Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
14 minutes ago, meanrob said:

You're right, this will probably be a four win team. And you want to know why?

Because when RV was a total dipshit AD (and it was obvious back in about 2004) you still supported him and he was kept to hire a dipshit like Mac who ran this program into the ground. Only when it was CLEARLY obvious ten years too late did you finally raise a peep about RV. So look in the mirror pal. Because it's guys like you who kept saying RV was doing a great job that allowed him to stick around and royally screw up this program. You and your ilk were the original 17. 

Holy hell this is good where's the popcorn 

  • Lovely Take 1
  • Haha 1
  • Downvote 2
Posted
Just now, Mean_Green09 said:

Hey old man you need to take your shit somewhere else. The great people of GMG.com don't need you to tell them their team is sucky. Go suck on some TCU titty over at Killer Frogs.com

 

IMG_0574.JPG

  • Upvote 2
  • Lovely Take 1
  • Downvote 1
Posted (edited)
16 minutes ago, meanrob said:

You're right, this will probably be a four win team. And you want to know why?

Because when RV was a total dipshit AD (and it was obvious back in about 2004) you still supported him and he was kept to hire a dipshit like Mac who ran this program into the ground. Only when it was CLEARLY obvious ten years too late did you finally raise a peep about RV. So look in the mirror pal. Because it's guys like you who kept saying RV was doing a great job that allowed him to stick around and royally screw up this program. You and your ilk were the original 17. 

LOL. I wasn't even connect to this crap in 2004. You must have me confused with someone else, pal.

And at least I did something. What the F did you do?

Edited by UNT90
  • Upvote 2
  • Lovely Take 1
  • Thanks 1
  • Downvote 4
Posted
2 minutes ago, untjim1995 said:

Dickey needed to go when he did. Losing was back in a big way, he had the charm of a porcupine, and his offense was a good way to cure insomnia. He provided nothing close to what we needed for the program to move upward from where we had gotten in the years before. Whether that was because of RV or because they couldn't work well together, it's all he said/she said. 

But RV having the insulation of the UNT BOR, then the UNT 17, was the pathetic part of all of this. And it's why we are where we are. Littrell has to get better, but he is our coach now because we didn't have a ton of choices that were any better or more well known.

I never made my opinion of RV because of what happened to Dickey. Take Dickey out of the equation and RV still was a horrible AD. 

Posted
4 minutes ago, Mean_Green09 said:

Hey old man you need to take your shit somewhere else. The great people of GMG.com don't need you to tell them their team is sucky. Go suck on some TCU titty over at Killer Frogs.com

Hey, child, this is football, and since I give at a much larger level than you, I'll say wht I want. Maybe you should wake the F up and demand some accountability 

  • Upvote 4
  • Downvote 3
Posted
6 minutes ago, Got5onIt said:

SMU adjusted after giving up 10 quick points. NT didn't score again until late in the 3rd on the deep pass. Inexcusable, imo. Horrible offensive series after horrible offensive series all the way into 4th. SMU's Defensive staff schooled NTs offensive staff. 

I said it earlier, NT did not get out athleted tonight. Sutton yeah, but no way in hell was SMU better across the board. 

The special teams did no help for the defense with muffed punts in back to back weeks and putting the offense in shitty position as well.. 

wasnt entirely in the offense, but the 2nd quarter and early 3rd was terrible. 

I will give Mason credit and we all should, at least his deep ball is A LOT better now.. 

Posted
Just now, UNT90 said:

Hey, child, this is football, and since I give at a much larger level than you, I'll say wht I want. Maybe you should wake the F up and demand some accountability 

No this is a fan board. This isn't football. 

I don't care what you give. You're just another old white man who I can blame for ruining this country. 

  • Confused 1
  • Downvote 13
Posted
2 minutes ago, BTG_Fan1 said:

The special teams did no help for the defense with muffed punts in back to back weeks and putting the offense in shitty position as well.. 

wasnt entirely in the offense, but the 2nd quarter and early 3rd was terrible. 

I will give Mason credit and we all should, at least his deep ball is A LOT better now.. 

...against 2nd and 3rd teamers.

  • Upvote 2
Posted
14 minutes ago, Cerebus said:

 

There were only a few people who knew what the RV/Dickey drama was back then, and most of them them knew the wrong person got run off.

90 wasn't around during the Dickey era.  He only joined this board in '08.

And I don't remember if he staunchly supported RV or not at first.   Everyone had their different breaking points, me included.  But I do know once he learned the sham he called it like it was and did what he felt was right by publicly calling for a change and had the nads to put his name on it.

Rick

  • Upvote 3
  • Downvote 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, BTG_Fan1 said:

The special teams did no help for the defense with muffed punts in back to back weeks and putting the offense in shitty position as well.. 

wasnt entirely in the offense, but the 2nd quarter and early 3rd was terrible. 

I will give Mason credit and we all should, at least his deep ball is A LOT better now.. 

I don't blame Mason at all. The rollouts and quick screens weren't his call. Constant desinged dink & dunks while SMUs safeties played close, shit calls. Wonder why Wilson only rushed for 45yds?? SMU had zero respect for the intermediate passing game. The horrible wildcat crap deep in their own territory, shit play call. The overy long developing play in their own end zone in the 1st half, shit call. 

  • Upvote 1
Posted
Just now, Mean_Green09 said:

No this is a fan board. This isn't football. 

I don't care what you give. You're just another old white man who I can blame for ruining this country. 

If you're blaming people because of their skin color because they are on a fan board or running the country, then I think you are likely missing the real problem of what is going on.

1 minute ago, OfficerBennett said:

That is a really expensive piece whose daddy shelled out $40k a year for her elementary education degree.  Go figure.

I guess I gotta reword my question, but does she have an name and if so, what is it lol 

  • Upvote 2
Posted
3 minutes ago, Got5onIt said:

I don't blame Mason at all. The rollouts and quick screens weren't his call. Constant desinged dink & dunks while SMUs safeties played close, shit calls. Wonder why Wilson only rushed for 45yds?? SMU had zero respect for the intermediate passing game. The horrible wildcat crap deep in their own territory, shit play call. The overy long developing play in their own end zone in the 1st half, shit call. 

Agreed Fine shouldn't be blamed, he played well but GH called a terrible game at times

Just now, OfficerBennett said:

Anyone wonder yet why Littrell and Perry "agreed to part ways" over the summer?

Likely bc Perry had been here for years and hadn't made any progress.. in G5 you don't wanna remain in the same spot to long

  • Upvote 1
Posted

 

5 minutes ago, OfficerBennett said:

That is a really expensive piece whose daddy shelled out $40k a year for her elementary education degree.  Go figure.

 

IMG_0575.GIF

  • Upvote 1
  • Lovely Take 1
  • Haha 2
Posted
5 minutes ago, shootermcgavin44 said:

Wren can't make tough decisions. Hank and many of the hold overs from the AD are still here. He let Benford keep coaching about 4 months too long and extended a lame duck softball coach for no reason. Same ole same ole small time UNT athletics 

11 people out of 10 can't even name the softball coach anyway...but, the rest of your post is spot on.

16 minutes ago, Silent Eagle said:

 

 

IMG_0575.GIF

Yeah...gotta love those coeds whose dads have already bought them boobs.  

Chump change.  Just make future hubbie remembers to pay for maintenance on 'em every decade or so you don't look like an washed up porn star in your 30s and 40s.

  • Lovely Take 1
Posted
11 minutes ago, OfficerBennett said:

11 people out of 10 can't even name the softball coach anyway...but, the rest of your post is spot on.

Yeah...gotta love those coeds whose dads have already bought them boobs.  

Chump change.  Just make future hubbie remembers to pay for maintenance on 'em every decade or so you don't look like an washed up porn star in your 30s and 40s.

I doubt you have a reason to be so cynical 

  • Downvote 1
Posted
24 minutes ago, shootermcgavin44 said:

Wren can't make tough decisions. Hank and many of the hold overs from the AD are still here. He let Benford keep coaching about 4 months too long and extended a lame duck softball coach for no reason. Same ole same ole small time UNT athletics 

Dear lord WB either didn't trust the assistant coaches under TB nor could he have brought in his guy at the time.. firing a HC, WB pointed out doesn't help either.. 

No idea about the softball coach as I have no real experience with that sport.. 

The Hank thing is likely he because he is 1- Producing in his new spot and has connections with the right people that are larger donors that keep giving because of Hank.. 2- He has some type of contract that isn't easy to get out but again none of us have any idea how their contracts are set up.. Coming in and just firing everyone is nice for some people on here because they hated RV and everything he touched, but coming in and cleaning house isn't how most businesses run. 

Also, are you trying to say WB is to scared to fire SL??? Anyone considering the removal of SL has no idea what they are talking about

 

  • Downvote 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, BTG_Fan1 said:

Dear lord WB either didn't trust the assistant coaches under TB nor could he have brought in his guy at the time.. firing a HC, WB pointed out doesn't help either.. 

No idea about the softball coach as I have no real experience with that sport.. 

The Hank thing is likely he because he is 1- Producing in his new spot and has connections with the right people that are larger donors that keep giving because of Hank.. 2- He has some type of contract that isn't easy to get out but again none of us have any idea how their contracts are set up.. Coming in and just firing everyone is nice for some people on here because they hated RV and everything he touched, but coming in and cleaning house isn't how most businesses run. 

Also, are you trying to say WB is to scared to fire SL??? Anyone considering the removal of SL has no idea what they are talking about

 

The Hank thing is because Wren was told he couldn't fire him. Plain and simple.

Same old UNT.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Please review our full Privacy Policy before using our site.