA win someday.  Might be this year - I can see them having to deal with a First Four game and they'd be a tough out there.

 

 

  • Upvote 3

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Please review our full Privacy Policy before using our site.