The Green New Deal is not radical, but reactionary to an endangered world

[SteaminWillieBeamin]

profit == disappointment. yes. i see where you are coming from. 

 

 

[FirefightnRick]

Anyhow,....back on topic.

.

“Senate Votes Down Green New Deal Resolution 0-57”

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/03/26/senate-votes-down-green-new-deal-resolution-0-57/

 

 

Rick

[UNTLifer]

5 hours ago, SteaminWillieBeamin said:

profit == disappointment. yes. i see where you are coming from. 

 

 

Two profitable quarters to end 2018, the first back to back profitable quarters in the company's 15 years.  Q1 of 19 back to losing money.  I hope it becomes profitable because I am a fan of Musk and his ambition, but he has bled money for ever.

Green New Deal is a joke and thankfully Congress realized it.

[LongJim]

9 hours ago, UNTLifer said:

 I hope it becomes profitable because I am a fan of Musk and his ambition, but he has bled money for ever.

 

DeLorean 2.0.

Edited March 28, 2019 by LongJim

[UNTFan23]

There has been a massive overreaction to the resolution failing in the Senate. If you go and actually read it, there is no meat to it. The resolution is pretty much just a bunch of promises that will cost US taxpayers anywhere between $50 and $90+ trillion dollars over the next unknown number of years. In fact, the resolution make no reference to when all these expensive changes need to be in place.

Had the resolution passed, nothing would have changed. There were no regulations, no laws, no directive that was a part of this resolution; it was merely a promise that the federal government was going to literally force all these changes.

[LongJim]

Good article by John Stossel.

https://reason.com/2019/04/24/the-green-new-deal-will-hit-the-poor-with-higher-energy-costs/