Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Like someone said before.  If Chico is able to put a couple W's on the board, it will look good on his resume.  It's 5 years too late, we need to change the whole staff. 

^

Seems like a great guy, but I don't see him being able to do the most important thing in CFB very well...Recruit. And if we aren't implementing the triple option anytine soon our next hire has to put an uptick in recruiting. 

  • Upvote 1
  • Downvote 1
Posted (edited)

If Chico gets the job, I want to see big name staff surrounding him and top tier recruiters.

I like Chico a lot, honestly. Always have.

But at this point, RV knows he has to clean house and make a big splash, so it would be doubtful he stays.

I wouldn't be upset if Chico got it, but I do like other candidates.

The players really respect him, wouldn't be surprised to reel off Ws against MUTS and UTEP, make it close against LaTech. 

And the important part--we aren't as bad this year as SMU was last year.

Edited by Ryan Munthe
  • Upvote 4
  • Downvote 1
Posted

F It let's go beat La Tech in their house again!  They barely beat UTKFC and we are pumped and playing with energy.

GMG

  • Upvote 4
Posted

If Chico gets the job then he will most likely keep a majority of the current staff and that is a major problem. We cannot expect to move forward if we keep anyone from the current staff save Perry and Patrick.

  • Upvote 1
Posted

If he were to get his wish and Chico was hired, I would hope that Canales would hire him as a GA or safeties coach. He and Orr were a big reason the '13 defense was so damn good.

tap the brakes on safety coach. GA absolutely, but this guy screwed up plenty and took garbage angles often.  His passion and energy would be an asset but only as a GA. He has a lot to learn, and we saw what happened the last time we brought in under qualified position coaches and coordinators.

  • Upvote 1
Posted

We won one game.. I like Chico, I like his energy I like that the players like him. That being said we won one game lets not start second guessing is he or isn't he. My preference currently is a big name that has recruiting ties.. But I would certainly take Chico over the loser we are probably going to try and hire..

  • Upvote 2
Posted

Like someone said before.  If Chico is able to put a couple W's on the board, it will look good on his resume.  It's 5 years too late, we need to change the whole staff. 

Glad to see some sanity in this thread.

If he were to get his wish and Chico was hired, I would hope that Canales would hire him as a GA or safeties coach. He and Orr were a big reason the '13 defense was so damn good.

A guy who has never been a grad assistant or coached at any level.

And you want to put him in charge of the secondary?...

just...

  • Upvote 3
  • Downvote 2
Posted

If Chico gets the job, I want to see big name staff surrounding him and top tier recruiters.

I like Chico a lot, honestly. Always have.

But at this point, RV knows he has to clean house and make a big splash, so it would be doubtful he stays.

I wouldn't be upset if Chico got it, but I do like other candidates.

The players really respect him, wouldn't be surprised to reel off Ws against MUTS and UTEP, make it close against LaTech. 

And the important part--we aren't as bad this year as SMU was last year.

100% this

If he wins at MUTS & UTEP, then he would be 3-4 this year and 2-3 last time around when he almost took out Kansas St. and the MUTS.

If he had won one of those games and gone 3-2, he might have been hired 5years ago.

if he can get 2 more wins it would mean he took 2 dead in the water teams that were a combined 1-11 and finished 5-7 with exactly the same players. 

Winning 2 more games this year might be a stretch.  Beating UTEP is likely.

Posted (edited)

Honestly, I don't think there's anything wrong with hiring Chico.  There are better coaches and better recruiters out there, sure.  But, let's be honest - they aren't coming here.  The school's reputation aside, we simply can't pay them enough.  I don't want a big school coach in here anyway - I'm not sold that they can come down here and work without the safety nets, resources, and momentum that big schools have.

If you're not going to get a turnkey coach, the next best thing is a guy who is reasonably qualified, hungry, and knows the landscape.  Say what you want about Chico, but he at least fulfills those three criteria for me.  After being here for 5 years, he knows the warts and challenges, and he still wants it.  That says something.

Ultimately, I don't think much will change unless we happen to get lucky and catch lightning in a bottle.  Even then, history has shown that sustaining that success is too hard to reasonably expect it.  I'd say just let Chico run with it for a few seasons and see how he does.  Maybe it'll work out, maybe it won't.  It will be a crapshoot no matter who we hire - at least with Chico there's less lead-in time.

#damnwithfaintpraise

Edited by mad dog
  • Upvote 1
  • Downvote 1
Posted (edited)

Honestly, I don't think there's anything wrong with hiring Chico.  There are better coaches and better recruiters out there, sure.  But, let's be honest - they aren't coming here.  The school's reputation aside, we simply can't pay them enough.

UNT pays the fourth-highest salary in CUSA, and that might go up for the next hire. We have a good stadium and are located in DFW, the largest metropolitan area in the South and the No. 5 TV market in the U.S. These are all selling points.

There's no reason to believe, as you appear to, that nobody good would want this job.

Edited by rcade
  • Upvote 3
Posted

I like Chico's enthusiasm and connection with the players, but I would have to see what the list of real alternatives are.  I don't see any reason why he would not be given the opportunity to interview if he was interested.  He seems like he has at least earned the right to an interview.  I would not say the same for Cosh.  If nothing else, it gives him a chance to polish his HC presentation skills for his next opportunity.

Posted

Chico has already told the AD that he is not interested in the job.

I believe he said he wouldn't campaign for it like last time. That's a little different than not interested.

  • Upvote 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love GoMeanGreen.com? Tell a friend!
  • What's going on Mean Green?

    1. 135

      Utah State (11/29/24)

    2. 135

      Utah State (11/29/24)

    3. 135

      Utah State (11/29/24)

    4. 135

      Utah State (11/29/24)

    5. 28

      Cotton, Vice And Mason

  • Popular Contributors

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      15,483
    • Most Online
      1,865

    Newest Member
    meangreen0015
    Joined
  • Most Points

    1. 1
    2. 2
      NT80
      NT80
      131,388
    3. 3
      KingDL1
      KingDL1
      128,735
    4. 4
      greenminer
      greenminer
      120,210
    5. 5
      TheReal_jayD
      TheReal_jayD
      105,189
  • Biggest Gamblers

    1. 1
      EdtheEagle
      EdtheEagle
      26,589,381
    2. 2
      UNTLifer
      UNTLifer
      4,156,819
    3. 3
      untphd
      untphd
      780,113
    4. 4
      flyonthewall
      flyonthewall
      670,422
    5. 5
      3_n_out
      3_n_out
      578,480
    6. 6
    7. 7
    8. 8
    9. 9
    10. 10
      outoftown
      outoftown
      314,541
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Please review our full Privacy Policy before using our site.