Jump to content

AT THIS MOMENT: What grade do you give the Littrell hire.  

144 members have voted

  1. 1. AT THIS MOMENT: What grade do you give the Littrell hire.

    • A+
      7
    • A
      21
    • A-
      29
    • B+
      38
    • B
      22
    • B-
      11
    • C+
      7
    • C
      5
    • C-
      2
    • F
      1


Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Now that NSD has occured, it's time to do the third of these poll. 

Please remember:

  • Yes, it's early, too early to give a real grade.  This is more of a snapshot of how the fanbase feels about Littrell AT THIS TIME.
  • Results are anonymous (except to mods).
  • There will be a follow ups after after spring ball.  I'll decide whether to do them in season depending on usage.
  • There is no D, get over it, have a real opinion.
  • There will be graphs and trendlines at a later date. 

 

Here are the results of the first poll:

YNoz5fI.gif

And the second poll:

i9Dcsjb.gif

So vote!

Edited by Cerebus
  • Upvote 1
Posted

I haven't moved my vote, B-. This class, with all things considered (particularly time), I give it a B-. So why not keep the vote for the coach the same. There is one thing will make the grade of this hire go up and one thing will make the grade of this hire go down, W's vs L's. 

Posted
18 minutes ago, Cerebus said:

 

 

 

Signed after press conference. 

Alright!

Given the hand he was dealt, an A.  He's done everything right.

Grading his recruits, a B.  It's still the best class we've had in 5 years.

Posted (edited)
13 minutes ago, Dr. Seuss said:

Alright!

Given the hand he was dealt, an A.  He's done everything right.

Grading his recruits, a B.  It's still the best class we've had in 5 years.

Other than the lack of good QB recruiting, I would have to disagree. Yes 2013 and maybe also 2012 were horrible classes for mac. But 2014 was similar to this (more players, maybe less playmakers at the top) and 2015 was a better class than what we have in 2016 so far. We had 10 players that were rated 247 3*. Personally I think that 2015 class just came too late for Mac (plus all the stubborness etc issues). But this class has not merited praise through the roof yet. It is a lot better than it looked just a week ago. And I guess it is ok, given the late start. But it is heavy on JuCos and not rated any higher than the last two classes. We might be feeling its tiny high school size 3-5 seasons from now.

Edited by outoftown
Posted
Just now, TIgreen01 said:

This also marks the first time you've polled us since the entire coaching staff has been assembled.

 

The second poll had everyone except one coach in place, all the big names were already here.  

Posted (edited)
36 minutes ago, MeanGreenTexan said:

I have to drop yet another notch... and he's lucky it's not 2.   'B' from me.

Same. He got some good players, and a few with decent offer lists, but we didn't really win many head-to-head recruiting battles. Lost Keenen Johnson to Tulsa, Texas State stopped recruiting Hamilton and didn't even send in an LOI, and some other similar examples. Just 9 high school players this class is a risky move, and will likely force him to continue recruiting juco players. Next class is going to be very important.

He's got the timing excuse, and he did a decent job finding those players whose recruitments had cooled, but he's gotta start winning more recruiting battles going forward. Very comparable first class to Mccarney, which isn't bad. Especially if he can actually follow it up with a decent class, unlike Mccarney.

Edited by BillySee58
  • Upvote 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, UNTcrazy727 said:

Why the drop?

QB worries for the future.  Lack of a defensive identity (we have no idea what we're running... assuming a 4-2-5).  The inaugural class so far is still in the bottom half of the conference (I understand the short timeframe and the 1-11 record to overcome).   Not a peep from him regarding Kidsey (this could be directed from RV, but if it's not, it almost seems cowardly).  

Still a B.  Not a failing grade, I don't think he sucks, but falling in line with a curve.   I was very excited at first when he was hired, I think because it resulted in a cleaned house and a ton of optimism.  That optimism is still there, but so is much of the mess. 

  • Upvote 2
  • Downvote 2
Posted (edited)
2 minutes ago, Got5onIt said:

Still at B- for me. William Johnson is a nice surprise. 

It is definitely a player with high upside. But he only counts in my mind if he actually makes it to campus and makes the grades to play. From what I hear that is not a given, but I don't fault coach L for taking him. It is the kind of risk a program like UNT has to take.

Edited by outoftown
Posted
Just now, outoftown said:

It is definitely a player with high upside. But he only counts in my mind if he actually makes it to campus and makes the grades to play. From what I hear that is not a given.

 

Yeah, I was just reading academics may have played a big part in his decommit from Nebraska. I never thought Nebraska was an academically "prestigious" school, superior to NT. Am I wrong?

Posted

i don't see how you guys could be hardsh on the grades.  Littrell had basically less than a month, and Mac left him a bag of .

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love GoMeanGreen.com? Tell a friend!
  • What's going on Mean Green?

    1. 91

      Caponi fired

    2. 91

      Caponi fired

    3. 2

      Odus Mitchell - What Exactly are Too High Standards at UNT?

    4. 91

      Caponi fired

    5. 91

      Caponi fired

  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
    2. 2
      NT80
      NT80
      130
    3. 3
    4. 4
      keith
      keith
      107
    5. 5
      SUMG
      SUMG
      107
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      15,479
    • Most Online
      1,865

    Newest Member
    meangreen0015
    Joined
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Please review our full Privacy Policy before using our site.