Jump to content

Recruiting Negative Thoughts

GrandGreen

By GrandGreen
in UNT Football Recruiting

 Share

Recommended Posts

GrandGreen Grand Master

GrandGreen

Posted
Posted (edited)

I will put this in a separate thread, not to offend those that believe linking a comment about recruiting shortfalls with a recruits' name is mentioned.  It is also labeled so those that are tired of recruiting criticism can stay away.  

Current Status

Here is where NT currently stands in CUSA.   Based on average recruiter ratings, NT is ahead of two schools: UAB and ODU.  NT has one 3 star recruit.   The CUSA leaders currently are La Tech with 7, Rice 5 and UTSA 4.  NT is going to have another small class due to the number of blue shirts counting for this year's recruiting.   I do not see any commit to NT that had another FB division offer.   Leblanc committed early and to be fair will get other offers. 

Do Rankings matter

This will be a topic as long as coaches and AD's of poor recruiting teams continue to downplay the rankings.

Everyone should know that recruiting services miss all the time, but still overall the probability of success can be easily demonstrated based on these rankings. 

Look at NT.  NT in all their fb division experience has had three brief eras of football success.  Due to NT's very early acceptance of Afro-American athletes, the sixties' teams were outstanding as the SWC and other regional conferences were very slow at admitting Afro-American athletes.   Fry could and did recruit well against other Texas schools, so his mid-seventies teams were outstanding in NT history.   The other era, was DD's run in the early Belt which was build on one fine outstanding recruiting class.  

Other then those years, McCarney had one good year by a very experienced team with a few relatively high rated players leading the way. 

Does NT have inherent recruiting disadvantages

A lot of fans are buying into this argument that NT, because of a losing history, culture or some other intangible rationale, is just not a place that players with other options want to play for.

Losing no doubt hurts recruiting, however recruits have short memories and that can be turned around quickly.  Too many losing programs have quickly turned it around with the right hire and increased resources.  

No one should expect NT to win recruiting battles with most P5's, not going to happen.  However, I see no reason for example; that NT should not be more than competitive with regional CUSA teams.    Neither Rice, UTEP, USM, UTSA or La Tech have overall competition recruiting advantages over NT.   Sure each university has advantages and disadvantages, but NT should not be consistently losing recruiting battles to these schools. 

Can NT turn it around with sub-par recruiting

I think it is possible, although NT history would say no.    We saw Littrell win five last year, and it is certainly very possible that NT can win more as Littrell's program is built.  Coaching and scheme can offset talent shortfalls, but whether it can be done consistently is questionable.  

 

Edited by GrandGreen
  • Upvote 5
  • Downvote 1
  • Replies 86
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

GrandGreen
GrandGreen

Yes, there is no way that NT should be expected to compete with the mighty bulldogs.  

GrandGreen
GrandGreen

I will put this in a separate thread, not to offend those that believe linking a comment about recruiting shortfalls with a recruits' name is mentioned.  It is also labeled so those that are tired of

BTG_Fan1
BTG_Fan1

LAT is one of the better G5

AustinFromUNT Newbie

AustinFromUNT

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, GrandGreen said:

I will put this in a separate thread, not to offend those that believe linking a comment about recruiting shortfalls with a recruits' name is mentioned.  It is also labeled so those that are tired of recruiting criticism can stay away.  

Current Status

Here is where NT currently stands in CUSA.   Based on average recruiter ratings, NT is ahead of two schools: UAB and ODU.  NT has one 3 star recruit.   The CUSA leaders currently are La Tech with 7, Rice 5 and UTSA 4.  NT is going to have another small class due to the number of blue shirts counting for this year's recruiting.   I do not see any commit to NT that had another FB division offer.   Leblanc committed early and to be fair will get other offers. 

Do Rankings MatterI

Also, Kason hasn't been rated yet. When a player is rated NA the default for the average is .7000. I think he will be rated higher than that personally. Which, will then raise our average recruit ranking. I think we could definitely improve recruiting though. I think that if this class underwhelms, and we have some more coaches picked off, SL would (should) bring in some known recruiter who actually want to work here. Again, this depends on us having a good season on the field.

  • Upvote 1
MeanGreenMailbox aka TFLF Newbie

MeanGreenMailbox aka TFLF

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, GrandGreen said:

I will put this in a separate thread, not to offend those that believe linking a comment about recruiting shortfalls with a recruits' name is mentioned.  It is also labeled so those that are tired of recruiting criticism can stay away.  

Current Status

Here is where NT currently stands in CUSA.   Based on average recruiter ratings, NT is ahead of two schools: UAB and ODU.  NT has one 3 star recruit.   The CUSA leaders currently are La Tech with 7, Rice 5 and UTSA 4.  NT is going to have another small class due to the number of blue shirts counting for this year's recruiting.   I do not see any commit to NT that had another FB division offer.   Leblanc committed early and to be fair will get other offers. 

Do Rankings matter

This will be a topic as long as coaches and AD's of poor recruiting teams continue to downplay the rankings.

Everyone should know that recruiting services miss all the time, but still overall the probability of success can be easily demonstrated based on these rankings. 

Look at NT.  NT in all their fb division experience has had three brief eras of football success.  Due to NT's very early acceptance of Afro-American athletes, the sixties' teams were outstanding as the SWC and other regional conferences were very slow at admitting Afro-American athletes.   Fry could and did recruit well against other Texas schools, so his mid-seventies teams were outstanding in NT history.   The other era, was DD's run in the early Belt which was build on one fine outstanding recruiting class.  

Other then those years, McCarney had one good year by a very experienced team with a few relatively high rated players leading the way. 

Does NT have inherent recruiting disadvantages

A lot of fans are buying into this argument that NT, because of a losing history, culture or some other intangible rationale, is just not a place that players with other options want to play for.

Losing no doubt hurts recruiting, however recruits have short memories and that can be turned around quickly.  Too many losing programs have quickly turned it around with the right hire and increased resources.  

No one should expect NT to win recruiting battles with most P5's, not going to happen.  However, I see no reason for example; that NT should not be more than competitive with regional CUSA teams.    Neither Rice, UTEP, USM, UTSA or La Tech have overall competition recruiting advantages over NT.   Sure each university has advantages and disadvantages, but NT should not be consistently losing recruiting battles to these schools. 

Can NT turn it around with sub-par recruiting

I think it is possible, although NT history would say no.    We saw Littrell win five last year, and it is certainly very possible that NT can win more as Littrell's program is built.  Coaching and scheme can offset talent shortfalls, but whether it can be done consistently is questionable.  

 

Since 1995 call up to big league we're four winning seasons and 22 losing seasons.  So...

...coaching and scheming seems to be more about wishing and dreaming.  There is nothing different about our spread than the other 100 schools running some form of spread.  It's 2017, not 1997; so no defensive coordinator is surprised to see it anymore.  

Throw into the mix that the offensive coordinator and WR coach hired weren't very experienced in the first place, and we're that much more not really starting off at the same level as everyone.  

But, we are paying more in salaries now for the whole ball of wax; so, we've got that going for us.  Which is nice.

  • Upvote 2
  • Downvote 1
GMG24 Proficient

GMG24

Posted
Posted
8 hours ago, GrandGreen said:

I will put this in a separate thread, not to offend those that believe linking a comment about recruiting shortfalls with a recruits' name is mentioned.  It is also labeled so those that are tired of recruiting criticism can stay away.  

Current Status

Here is where NT currently stands in CUSA.   Based on average recruiter ratings, NT is ahead of two schools: UAB and ODU.  NT has one 3 star recruit.   The CUSA leaders currently are La Tech with 7, Rice 5 and UTSA 4.  NT is going to have another small class due to the number of blue shirts counting for this year's recruiting.   I do not see any commit to NT that had another FB division offer.   Leblanc committed early and to be fair will get other offers. 

Do Rankings matter

This will be a topic as long as coaches and AD's of poor recruiting teams continue to downplay the rankings.

Everyone should know that recruiting services miss all the time, but still overall the probability of success can be easily demonstrated based on these rankings. 

Look at NT.  NT in all their fb division experience has had three brief eras of football success.  Due to NT's very early acceptance of Afro-American athletes, the sixties' teams were outstanding as the SWC and other regional conferences were very slow at admitting Afro-American athletes.   Fry could and did recruit well against other Texas schools, so his mid-seventies teams were outstanding in NT history.   The other era, was DD's run in the early Belt which was build on one fine outstanding recruiting class.  

Other then those years, McCarney had one good year by a very experienced team with a few relatively high rated players leading the way. 

Does NT have inherent recruiting disadvantages

A lot of fans are buying into this argument that NT, because of a losing history, culture or some other intangible rationale, is just not a place that players with other options want to play for.

Losing no doubt hurts recruiting, however recruits have short memories and that can be turned around quickly.  Too many losing programs have quickly turned it around with the right hire and increased resources.  

No one should expect NT to win recruiting battles with most P5's, not going to happen.  However, I see no reason for example; that NT should not be more than competitive with regional CUSA teams.    Neither Rice, UTEP, USM, UTSA or La Tech have overall competition recruiting advantages over NT.   Sure each university has advantages and disadvantages, but NT should not be consistently losing recruiting battles to these schools. 

Can NT turn it around with sub-par recruiting

I think it is possible, although NT history would say no.    We saw Littrell win five last year, and it is certainly very possible that NT can win more as Littrell's program is built.  Coaching and scheme can offset talent shortfalls, but whether it can be done consistently is questionable.  

 

Being around HS kids and players from other schools, whether anyone wants to acknowledge it or not, UNT's history of losing has many of them having us as a second choice.  Kids know what they've seen recently.  Who have been the big G5 winners?  Houston is top of the board, thus the reason you'll see us consistently losing battles to them (IMO it'll keep happening until we are winning 8-10 games a year).  

  • Upvote 4
GrandGreen Grand Master

GrandGreen

Posted
  • Author
Posted
38 minutes ago, GMG24 said:

Being around HS kids and players from other schools, whether anyone wants to acknowledge it or not, UNT's history of losing has many of them having us as a second choice.  Kids know what they've seen recently.  Who have been the big G5 winners?  Houston is top of the board, thus the reason you'll see us consistently losing battles to them (IMO it'll keep happening until we are winning 8-10 games a year).  

Losing recruits to Houston at this point is to be expected, they are at the top of the G5's.   Losing recruits to La Tech, UTSA, Rice and the like should not be.  

  • Upvote 3
GMG24 Proficient

GMG24

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, GrandGreen said:

Losing recruits to Houston at this point is to be expected, they are at the top of the G5's.   Losing recruits to La Tech, UTSA, Rice and the like should not be.  

La Tech has a lot to sell.  I agree on Rice/UTSA however with Rice recently upgraded facilities apparently they're very cool.  

 

*Im not saying I think facilities are end all be all, but they sure help.  We need the IPF done and we need wins and things should change quickly. 

  • Upvote 3
  • Downvote 1
BTG_Fan1 Newbie

BTG_Fan1

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, GrandGreen said:

Losing recruits to Houston at this point is to be expected, they are at the top of the G5's.   Losing recruits to La Tech, UTSA, Rice and the like should not be.  

LAT is one of the better G5

  • Upvote 4
  • Downvote 1
GrandGreen Grand Master

GrandGreen

Posted
  • Author
Posted
10 minutes ago, BTG_Fan1 said:

LAT is one of the better G5

 

1 hour ago, GMG24 said:

La Tech has a lot to sell.  I agree on Rice/UTSA however with Rice recently upgraded facilities apparently they're very cool.  

 

*Im not saying I think facilities are end all be all, but they sure help.  We need the IPF done and we need wins and things should change quickly. 

Yes, there is no way that NT should be expected to compete with the mighty bulldogs.  

  • Upvote 4
  • Downvote 3
UNTLifer Grand Master

UNTLifer

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, GrandGreen said:

 

Yes, there is no way that NT should be expected to compete with the mighty bulldogs.  

How many QB's has La Tech sent to the NFL compared to us?  Receivers?  Etc...?

  • Upvote 1
  • Downvote 2
Cr1028 Grand Master

Cr1028

Posted
Posted
13 hours ago, GMG24 said:

La Tech has a lot to sell.  I agree on Rice/UTSA however with Rice recently upgraded facilities apparently they're very cool.  

 

*Im not saying I think facilities are end all be all, but they sure help.  We need the IPF done and we need wins and things should change quickly. 

Don't forget they also get a degree with Rice printed on it. That certainly helps for the players that can get in.

8 hours ago, techdawg88 said:

recruits care

f7FdEdG.jpg

  • Upvote 3
Aldo Rookie

Aldo

Posted
Posted
12 hours ago, GrandGreen said:

Yes, there is no way that NT should be expected to compete with the mighty bulldogs.  

You're right. We should expect to compete with any G5, because G5. But it's certainly not the case until we actually do. 

And it sucks. Hard.

  • Upvote 2
Cr1028 Grand Master

Cr1028

Posted
Posted (edited)

Here's another question. Are we sabotaging ourselves to some degree? Obviously some recruits parents and recruits themselves have been to this board because they registered and posted. Are we shooting ourselves in the foot by ragging on this recruiting class before it has signed?  17 year old football stars have a tendency to have a high degree of self-worth. When we say things like, "I don't like this recruit because he doesn't have any FBS offer but ours" or "this recruit isn't any good because no other coach thought he was good enough to be offered", don't you think as soon as a comparable or"better" offer comes along that recruit will jump to the new scholarship because the UNT fan base never really wanted me anyway? Remember we are not talking about life-experienced middle aged men here. We are talking about 17 year olds who have been told they are the greatest their entire life.

Just a question. What say you? Is this even plausible? Is this the old, "when you expect to fail, you will be correct every time" type of deal?

Edited by Cr1028
  • Upvote 2
Ben Gooding Newbie

Ben Gooding

Posted
Posted

Sure we are. But I don't think it will hurt or change anything. The last 16 or 17 commits/signees never did or haven't yet end up with another FBS offer. 

We always talk chicken/egg analogy when we talk about recruiting - winning. Some think we have to recruit better to win while others think we have to win to recruit better. Neither option is wrong as both would improve the program. But recruiting better to win is more efficient and a quicker solution as opposed to winning to recruit better. At UNT, the writing is on the wall of that we're gong to have to win to recruit better. Though this is not an excuse of the poor recruiting as we should still be able to snag guys here and there. And that is where the criticism lies, we're not really even able to do that. The amount of blueshirts and 0 offer guys is unprecedented and starting to be worse than McCarney recruiting. And that's the frustrating part, I don't see us being able to win to improve recruiting with what we have been hauling. And when/if that happens, then what?  

  • Upvote 1
Cr1028 Grand Master

Cr1028

Posted
Posted

But @Ben Gooding, aren't we still 9 months from signing day? If the kids follow my scenario and leave at the first offer that isn't ours because they feel we've "thrown shade" their way, won't we be stuck scrambling for more zero offer guys, thus perpetuating what we were trying to avoid?

  • Upvote 1
UNTLifer Grand Master

UNTLifer

Posted
Posted
35 minutes ago, Ben Gooding said:

Sure we are. But I don't think it will hurt or change anything. The last 16 or 17 commits/signees never did or haven't yet end up with another FBS offer. 

  

Again, not an accurate statement.

  • Upvote 1
  • Downvote 1
GrandGreen Grand Master

GrandGreen

Posted
  • Author
Posted
9 hours ago, techdawg88 said:

recruits care

 

8 hours ago, BTG_Fan1 said:

A lot of people here don't seem to understand that for some reason. 

Most NT fans including me are very beware and in fact envious of the success of La Tech in athletics.   However, La Tech is not a team that should be dominating NT in recruiting.  There is a lot of difference between the resource level of Houston and any CUSA team.  With their recent success and the resources, UH has got the upper hand on just about any G5 program.  

Despite the apparent belief of some fans, La Tech should not have any great advantage over NT in recruiting.   Yes, they have won a lot more and send more players to the pros, a statement almost any university can make when comparing themselves to NT.  

Frankly, if NT can't challenge a program like La Tech which NT has some significant advantages over, than it may be time to just abandon sports at NT.  A ridiculous statement maybe, but no more so than believing that just about any school in the nation has inherent recruiting advantages over NT.  

  • Upvote 2
UNTLifer Grand Master

UNTLifer

Posted
Posted (edited)
9 hours ago, techdawg88 said:

recruits care

They also care about  your history of winning and losing.  We are on the right track, but it will take a little time.  Win, build the IPF, win, build the soccer/track venue, win, continue to upgrade the existing facilities and win and they will come around.

I agree that we should be able to compete with La Tech and UNT does hold a number of advantages over them, but these are 17-18 year old kids choosing a school with the input of parents, that many think this is the stepping stone for their child to go to the NFL, who don't always look at the entire picture.

My message to recruits is be the one to take the challenge of turning this program around and putting it where it deserves to be alongside Houston as a top tier G5.  Many of you don't like Littrell's recruiting because he is a straight shooter, but I believe he is building this program the right way which will take time.  Going from 1-11 to 5-8 in year one looks good to me and I expect us to improve on 5-8 this year.

Edited by UNTLifer
  • Upvote 1
  • Downvote 3
Cr1028 Grand Master

Cr1028

Posted
Posted
18 minutes ago, GrandGreen said:

Despite the apparent belief of some fans, La Tech should not have any great advantage over NT in recruiting.   Yes, they have won a lot more and send more players to the pros, a statement almost any university can make when comparing themselves to NT.  

What do you think the best recruits are looking for in a college football team to play for??

18 minutes ago, GrandGreen said:

Frankly, if NT can't challenge a program like La Tech which NT has some significant advantages over, than it may be time to just abandon sports at NT.  A ridiculous statement maybe, but no more so than believing that just about any school in the nation has inherent recruiting advantages over NT.  

What advantages are these? Are they advantages to the recruits themselves? Or perceived advantages of our coaching staff because we are located in Texas?

BillySee58 Grand Master

BillySee58

Posted
Posted
10 hours ago, BTG_Fan1 said:

A lot of people here don't seem to understand that for some reason. 

It matters, but your posts seem to indicate that NFL players drafted and history are the end all, be all factors for recruits. Then why did Tee Goree choose us over Colorado, La Tech, and UTSA among others? Or why did Chris Miles choose us over La Tech and Houston? Why did Nate Brooks choose us over La Tech? I could string off a lot of names recruits we beat La Tech and UTSA out for during the Mccarney years.

This isn't some impossible matchup. Nor is UTSA just because they don't have a history of losing. Good recruiters can win these matchups. They have them. Evidence implies we don't. Good recruiters can sell kids on their program even if they have things going against them.

  • Upvote 4
Ben Gooding Newbie

Ben Gooding

Posted
Posted
57 minutes ago, UNTLifer said:

Again, not an accurate statement.

The last 12 signees of the '17 class had no viable options in the football bowl subdivision. The current 5 commits of the '18 class have no viable options in the football bowl subdivision. 

Review - 12+5=17. 

GrandGreen Grand Master

GrandGreen

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, Cr1028 said:

What do you think the best recruits are looking for in a college football team to play for??

What advantages are these? Are they advantages to the recruits themselves? Or perceived advantages of our coaching staff because we are located in Texas?

It is my belief the number one factor in an athlete's decision is conference affiliation.  Of course wrapped up in that is media coverage, national attention, achievement level judged by the team signed with and resource level.   That factor however, is obviously not pertinent to a discussion on recruiting against other CUSA members.  

The number one factor among conference schools and I don't think it is even that debatable is the ability of the coaching staff to recruit.  Another strong factor is recent success level.  Other factors such as location, resources, academics are all secondary to staff's recruiting ability and recent success.

Any half-way knowledgable fan can name positives and negatives of any program.   The key is in the selling not the product.  

What may be an advantage to one recruit maybe just the opposite  to another.   Here are a few advantages NT has IMO over La Tech.

Size of school: NT 37,299 to La Tech 12,371.  Again some may prefer smaller colleges but bigger means in this case much more educational options.

Denton versus Ruston location.   Again it depends on the individual recruit.  Denton in my view is very hard to beat, a smaller town feel in one of the major metropolitan areas in the nation.  Ruston is a  town of 22,000 that is 33 miles from Monroe; a town of 49.000 to the East, and Shreveport 69 miles to the East.  At NT, you are in one of the most attractive job markets in the nation.  

NT is a much more diverse campus than Ruston.  If I was a football recruit I would also note that NT is 53% female, while La Tech is 53% male.  Add in TWU, and it should be much easier to find a date in Denton than Ruston.

Facilities, I would give a substantial edge to NT.  It has been years since I was in Ruston, but I doubt they have closed the gap much. 

Resources, again no contest.   Based on 2014, NT's budget was third in the conference;  La Tech last. 

 

Edited by GrandGreen

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Tell a friend

    Love GoMeanGreen.com? Tell a friend!

  • What's going on Mean Green?

    1. 23

      Mensah Getting $8 Million NIL Deal

      You got it dumbass. Seriously, let’s look at the two situations without inserting race since you felt the need. Mensah is a RS Freshmen that entered the portal stating his price. He didn’t get a degree from Tulane and probably cleared out some basics while there. Mensah may be a great student and may live up to his last name, but his academic success was never mentioned just that he was entering the portal and here is his price Morris was at North Texas as a student that had already earned his degree, the reason he missed spring practice, and a dollar amount was never mentioned regarding his transfer/entering the portal. You chose to read it as a racial observation, not me. You were looking for something that wasn’t there nor considered when I made my comment. I was just adding in to another poster’s comments. Stupid financial decisions are not the result of race but thanks for. Inferring that. Watch the “30 for 30” episode titled “Broke” and it will reveal that it happens to all races. Thanks for being who you are though. I would be shocked if you replied differently.
      UNTLifer in Mean Green Football
    2. 1

      Where are they now? Jason Edwards

      Makes it sound like we are just the minor leagues for these guys. No NT HOF for youuuuuu!
      NT80 in Mean Green Basketball
    3. 94

      Portal players leaving

      I think the fact that he's playing in the bowl game shows 1) he just wants to play and 2) it just shows more of the drive and commitment that's gotten him to where he his. I'm not gonna' fault him for leaving if they aren't rewarding him with a scholarship and especially if it looks like he isn't going to be in the main rotation next year. That feels like "thanks for bailing us out, now go sit down."
      • 1
      • Upvote
      meaniegreenie in Mean Green Football
    4. 47

      Chris Jimmerson

      Too many "player-whisperers" these days telling kids what they should do next in their career. I'd like to see more data about players that left a program for NIL/more playing time on what the return on their investment was. If they had a do-over would they make different decisions or was it really the right move? Do players that change schools every year really have a loyalty to any of them when their playing days are over?
      • 1
      • Upvote
      NT80 in Mean Green Football
    5. 47

      Stop Blaming Athletes and the NCAA for Ruining College Football

      There is a lot of collateral damage in this Portal and NIL era. Fan-withdrawal because of PTSD associated with transferring key players will cause less emotional investment, and eventually less $$ investment in the program they follow. NIL donation requests, ticket surcharges, and pleas from ADs has displaced asking for donations for brick and mortar projects. Player buy-in to a coaching staff and program has been replaced with NIL buy-out of the players.
      NT80 in Mean Green Football

  • Popular Contributors

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      15,505
    • Most Online
      1,865
    Jepper
    Newest Member
    Jepper
    Joined

  • Most Points

    1. 1
      El Paso Eagle
      El Paso Eagle
      170,299
    2. 2
      NT80
      NT80
      137,403
    3. 3
      KingDL1
      KingDL1
      131,325
    4. 4
      greenminer
      greenminer
      123,950
    5. 5
      TheReal_jayD
      TheReal_jayD
      109,004

  • Biggest Gamblers

    1. 1
      EdtheEagle
      EdtheEagle
      26,591,267
    2. 2
      UNTLifer
      UNTLifer
      4,480,984
    3. 3
      untphd
      untphd
      841,161
    4. 4
      flyonthewall
      flyonthewall
      670,422
    5. 5
      3_n_out
      3_n_out
      578,480
    6. 6
      SteaminWillieBeamin
    7. 7
      UNT_FH_FR_YR
      UNT_FH_FR_YR
      454,039
    8. 8
      cousin oliver
      cousin oliver
      448,120
    9. 9
      meangreenfaninno
    10. 10
      South Texas Green

WE BELIEVE IN THE MEAN GREEN!

News

Recruiting

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Please review our full Privacy Policy before using our site.