Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

While it's heavily weighted because of a couple of YUGE lists. It comes out to 4.84 offer per first team conference player. 8 of 25 are single offer guys (32%). Which is high, but likely because of conference. ALSO important, C-USA is a coach driven conference selection if I'm not mistaken, so a lot of these choices could be questioned when looking at the stats/film/production of other players in the conference.

The best players at North Texas and recent all-conference selections like Orr, Trice, etc held multiple FBS offers as well. I would be curious to see the math on the rest of the years as well. Another interesting data point would be 1-offer guys per team that are signed compared to 1-offer guys that make all con. Also a comparison of conferences.

  • Upvote 1
Posted

Good stuff, JayD. One thing that I've tried to emphasize with our recruits and their offer lists is it's important to also take into account their exposure. Aaron Jones didn't get the same amount of college coaches coming through in El Paso that he would've had he played for Hebron over here. Same with the guys we recruit out of East Texas vs the guys from DFW. But it's hard to quantity that through numbers.

Either way, great compilation.

  • Upvote 4
Posted

You need to look at the other side of this.  There are 85 players on scholarship.  Look at the guys who didn't make the all conference team, or played sparingly their entire career.  There are a lot more of those guys on a roster than there are on the all conference team, even on the really good CUSA teams.

Will some of those misses  have multiple offers?  Sure.  Will most of those guys have one offer or at the most two.  Yes.  If a player has only one offer he is much more likely to be "just a guy" instead of an all conference, or even a multi year starter.

That is what the recruiting game is, a game of chances.  There are good bets and bad bets.  If you can win the recruiting battles for the good bets, it is highly likely you will win many games.  If you only get the recruits not many people wanted (bad bets), it is highly likely you will lose many games. 

People can trash talk Dickey all they want, but he and his staff won a lot more of those recruiting battles than anyone else we have had here in a long time.  Did he beat out the high P5 teams like UT and OU?  No.  Did he always win out against lower P5 teams like OSU, TT, Colorado and KSU? No.  But he did win some of those battles, enough to make us dominate a conference.  

Posted
On 12/15/2016 at 8:38 AM, wardly said:

Shows what a good job La. Tech does.

They have a recruiter that lives in the DFW Metroplex, and that's all he does is recruit.  Not sure how many of their top players are from DFW area.

  • Upvote 1
Posted
1 hour ago, TheReal_jayD said:

 

 

Again, how many 0 star recruits were there over that period?  How many were 2 star?  Thousands?  Tens of thousand?

In 2016 here is Rivals star breakdown for the class of 2016:

  • 5 Star: 33
  • 4 Star: 354
  • 3 Star: 1,202
  • 2 Star and lower: 298,000+

Look at Super Bowl 50.  The star breakdown was:

  • 5 Star: 8
  • 4 Star: 18
  • 3 Star: 48
  • 2 Star and lower: 32

 

Now compare those two numbers.  That tells you 5 stars are incredibly over represented, and then representation falls as you get to to each progressive level.

This of course doesn't mean that a low ranked recruit can't be successful, or a highly ranked recruit be a bust, but the chances are much better the higher ranked a recruit is.  

You can tell an individual to strive to be better and play above his ranking, buy you also know that as a class lower ranked classes will definitely perform worse than higher ranked classes.  

 

 

Posted
23 hours ago, Cerebus said:

Again, how many 0 star recruits were there over that period?  How many were 2 star?  Thousands?  Tens of thousand?

In 2016 here is Rivals star breakdown for the class of 2016:

  • 5 Star: 33
  • 4 Star: 354
  • 3 Star: 1,202
  • 2 Star and lower: 298,000+

Look at Super Bowl 50.  The star breakdown was:

  • 5 Star: 8
  • 4 Star: 18
  • 3 Star: 48
  • 2 Star and lower: 32

 

Now compare those two numbers.  That tells you 5 stars are incredibly over represented, and then representation falls as you get to to each progressive level.

This of course doesn't mean that a low ranked recruit can't be successful, or a highly ranked recruit be a bust, but the chances are much better the higher ranked a recruit is.  

You can tell an individual to strive to be better and play above his ranking, buy you also know that as a class lower ranked classes will definitely perform worse than higher ranked classes.  

 

 

Plus 1

I'd like to see the numbers for guys drafted in the first round of the draft and how many stars they had coming out of high school. I am far too lazy to do such research.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Please review our full Privacy Policy before using our site.