Jump to content

G5 Rankings Week 6

UNT86

By UNT86
in Mean Green Football

 Share

Recommended Posts

UNT86 Mentor

UNT86

Posted
Posted

1.       South Florida

2.       Navy

3.       San Diego State

4.       Central Florida

5.       Houston

6.       Toledo

7.       UTSA

8.       Troy

9.       SMU

10.   Memphis

11.   Western Michigan

12.   Ohio

13.   Army

14.   Appalachian State

15.   Eastern Michigan

16.   Boise State

17.   New Mexico

18.   Old Dominion

19.   Wyoming

20.   Tulane

21.   Marshall

22.   Western Kentucky

23.   Northern Illinois

24.   Miami

25.   Louisiana Tech

26.   Southern Miss

27.   Idaho

28.   Air Force

29.   Florida International

30.   Arkansas State

31.   Fresno State

32.   UNLV

33.   Utah State

34.   Tulsa

35.   North Texas

36.   Buffalo

37.   Temple

38.   Georgia State

39.   Louisiana-Monroe

40.   Florida Atlantic

southsideguy Grand Master

southsideguy

Posted
Posted (edited)

UTSA is a head of SMU?  i  know i used two negatives in the same sentence.  UNLV is ahead of us?  who made this list or did someone just make it up.

Edited by southsideguy
  • Upvote 3
dmaxel Apprentice

dmaxel

Posted
Posted
31 minutes ago, Salsa_Verde said:

This list makes no sense. Isn't Idaho an FCS school? 

No they're currently in the Sun Belt, but getting kicked out after this season. Last I checked, they can still choose between remaining an FBS Independent or going back to FCS.

Mean Green 93-98 Grand Master

Mean Green 93-98

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, dmaxel said:

No they're currently in the Sun Belt, but getting kicked out after this season. Last I checked, they can still choose between remaining an FBS Independent or going back to FCS.

When was Idaho ever FCS?  They're an erstwhile PAC team.

  • Downvote 1
dmaxel Apprentice

dmaxel

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, Mean Green 93-98 said:

When was Idaho ever FCS?  They're an erstwhile PAC team.

Long ago, but not at recent as I thought. They were in the WAC which wasn't FCS, and they were Independent when we played them in 2013 (legit thought they were FCS back then). But another correction: seems like they've decided to drop to FCS. Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Idaho_Vandals

Mean Green 93-98 Grand Master

Mean Green 93-98

Posted
Posted (edited)
7 minutes ago, dmaxel said:

Long ago, but not at recent as I thought. They were in the WAC which wasn't FCS, and they were Independent when we played them in 2013 (legit thought they were FCS back then). But another correction: seems like they've decided to drop to FCS. Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Idaho_Vandals

I knew they were going to the Big Sky since the Belt was dropping them, but didn't think they had ever been FCS/1AA before.  I guess they came back up to the Big West the year after us--I don't quite recall that.

Edited by Mean Green 93-98
GMG24 Proficient

GMG24

Posted
Posted
38 minutes ago, THOR said:

who cares...win games...worry about ourselves

MY MAN!!! 

  • Upvote 2
  • Downvote 3
kj86 Community Regular

kj86

Posted
Posted

This one seems more reasonable.  It's based on the Massey Composite.

1 UCF
2 San Diego State
3 South Florida
4 Navy
5 Houston 
6 SMU
7 Memphis
8 Toledo
9 W. Michigan
10 Colorado St.
11 Boise St.
12 Troy
13 UTSA
14 Marshall
15 Northern Illinois
16 App St.
17 Tulane
18 Ohio 
19 New Mexico
20 Utah St.
21 Louisiana Tech
22 Army
23 Wyoming
24 Fresno St.
25 North Texas
26 Cincinnati
27 Buffalo
28 Air Force
29 Tulsa
30 Temple
31 WKU
32 Miami (OH)
33 FAU
34 UNLV
35 E. Michigan
36 Southern Miss
37 FIU
38 Arkansas St.
39 NM State
40 Old Dominion
  • Upvote 4
golfingomez Veteran

golfingomez

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, kj86 said:

This one seems more reasonable.  It's based on the Massey Composite.

1 UCF
2 San Diego State
3 South Florida
4 Navy
5 Houston 
6 SMU
7 Memphis
8 Toledo
9 W. Michigan
10 Colorado St.
11 Boise St.
12 Troy
13 UTSA
14 Marshall
15 Northern Illinois
16 App St.
17 Tulane
18 Ohio 
19 New Mexico
20 Utah St.
21 Louisiana Tech
22 Army
23 Wyoming
24 Fresno St.
25 North Texas
26 Cincinnati
27 Buffalo
28 Air Force
29 Tulsa
30 Temple
31 WKU
32 Miami (OH)
33 FAU
34 UNLV
35 E. Michigan
36 Southern Miss
37 FIU
38 Arkansas St.
39 NM State
40 Old Dominion

This one has us higher... definitely seems more legit...

  • Haha 1
Moobs Experienced

Moobs

Posted
Posted

http://www.espn.com/college-football/statistics/teamratings

ESPN FPI rankings have us and our remaining opponents ranked like this:

71. Army

73. nUTSAck

88. FAU

89. La Tech

92. UNT

109. Old Dominion

126. Rice

129. UTEP

 

I agree with the above posts that we just need to win games and worry about ourselves.  But if I were to worry about anyone else's rankings, it would only be the teams left on the schedule.  And these can be marked off the list 1 week at a time.

 

Win the games we should win and we get to go bowling again.  Win a couple more and we could be hosting a championship game.  I'm really excited for the remainder of the year.

  • Upvote 1
MeanGreenTexan Grand Master

MeanGreenTexan

Posted
Posted
11 minutes ago, Moobs said:

http://www.espn.com/college-football/statistics/teamratings

ESPN FPI rankings have us and our remaining opponents ranked like this:

71. Army

73. nUTSAck

88. FAU

89. La Tech

92. UNT

109. Old Dominion

126. Rice

129. UTEP

 

I agree with the above posts that we just need to win games and worry about ourselves.  But if I were to worry about anyone else's rankings, it would only be the teams left on the schedule.  And these can be marked off the list 1 week at a time.

 

Win the games we should win and we get to go bowling again.  Win a couple more and we could be hosting a championship game.  I'm really excited for the remainder of the year.

I don't think Army is that good, and I don't think ODU or LATech are that bad.   I'm still not sure about UNT.   UTSA is about where they should be having only played 3 games, with one of those being a Baylor win.

I originally predicted an undisciplined FAU team to lose to UNT.   They just beat MT (granted, MT was without Stockstill).  I'm now worried about the FAU game.

UNTFan23 Community Regular

UNTFan23

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, MeanGreenTexan said:

I don't think Army is that good, and I don't think ODU or LATech are that bad.   I'm still not sure about UNT.   UTSA is about where they should be having only played 3 games, with one of those being a Baylor win.

I originally predicted an undisciplined FAU team to lose to UNT.   They just beat MT (granted, MT was without Stockstill).  I'm now worried about the FAU game.

ODU is 2-2. Their two wins are UMASS and Albany (FCS school?). Their offense seems pretty weak. They've lost to North Carolina and Virginia Tech ... and they lost to them bad. It'll be interesting to see how they handle FAU.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Tell a friend

    Love GoMeanGreen.com? Tell a friend!

  • What's going on Mean Green?

    1. 1

      Around the AAC (11/19/2024)

      pretty comfy, 3-0 night
      Censored by Laurie in Mean Green Basketball
    2. 1

      Depth Chart vs ECU

      I think what Odom was running at USC was a 3-3-5 that had a “RUSH” position serving as a hybrid DE/LB, so really only 2 second level linebackers, making it similar to a 4-2-5 in effect. Different from Caponi’s 3-3-5 stack. Maybe someone like Chavez Brown could play that type of role but not exactly a lot of time to implement that level of scheme change. https://usctrojans.com/sports/2022/8/31/2022-usc-trojans-football-roster-depth-chart
      BillySee58 in Mean Green Football
    3. 430

      ***OFFICIAL UNT vs. UTSA IN-GAME DISCUSSION***

      Offense lacks a vertical passing game. People have raved about the top 5 offense in passing yards per game but per the NCAA website and ESPN (NCAA is more precise with some of the numbers), CM is 48th in yards per completion at 12.37 YPC, 41st in yards per attempt at 7.85 YPA, 45th in completion percentage at 63.7%, and tied for second in pass attempts at 422. The numbers show we don't push the ball downfield as much as others and that we aren't efficient enough considering how little we do that. Being top 5 in passing yards is simply a volume stat at this point. We just throw a ton. Screens are great but when it's most of what you do, it gets dicey. Those and run plays start off as negative yardage plays dependent on blocking. Can't have those every drive. About teams figuring out EM, our competition has gotten better.
      GMG_Dallas in Mean Green Football
    4. 136

      McNeese State (11/18/24)

      Simmons also spoiled us with his guaranteed scoring night after night.
      Green Otaku in Mean Green Basketball
    5. 1

      Depth Chart vs ECU

      Doesn’t appear so, but any chance we run the 4-2-5? Craven sounded very confident on the ROF podcast today.
      Glory to the Green in Mean Green Football

  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      3_n_out
      3_n_out
      178
    2. 2
      NT80
      NT80
      138
    3. 3
      GMG_Dallas
    4. 4
      SUMG
      SUMG
      134
    5. 5
      UNTLifer
      UNTLifer
      106
    Show More

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      15,480
    • Most Online
      1,865
    meangreen0015
    Newest Member
    meangreen0015
    Joined

WE BELIEVE IN THE MEAN GREEN!

News

Recruiting

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Please review our full Privacy Policy before using our site.