Jump to content

19 QB Chase Griffin - Hutto

Cerebus

By Cerebus
in UNT Football Recruiting

 Share

Recommended Posts

Cerebus Experienced

Cerebus

Posted
Posted

✅ #1 2019 QB TX 5A/6A in EVERY passing category two years in a row 
✅ 4.0 NCAA Core GPA
✅ Team Captain
✅ Semper Fidelis All-American
✅ AP and TSWA All-State
✅ Jr. Season. 272-405 (67%). 4,138 Yds. 40 Tds - 4 INTs. 3 Rush TDs.

Only has Ivy League offers right now (Brown, Columbia, Cornell, Dartmouth, Brown), but at least you know he will make grades.

 

  • 2 weeks later...
GMG24 Proficient

GMG24

Posted
Posted
On 5/10/2018 at 12:49 PM, BillySee58 said:

I like it. So does this confirm Holgorsen has decommitted?

I'll take this cat over any 19 we've offered.  Kid is a gamechanger.  He could redshirt in Fines SR YEAR, and immediately replace him.

  • 3 weeks later...
UNTLifer Grand Master

UNTLifer

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, TheReal_jayD said:

I honestly thought he was headed to North Texas for sure. He committed to UCLA this morning.

Thought he was as well. UCLA is an interesting pick as they tend to way underachieve. 

  • Downvote 2
UNTLifer Grand Master

UNTLifer

Posted
Posted

Honestly, with Our depth and Finnegan delayed two years, we may not be terribly attractive compared to a program with not as much depth.  We have Fine for two more years and the. Pearson, Martin and Bean that are RS Fr or true Fr.

BillySee58 Grand Master

BillySee58

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, TheReal_jayD said:

yes that is my pick!! i have heard for a while he was Seth top choice

 

Interesting. Thanks!

 

4 hours ago, Prettylittleeagle said:

^This he's a great QB, but I bet this was a heavy factor and rightfully so. Hate to see him go, thought we might have had him...UCLA is a good home.

 

6 hours ago, UNTLifer said:

Honestly, with Our depth and Finnegan delayed two years, we may not be terribly attractive compared to a program with not as much depth.  We have Fine for two more years and the. Pearson, Martin and Bean that are RS Fr or true Fr.

I don't know what to call this, but I see it a lot on here. People think just because they can name players on our roster, that makes our depth chart better and more daunting to incoming recruits than the depth charts on other rosters. It's pretty prevalent on here, but I'm slightly surprised that it even extends to P5 teams like UCLA.

 

  • Upvote 2
  • Thanks 1
  • Downvote 1
GMG24 Proficient

GMG24

Posted
Posted
6 hours ago, TheReal_jayD said:

yes that is my pick!! i have heard for a while he was Seth top choice

 

Chip Kelly strikes again.  

  • Upvote 1
  • Downvote 1
UNTLifer Grand Master

UNTLifer

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, BillySee58 said:

Interesting. Thanks!

 

 

I don't know what to call this, but I see it a lot on here. People think just because they can name players on our roster, that makes our depth chart better and more daunting to incoming recruits than the depth charts on other rosters. It's pretty prevalent on here, but I'm slightly surprised that it even extends to P5 teams like UCLA.

 

I stated it because we have more young depth than ever before.  Plus, UCLA is a "P5" in LA.  I know you are the recruiting expert, but there are different opinions on this board that are also valid.

  • Upvote 1
  • Haha 2
BillySee58 Grand Master

BillySee58

Posted
Posted (edited)
15 minutes ago, UNTLifer said:

I stated it because we have more young depth than ever before.  Plus, UCLA is a "P5" in LA.  I know you are the recruiting expert, but there are different opinions on this board that are also valid.

Hm, I always seem to get a downvote notification when I get a response from you. Wonder why that is.

I mean, it's promising because Littrell and Harrell have done such a good job with Fine, but there's zero indication that the other guys who have never thrown a division one pass would provide tougher competition than UCLA's QBs. And from the standpoint of a recruit, they aren't committing to UCLA because they're scared off by competition from a bunch of G5 signees who have never thrown a division one pass.

I think we'll sign a good QB this class, and with no other QB commits, plus a junior QB who will be gone after they redshirt, the situation actually should be in our favor for a high school QB.

Edited by BillySee58
  • Upvote 2
  • Thanks 1
  • Downvote 1
UNTLifer Grand Master

UNTLifer

Posted
Posted (edited)

I am also the one that downvoted your post. I thought that was tr purpose is we were in disagreement with the post. Honestly, I don't expect everyone to be in agreement with what I post but you come across as condescending when you don't agree with what someone states. 

I appreciate your input, know that you have some connections in regards to recruiting and you have taken the time to create a rating system based on the caliber of offers a player receives but this is an inexact "science" so there is more than one valid opinion to how and why players decide where to sign. 

By the way, I also upvote your posts I like. I am not one to downvote everything based on a perception of the poster. 

Edited by UNTLifer
  • Upvote 1
  • Confused 1
greenminer Grand Master

greenminer

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, UNTLifer said:

I am also the one that downvoted your post. I thought that was tr purpose is we were in disagreement with the post.

I almost never downvote people based on different opinions.  I usually reserve it for posters who are clearly trolling.

Upvotes/likes/thanks I use very liberally.

  • Upvote 3
  • Thanks 1
UNTLifer Grand Master

UNTLifer

Posted
Posted
8 hours ago, greenminer said:

I almost never downvote people based on different opinions.  I usually reserve it for posters who are clearly trolling.

Upvotes/likes/thanks I use very liberally.

I agree or unless I really disagree with someone. I usually just give positive ratings. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Tell a friend

    Love GoMeanGreen.com? Tell a friend!

  • What's going on Mean Green?

    1. 0

      G5 Top 25 Poll

      1 Oregon 12-0 1325 53 1 - 1/7 2 Texas 11-1 1272 0 3 +1 1/6 3 Penn State 11-1 1192 0 4 +1 3/9 4 Notre Dame 11-1 1165 0 5 +1 4/19 5 Georgia 10-2 1104 0 6 +1 1/10 6 Tennessee 10-2 1025 0 8 +2 4/15 7 SMU 11-1 977 0 9 +2 7/NR 8 Ohio State 10-2 976 0 2 -6 2/8 9 Indiana 11-1 895 0 10 +1 5/NR 10 Boise State 11-1 840 0 11 +1 10/NR 11 Alabama 9-3 733 0 13 +2 2/15 12 South Carolina 9-3 700 0 14 +2 12/NR 13 Arizona State 10-2 665 0 15 +2 13/NR 14 Miami (FL) 10-2 646 0 7 -7 4/19 15 Ole Miss 9-3 638 0 16 +1 5/18 16 Iowa State 10-2 565 0 17 +1 10/NR 17 Clemson 9-3 457 0 12 -5 8/22 18 BYU 10-2 419 0 20 +2 8/NR 19 UNLV 10-2 255 0 21 +2 19/NR 20 Missouri 9-3 229 0 24 +4 8/NR 21 Illinois 9-3 225 0 25 +4 21/NR 22 Colorado 9-3 215 0 NR +5 18/NR 23 Army West Point 10-1 196 0 22 -1 17/NR 24 Memphis 10-2 187 0 23 -1 23/NR 25 Syracuse 9-3 108 0 NR +4 25/NR Schools Dropped Out No. 18 Tulane; No. 19 Texas A&M;
      • 1
      • Confused
      dodgefan in Mean Green Football
    2. 18

      Keeler to Temple

      🙄 like I have stated before DC under a lame duck coach is not a highly desired job for coaches with options.
      Meangreen Fight in Mean Green Football
    3. 18

      Keeler to Temple

      That is very subjective. Boise State or UNLV probably will get the G5 spot in the playoff over a one loss Army team. Louisville, SMU, Houston, Rutgers and Cincinnati left conference for greener pastures. So I don’t know who anointed the AAC as 5th, but the playoff committee isn’t listening to them. Army, a team brand new to the conference that came into the conference and dominated. They were independent juggernauts last year at 6-6 🙄. AAC is viewed as better than the MAC, CUSA and Sun Belt. But we certainly won’t be viewed as better than the reconstructed PAC 12 and right now it doesn’t look like we are viewed better than the current MWC.
      Meangreen Fight in Mean Green Football
    4. 20

      Football at The Dat next wrekend

      Don't if y'all know this or not.....but the last two years we've had Texas high school football games played in Louisiana. Both years the games have been at Turpin Stadium in Natchitoches. As a matter of fact, this year they hosted two games on the same day. (Daingerfield versus Newton, and Texarkana versus Port Neches Grove). Both games were last Friday.
      SUMG in Mean Green Football
    5. 18

      Keeler to Temple

      The exact same thing was probably thought by other fan bases about Eric, Seth, Dan, and any other head coach we’ve hired here.
      • 1
      • Sad
      NTSU52 in Mean Green Football

  • Popular Contributors

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      15,484
    • Most Online
      1,865
    meangreen0015
    Newest Member
    meangreen0015
    Joined

  • Most Points

    1. 1
      El Paso Eagle
      El Paso Eagle
      167,259
    2. 2
      NT80
      NT80
      132,063
    3. 3
      KingDL1
      KingDL1
      128,735
    4. 4
      greenminer
      greenminer
      120,530
    5. 5
      TheReal_jayD
      TheReal_jayD
      105,214

  • Biggest Gamblers

    1. 1
      EdtheEagle
      EdtheEagle
      26,589,731
    2. 2
      UNTLifer
      UNTLifer
      4,156,819
    3. 3
      untphd
      untphd
      781,967
    4. 4
      flyonthewall
      flyonthewall
      670,422
    5. 5
      3_n_out
      3_n_out
      578,480
    6. 6
      SteaminWillieBeamin
    7. 7
      cousin oliver
      cousin oliver
      448,120
    8. 8
      meangreenfaninno
    9. 9
      South Texas Green
    10. 10
      outoftown
      outoftown
      314,541

WE BELIEVE IN THE MEAN GREEN!

News

Recruiting

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Please review our full Privacy Policy before using our site.