Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
8 minutes ago, Andrew said:

Running out of time here. No bench and no 3 point shooters going to hurt us. I always wonder how every other team we play against can knock down 3 after 3 after 3.

Pretty simple, they recruit kids who don't take 3 years to develop a jump shot. They can already shoot.  They stay in the program, and don't get run off after 1-2 seasons. 

  • Upvote 2
  • Downvote 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, GMG24 said:

Pretty simple, they recruit kids who don't take 3 years to develop a jump shot. They can already shoot.  They stay in the program, and don't get run off after 1-2 seasons. 

I just find it hard to believe these guys cannot shoot. Shooting even when covered is easy to me. I suck at dribbling but that's why these guys play d1 ball. They should be able to do it all. I think they need to have the freedom to take the shots and not be punished for a miss.

  • Upvote 2
  • Downvote 6
Posted
1 minute ago, NT1978 said:

Turn out the lights

The dumpsters burning.

I blame poor free throw shooting. We've only hit 9 in this game (as of 1:59 to play). 

Improve there, and maybe we'd have won this game and maybe be over .500.

/mostthreads

Posted
Just now, TheTastyGreek said:

I blame poor free throw shooting. We've only hit 9 in this game (as of 1:59 to play). 

We are a perfect 9-9 from the stripe.  Taking care of the ball? No. 17 turnovers so far in the game.

  • Upvote 2
Posted
Just now, UNTFan23 said:

We are a perfect 9-9 from the stripe.  Taking care of the ball? No. 17 turnovers so far in the game.

I realized it might not make sense, so I edited while you were typing (apparently) to make my intent more clear. 

Also, what if we'd shot at 300% instead of just 100%? 

We'd have won this game, that's what. 

Gotta work on these things in practice. 

Posted
24 minutes ago, Andrew said:

I just find it hard to believe these guys cannot shoot. Shooting even when covered is easy to me. I suck at dribbling but that's why these guys play d1 ball. They should be able to do it all. I think they need to have the freedom to take the shots and not be punished for a miss.

You sir are becoming delusional. The speed of a game you play at vs the speed of game these guys play at is like Jr. high vs Varsity. We didn't recruit well enough to be competitive, in year 4. We have no pure shooters... Not even deckie, he's streaky at best. 

  • Upvote 3
  • Downvote 1
Posted
11 minutes ago, UNTFan23 said:

Didn't score the last 5:06.

That's sad ?

1 minute ago, GMG24 said:

You sir are becoming delusional. The speed of a game you play at vs the speed of game these guys play at is like Jr. high vs Varsity. We didn't recruit well enough to be competitive, in year 4. We have no pure shooters... Not even deckie, he's streaky at best. 

Ward was brought in as a shooter and Anefiok and Harris were shooters. Who were our shooters in the past? Thomspon, Davis, Watson, and Davis again. We had some really good pure shooters but others guys who were not recruited as shooters would contribute and make 3's. It's like Watson said about a month ago when talking to Dave. We need to just start shooting more. He said we don't pull it enough and pass it to much. He said there was a game where JJ said I want you to go and pull it every chance you have. He said JJ essentially told them to shoot the ball as much as you can. Benford doesn't seem fond of shooting unless your 100% wide open. 

  • Upvote 1
  • Downvote 3
Posted
32 minutes ago, Andrew said:

I just find it hard to believe these guys cannot shoot. Shooting even when covered is easy to me. I suck at dribbling but that's why these guys play d1 ball. They should be able to do it all. I think they need to have the freedom to take the shots and not be punished for a miss.

I hear you. I haven't played in years but I can shoot from anywhere on the court.

Now making them is another thing.

  • Upvote 5
Posted
6 minutes ago, Andrew said:

That's sad ?

Ward was brought in as a shooter and Anefiok and Harris were shooters. Who were our shooters in the past? Thomspon, Davis, Watson, and Davis again. We had some really good pure shooters but others guys who were not recruited as shooters would contribute and make 3's. It's like Watson said about a month ago when talking to Dave. We need to just start shooting more. He said we don't pull it enough and pass it to much. He said there was a game where JJ said I want you to go and pull it every chance you have. He said JJ essentially told them to shoot the ball as much as you can. Benford doesn't seem fond of shooting unless your 100% wide open. 

So Benford can't evaluate talent? Harris nut job, ward bench player at best, and anefiok... Well I'll just leave it at that. Time to see the door. 

  • Upvote 2
Posted
1 hour ago, Andrew said:

Running out of time here. No bench and no 3 point shooters going to hurt us. I always wonder how every other team we play against can knock down 3 after 3 after 3.

yeah... UAB really torched us from beyond the arc with their 7-25 3 point shooting...

 

 

  • Upvote 3
Posted
44 minutes ago, GMG24 said:

So Benford can't evaluate talent? Harris nut job, ward bench player at best, and anefiok... Well I'll just leave it at that. Time to see the door. 

I think he is decent at evaluatin talent, but doesn't let them play their game. Except for Reese and Combs. He had let them loose. Reese could turn over the ball 20 times and stay in the game. Anybody else and they would be benched. It's actually not a bad thing though because it's clear Reese and Combs are comfortable out there. Nobody else is.

2 minutes ago, golfingomez said:

yeah... UAB really torched us from beyond the arc with their 7-25 3 point shooting...

 

 

The differential from behind the ARC was 15. Good to know if we ever lose by 15 or less to you that's a close game and no big deal. They shot poorly from deep and still continued to shoot and make more than we did. Even percentage wise they shot better than us from 3. But again 15 points is no big deal I guess.

  • Upvote 1
  • Downvote 5
Posted

Rob Schneider?  

 

 

When's bumford getting the can? 

 

 

I could honestly take 24 more months of Benford if RV was shown the door tonight. We suck. At. Everything....

 

And...believe it or not......

 

There are STILL real human beings that support this gaggle F of an athletic department. It's truly is unbelievable. Astonishing, actually. 

  • Upvote 4
Posted (edited)
6 hours ago, All About UNT said:

Oh look...we lost a basketball game

Could have told you that without looking...

The saddest thing of the Bemford era on the basketball forum has been much much more Andrew and much much less Tasty, and no NT03 at all.

I remember when conversations in these threads were smart.

Just another terrible consequence of letting everyone's friend Rick Villarreal hang around and collect a check.

Edited by UNT90
  • Upvote 3
  • Downvote 2
Posted
9 hours ago, Andrew said:

I think he is decent at evaluatin talent, but doesn't let them play their game. Except for Reese and Combs. He had let them loose. Reese could turn over the ball 20 times and stay in the game. Anybody else and they would be benched. It's actually not a bad thing though because it's clear Reese and Combs are comfortable out there. Nobody else is.

The differential from behind the ARC was 15. Good to know if we ever lose by 15 or less to you that's a close game and no big deal. They shot poorly from deep and still continued to shoot and make more than we did. Even percentage wise they shot better than us from 3. But again 15 points is no big deal I guess.

Were you on O.J.'s defense team?

  • Upvote 1
  • Downvote 1
Posted

After giving it some thought, I agree with Andrew.  If Benford would just turn the guys loose and let them score more points than the other team we'd win more games.  

Perhaps he just hasn't thought of that brilliant strategy yet

  • Upvote 3
  • Downvote 3

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Please review our full Privacy Policy before using our site.