Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I understand that the main purpose in moving to a more "uptempo" offense this year is to get off more plays.

I wonder, if in  this particular game it is the best strategy.  It will be an interesting chess match on Saturday.

We have always had a potent running game.  We have some terrific running backs and depth.  It seems to me a ground attack that eats up the clock and keeps Matt Davis off the field could bode well.  It also would give our defense more rest and make adjustments since they haven't yet played a real game and been in real game situations.  If we get our offense going and can run the ball, I have no problem with a long drive that burns an entire quarter up leaving Davis on the sidelines.

Now of course, if we were to fall behind, the uptempo would be a good strategy and could serve us well giving us more plays and opportunities to score and catch up. 

It just seems to me that using the uptempo has a place, I just wonder if it is in our best interests in this particular game.

Posted

I would personally eat clock while keeping the tempo concept. Rush to the line and eat clock and the threat of actually going tempo is always in play. I would tempo at opportune times and tempo to the line to eat clock. I expect to see just that tbh. 

Posted

Of course we are going to see up-tempo. What we don't want to see is what happened to Texas this past weekend. Running the same offense at a quicker pace. Not getting your best players enough touches. 

I see what you're getting at about running uptempo against a team that does it better. We can't afford to have quick 3 and outs. 

What I hope we see in Saturday is McNulty distributing the ball the play makers in space and a healthy does of the backs. Wilson in particular needs 15-20 touches. Wear them down. 

  • Upvote 2
Posted

You can still run the ball using an uptempo.   I expect to see a LOT of Wilson.

SMU did this very thing to Baylor in the 2nd quarter last week.  
Baylor only had the ball for a few minutes in the 2nd quarter.  Of course, Baylor also had SMU stopped several times, but were hurt by dumb penalties to keep the drives going.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Tell a friend

    Love GoMeanGreen.com? Tell a friend!
  • What's going on Mean Green?

    1. 9

      Army Game TV Ratings (number of viewers)

    2. 15

      UTSA Game Uniforms

    3. 9

      ***OFFICIAL UNT vs. UTSA IN-GAME DISCUSSION***

    4. 15

      UTSA Game Uniforms

    5. 15

      UTSA Game Uniforms

  • Popular Contributors

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      15,477
    • Most Online
      1,865

    Newest Member
    meangreen0015
    Joined
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Please review our full Privacy Policy before using our site.