Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Is it overreaction to Baylor to the point where all it takes is an accusation for football players to get the boot? Or an assertion that we take accusations seriously and we don't want guys in our program that may have been accused?

Posted
12 hours ago, Cr1028 said:

Is it overreaction to Baylor to the point where all it takes is an accusation for football players to get the boot? Or an assertion that we take accusations seriously and we don't want guys in our program that may have been accused?

Yep. All it takes is an accusation... And a Title IX investigation... And evidence... And the accused changing their stories over time... And more new evidence (including video)... And admission by some involved. They released the full report... and it's pretty damning. I waited until reading everything I could before forming an opinion. 

Thing is, there's a code of conduct. I believe Minnesota suspended some b-ball players last year for something similar, but more consentual. So there really shouldn't be any confusion from these guys that the university might look cross at a train being run on some girl. 

The fact that the remaining players, who didn't have the evidence at the time of their boycott, thought they had ANY cause to boycott just shows how little the "student" part of student-athlete applies these days. 

I hope NIU gets their bowl game. Because F these spoiled tools. 

Posted
7 hours ago, Monkeypox said:

Yep. All it takes is an accusation... And a Title IX investigation... And evidence... And the accused changing their stories over time... And more new evidence (including video)... And admission by some involved. They released the full report... and it's pretty damning. I waited until reading everything I could before forming an opinion. 

Thing is, there's a code of conduct. I believe Minnesota suspended some b-ball players last year for something similar, but more consentual. So there really shouldn't be any confusion from these guys that the university might look cross at a train being run on some girl. 

The fact that the remaining players, who didn't have the evidence at the time of their boycott, thought they had ANY cause to boycott just shows how little the "student" part of student-athlete applies these days. 

I hope NIU gets their bowl game. Because F these spoiled tools. 

Thanks. I hadn't heard any of the facts just hearsay.

Posted
5 minutes ago, Monkeypox said:

There's an 80 page report.... It's... not good. 

University has declined request to reinstate said players, and the team has ended the boycott. Gophers will play Holiday Bowl.

Posted

Army indicated that it received info from the Wake Forrest idiot.  Wondering what might come of that...honor code and all.

  • Upvote 1
  • Downvote 1
Posted (edited)

From what I've read, the concerns are for the 2014 & 2015 games, when the Army staff included a guy who worked at WF with the leaker.

Both games were wins for WF. 

If we got info, then we certainly should come clean. I hope that the only person involved at Army was the guy who is no longer on staff. 

The Honor Code applies to cadets. 

Edited by BeatNavy
  • Upvote 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Please review our full Privacy Policy before using our site.