Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

5'10" 175 lb running back from Arlington Martin. Also holds offers from Cal, Purdue, Utah State, and SMU. Slowed by injury his senior year, rushed for 35 touchdowns as a junior.

highlights:

http://www.hudl.com/athlete/2594964/nick-smith

 

http://247sports.com/Player/Nic-Smith-33739

http://sports.yahoo.com/usf/football/recruiting/player-Nic-Smith-155263

http://www.scout.com/player/193686-nick-smith

 

Edited by BillySee58
  • Upvote 4
Posted
17 minutes ago, baberuthbomber8 said:

Are we thinking Smith could come in and be the #2 RB for us?

Depends what they do with Ivery. He's a good player too, and probably the number 2 guy. But they could also use him in the slot more. Most of the returners aren't true slot guys (Smiley, Goree, Rutherford, Thompson). Ivery could fit that bill

  • Upvote 1
Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, Cerebus said:

UlO9jgv.jpg

 

Definitely the kind of offer sheet I like to see our recruits have.  A win over a PAC12 and B10 is very good news. 
 

ETA: For all the talking I do about the DaMN State Top 100 it seems that they have decided to discontinue it.  They now do an Area Top 100, and Smith is on that list.  

And the thing is, we didn't even have to beat out those schools directly for him. There are plenty of kids who get offered by schools like that yet have those offers expire. Especially with as early as kids commit now. Doesn't make them any less impressive as a prospect, especially on the CUSA level.

Basically, you can fill your signing class with players who have/had P5 offers and/or 3+ G5 offers but not have to actually beat out P5 schools head-to-head. We should be making a living on that.

Edited by BillySee58
  • Upvote 7
Posted

Wow what a prospect. Strong cutting ability, very quick in small spaces, great agility and balance, and that speed...

I like what I see, and immediately upgrades our RB depth. Should be a contributor early, especially if our plays per game increase significantly.

  • Upvote 2
Posted

I find it interesting to compare him to Willie Ivery.  About the same size at 175, although Ivery is an inch shorter at 5-9.  Ivery was also a three star on 247 but did not have the offer list that Smith did with Toledo being his biggest.  It would be fun to see Smith and Ivery on the field at the same time.

Posted
7 minutes ago, Harry said:

I find it interesting to compare him to Willie Ivery.  About the same size at 175, although Ivery is an inch shorter at 5-9.  Ivery was also a three star on 247 but did not have the offer list that Smith did with Toledo being his biggest.  It would be fun to see Smith and Ivery on the field at the same time.

Ivery is a different back, and am surprised that he was actually heavier (5'8", 183lbs sparq) than Nic out of HS because of Nic's style.

Ivery is versatile, but is better served playing in open space. Sort of like a Shane Vereen type, who can catch passes very well.

Nic plays more of a between-the-tackles style, with better cutting and lateral agility.

  • Upvote 1
Posted
16 hours ago, Aldo said:

Ivery is versatile, but is better served playing in open space. Sort of like a Shane Vereen type, who can catch passes very well.

Nic plays more of a between-the-tackles style, with better cutting and lateral agility.

Nic plays between the tackles because the offense they ran calls for it.

Both guys are dangerous in space. Speed and elusiveness. Id say Smith has a bit more elusiveness while Ivery has more straight speed.

  • Upvote 2
Posted
On February 1, 2016 at 7:21 PM, BillySee58 said:

And the thing is, we didn't even have to beat out those schools directly for him. There are plenty of kids who get offered by schools like that yet have those offers expire. Especially with as early as kids commit now. Doesn't make them any less impressive as a prospect, especially on the CUSA level.

Basically, you can fill your signing class with players who have/had P5 offers and/or 3+ G5 offers but not have to actually beat out P5 schools head-to-head. We should be making a living on that.

BINGO! BINGO! Also kids that want to play closer to home.

Posted
1 hour ago, Mean_Green09 said:

Id say Smith has a bit more elusiveness while Ivery has more straight speed.

^ This is why I like Ivery better in space than in between the tackles. Good stop-start, but runs around guys more than makes them miss.

Posted

As of this post I have not sorted through our signed LOIs.

If we can get a QB in here to run the offense, I think Ivery/Smith/Wilson should be running circles around CUSA.  An incredible trio of offensive weaponry.

Of course, wins will require a defense, too.  *crossing fingers*

Posted
11 minutes ago, greenminer said:

As of this post I have not sorted through our signed LOIs.

If we can get a QB in here to run the offense, I think Ivery/Smith/Wilson should be running circles around CUSA.  An incredible trio of offensive weaponry.

Of course, wins will require a defense, too.  *crossing fingers*

If Morris is accurate and smart with the ball, his arm will open up running opportunities for these guys.   If not, then DaMarcus' wheels in a zone-read will also open up opportunities.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Please review our full Privacy Policy before using our site.