Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I guarantee you SMU goes hard after this kid... he is a perfect fit for what they are looking for in a grad transfer QB. An athlete who is used to playing at a high level and grew in an affluent community. 

  • Sad 1
  • Skeptical Eagle 1
  • 1 month later...
Posted
Just now, 97and03 said:

Should we be interested? Grad transfer DB we offered out of high school.

 

If he is half as fast as his brother I would think we have to do it just to add his speed.

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

It still amazes me how SMU pulled off all of these transfers. I know everyone believes it was cash, which is probably true, but seriously, how did puissant SMU pull this off and the rest of us aren't? Did they just realize it all first? Was Dykes just way ahead of the game on all of this?

  • Upvote 1
Posted
1 hour ago, untjim1995 said:

It still amazes me how SMU pulled off all of these transfers. I know everyone believes it was cash, which is probably true, but seriously, how did puissant SMU pull this off and the rest of us aren't? Did they just realize it all first? Was Dykes just way ahead of the game on all of this?

Yes.

Posted (edited)
4 hours ago, untjim1995 said:

It still amazes me how SMU pulled off all of these transfers. I know everyone believes it was cash, which is probably true, but seriously, how did puissant SMU pull this off and the rest of us aren't? Did they just realize it all first? Was Dykes just way ahead of the game on all of this?

Everybody has their own take on this, but 

I think Dykes realized when Buechele transferred in he had the team to win right then and there.   In 2018 SMU was 5-7, had 21 of 25 returning starters, and was a QB away from winning the AAC West, and if you win your division at SMU you have done your job. 

So when he landed Buechele he decided to go all in for the next two years, loading up on qualified transfers and getting lucky on a couple others - McBride lettered at Auburn but after the neck injury he was ghosted by 32 other programs before e-mailing us, and Stephens, the CB who covered Rico, was a 3* RB from UCLA who simply asked to walk on and was told "fine, but we need DB's not RB's so that's what you'll have to play."  So a couple guys just landed in our lap when they got passed over by everybody else.

We got a little lucky, to be honest. 

On 12/3/2019 at 8:16 PM, agw0038 said:

we need to grab that tisdale kid before SMU does

We're good at QB right now, but those DT's from Texas would find the field in a hurry right now. 

*EDIT*  Grammer

Edited by SMUleopold
  • Upvote 3
  • Thanks 1
Posted
1 hour ago, SMUleopold said:

Everybody has their own take on this, but 

I think Dykes realized when Buechele transferred in he had the team to win right then and there.   In 2018 SMU was 5-7, a QB away from winning the AAC West, and if you win you division at SMU you have done your job. 

So when he landed Buechele, and had 21 of 25 starters returning from the year before, he decided to go all in for the next two years, loading up on qualified transfers and getting lucky on a couple others - McBride lettered at Auburn but after the neck injury he was ghosted by 32 other programs before e-mailing us, and Stephens, the CB who covered Rico, was a 3* RB from UCLA who simply asked to walk on and was told "fine, but we need DB's not RB's so that's what you'll have to play."  We got a little lucky, to be honest. 

We're good at QB right now, but those DT's from Texas would fine the field in a hurry right now. 

Do you guys have some more transfers coming this fall from the portal?

Posted

The coaches have been open about looking at GT's at a couple of different positions, especially RB, DT, LB, and a CB, so I expect a few to come in some way, shape or form - we've also landed a 4* WR JUCO prospect, stealing him from TCU (hell yeah).

But a couple that we landed last year but didn't play are the intriguing ones to me - the OL from Boston College that I think is going to add some depth is a big one, and then my genuine favorite, Kedrick James, the TE who was going to start for Alabama but got kicked off the team for smocking pot.  With Proche leaving and an OL that had problems getting a strong push up front this kid could contribute to both issues, making our receiving corps even better this year.  He got hurt last year and didn't play - can't wait to take him out of the box. 

Posted
1 minute ago, SMUleopold said:

The coaches have been open about looking at GT's at a couple of different positions, especially RB, DT, LB, and a CB, so I expect a few to come in some way, shape or form - we've also landed a 4* WR JUCO prospect, stealing him from TCU (hell yeah).

But a couple that we landed last year but didn't play are the intriguing ones to me - the OL from Boston College that I think is going to add some depth is a big one, and then my genuine favorite, Kedrick James, the TE who was going to start for Alabama but got kicked off the team for smocking pot.  With Proche leaving and an OL that had problems getting a strong push up front this kid could contribute to both issues, making our receiving corps even better this year.  He got hurt last year and didn't play - can't wait to take him out of the box. 

I feel like Dykes has really found something that very few G5 programs can do--which is get GTs playing time and come play in Dallas at a school that amazingly still carries cachet in the college football world. Don't get me wrong--I hate your school like yall hate TCU--but last year really opened my eyes to just how much the NATIONAL MEDIA still holds up SMU's program. The damndest thing to me is how that Death Penalty has actually made these media members sympathetic toward yall. 

  • Upvote 2
Posted

I think Dykes has come up with a common sense approach to using GT's and DFW as a way to attract better talent, going with a simple approach to the players: 

  1. Have more than one year left of eligibility
  2. Be from DFW 
  3. Fit your teams needs and have little to no disciplinary issues (James, the TE I just mentioned, smoked pot.  Peronally, I'm fine with this, call me whatever you want)

Endless amounts of talent disappears under the depth charts in the P5 for no real reason than arbitrary judgement calls - Burrow is a prime example of this at OSU - so there's no reason there can't be a way to find talented players who are decent kids to come home once they graduate.  Honestly, there's no reason UNT couldn't clean up, either - this rule change has a chance to really level the playing field.

As far as the DP goes....

after 35 years of sucking, it's time to move on.  No reason we shouldn't be able to win and do it cleanly. 

  • Upvote 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, SMUleopold said:

I think Dykes has come up with a common sense approach to using GT's and DFW as a way to attract better talent, going with a simple approach to the players: 

  1. Have more than one year left of eligibility
  2. Be from DFW 
  3. Fit your teams needs and have little to no disciplinary issues (James, the TE I just mentioned, smoked pot.  Peronally, I'm fine with this, call me whatever you want)

Endless amounts of talent disappears under the depth charts in the P5 for no real reason than arbitrary judgement calls - Burrow is a prime example of this at OSU - so there's no reason there can't be a way to find talented players who are decent kids to come home once they graduate.  Honestly, there's no reason UNT couldn't clean up, either - this rule change has a chance to really level the playing field.

As far as the DP goes....

after 35 years of sucking, it's time to move on.  No reason we shouldn't be able to win and do it cleanly. 

As much as I hate to admit it I think you are absolutely correct in your analysis.  Dykes is a gem and his rebranding of SMU has been outstanding.

  • Upvote 1
Posted
1 hour ago, SMUleopold said:

I think Dykes has come up with a common sense approach to using GT's and DFW as a way to attract better talent, going with a simple approach to the players: 

  1. Have more than one year left of eligibility
  2. Be from DFW 
  3. Fit your teams needs and have little to no disciplinary issues (James, the TE I just mentioned, smoked pot.  Peronally, I'm fine with this, call me whatever you want)

Endless amounts of talent disappears under the depth charts in the P5 for no real reason than arbitrary judgement calls - Burrow is a prime example of this at OSU - so there's no reason there can't be a way to find talented players who are decent kids to come home once they graduate.  Honestly, there's no reason UNT couldn't clean up, either - this rule change has a chance to really level the playing field.

As far as the DP goes....

after 35 years of sucking, it's time to move on.  No reason we shouldn't be able to win and do it cleanly. 

Want to give you guys the credit deserved. I am still trying to understand the mid-term result of having so many transfers. I would think, at some point, there will be a numbers game where there are low numbers of scholarships available. 

  • Upvote 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Please review our full Privacy Policy before using our site.