No More FCS For a Texas FBS Team

[UNTexas]

Didn't RV say the reason we didn't get the 6 promised home games didn't happen because Northern Arizona backed out? I listened to his interview and I seem to recall Northern Arizona being part of his excuses.

It doesn't really matter. Actions are louder than words and his words are pretty meaningless when schedules are concerned. 

Edited September 17, 2015 by UNTexas

[oldguystudent]

We should be signing up teams for one and ones, everyone is going to want us for a homecoming game.  Kansas and New Mexico should be up for it.

I want to say we were the homecoming team for at least four of our six road games in 2013.  I see no reason why we won't be returning to that model in the very near future.

[MeanGreenTexan]

Didn't RV say the reason we didn't get the 6 promised home games didn't happen because Northern Arizona backed out? I listened to his interview and I seem to recall Northern Arizona being part of his excuses.

It doesn't really matter. Actions are louder than words and his words are pretty meaningless when schedules are concerned. 

NAU backout was to blame for the week 1 bye, not the 5 home games... that was Tulsa leaving C-USA.  Get your excuse teams straight.

[HoustonEagle]

Didn't RV say the reason we didn't get the 6 promised home games didn't happen because Northern Arizona backed out? I listened to his interview and I seem to recall Northern Arizona being part of his excuses.

It doesn't really matter. Actions are louder than words and his words are pretty meaningless when schedules are concerned. 

That was his excuse for why we started the season with a bye.  Portland state was booked instead but was only available later in the schedule.  That is my understanding at least.  One could say that bye may have cost us the SMU game, amongst other things.  I would not argue the point. 

Edited September 17, 2015 by HoustonEagle

[UNT90]

At least the whole NAU thing makes sense, unlike the Tulsa thing.

Except that it doesn't.

At all.