Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
5 minutes ago, greeneagle1 said:

No more 11-0 season with the prospect of going 12-0 with a conference championship and a G5 NY6 invite? 

At least they aspire for greatness.

  • Upvote 2
  • Confused 1
  • Downvote 2
Posted
15 minutes ago, laxtonto said:

Funny to laugh at their fans, and as good as it is for the us fir recruiting, it sucks fir the conference perception that a CUSA team gets left on the sidelines with 2MAC schools.

 

More time for them to recruit, which they excel at.. 

  • Upvote 1
  • Lovely Take 1
  • Downvote 4
Posted

Serious question here ... I thought there was an NCAA rule that stated all teams with winning records HAD to be invited first to bowls ... THEN it fell to teams that went 6-6 ... and then if there were no more teams at 6-6 ... THEN it went to 5-7 teams like us last year.  Is this not a thing anymore?  Cuz as much as I don't like UTSA they did deserve to go more than say 6-6 MUTS.    In a related note, how did the Armed Forces Bowl avoid taking a CUSA team and nab a Mountain West team instead?  I guess contractual obligations don't mean that much?

Posted
2 minutes ago, TreeFiddy said:

Happy for Joe.  Been afraid we were going to get a post from his wife soon if your blood pressure didn't go down some.

Ha! That's funny. She has been keeping a close watch on me all day. But, happy to say, as old as I am, I am in solid health and take no medication. Sorry to disappoint some on this board.

Posted

It is okay with me that UTSA is staying home and I am even happier to see New Mexico State going to the Arizona Bowl.   We had some great games with them during our Sun Belt years .  They are leaving the Sun Belt and going Independent.   That is a tough road to go but I wish them well.

  • Upvote 1
  • Lovely Take 1
Posted (edited)

Apparently when UTSA officials asked why they did not receive an invitation they were told it was not personal.

They simply responded "no offense".

Edited by MCMLXXX
  • Haha 4
Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, vpackrats said:

Serious question here ... I thought there was an NCAA rule that stated all teams with winning records HAD to be invited first to bowls ... THEN it fell to teams that went 6-6 ... and then if there were no more teams at 6-6 ... THEN it went to 5-7 teams like us last year.  Is this not a thing anymore?  Cuz as much as I don't like UTSA they did deserve to go more than say 6-6 MUTS.    In a related note, how did the Armed Forces Bowl avoid taking a CUSA team and nab a Mountain West team instead?  I guess contractual obligations don't mean that much?

in the conference's official example, it uses 7 wins, in parenthesis, as the qualifier for a winning record

 

cusa traded with camelia and did some other junk to get 9 teams in bowls instead of 8...

Edited by THOR
  • Thanks 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Please review our full Privacy Policy before using our site.