Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
12 hours ago, UNTLifer said:

And Denton will upgrade the streets in these areas by late 2030. 

I am so glad they decided that Teasley/2181 needed to be two lanes, 10 years too late.  :boom:

Posted

Denton should rename the planning department to the reactive department.  They are never a head of anything.  I went to advisor meeting for the county on the subject of a new subdivision.  What I perceived from the council meeting is that they will build anything with out thought if the area can handle the extra traffic. Why ,"that has always been the way in Denton".  That philosophy has worked out so well. Traffic is big problem here for a small city.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Please review our full Privacy Policy before using our site.