Jump to content

Top candidates to replace Coach Pete

Harry

By Harry
in Mean Green Basketball

 Share

Recommended Posts

FirefightnRick Proficient

FirefightnRick

Posted
Posted (edited)

http://www.sfajacks.com/sports/w-baskbl/mtt/brandon_schneider_640085.html

Brandon Schneider,...Stephen F. Austin.

He's young, around 45 years old.

4 straight 20 plus win seasons.

Went 306-72 at Emplria State and a D II National Championship in 2010.

11 of 12 years ESU went to the NCAA.

Had two 30 plus seasons, nine 20 plus seasons.

Is a Canyon, Texas native, which is home to some of greatest women's high school basketball talent in the state.

Rick

Edited by FirefightnRick
Link to comment
Share on other sites
FirefightnRick Proficient

FirefightnRick

Posted
Posted

http://www.sfajacks.com/sports/w-baskbl/mtt/brandon_schneider_640085.html

Brandon Schneider,...Stephen F. Austin.

He's young, around 45 years old.

4 straight 20 plus win seasons.

Went 306-72 at Emplria State and a D II National Championship in 2010.

11 of 12 years ESU went to the NCAA.

Had two 30 plus seasons, nine 20 plus seasons.

Is a Canyon, Texas native, which is home to some of greatest women's high school basketball talent in the state.

Rick

Per greenpedler on the MnG board, Schneider is currently making around $120K a year, or about $50K less than Peterson was making.

Rick

Link to comment
Share on other sites
UNTFan23 Community Regular

UNTFan23

Posted
Posted

The topic of this thread really should be NT FANS' Top candidates to replace Coach Pete because who the AD chooses to interview versus who the fan base wants to see interviewed is never the same.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
UNTFan23 Community Regular

UNTFan23

Posted
Posted

Oh, just posting here to complain about people posting in this thread, right?

Rick

The way hires always seem to work as follows:

1. Fans put together their list of prospects and post it on their favorite fan message board

2. AD puts his/her list of prospects

3. Interviews begin

3b. Rumors start to fly as to who is/is not getting interviewed

4. Fans become angry when some of their people aren't the ones getting interviewed

5. Coach is hired

5b. Some fans are hurt that their guy/girl didn't get the job and want to rake the AD of the coals because they feel their coach should have gotten at least an interview

Link to comment
Share on other sites
UNT90 Newbie

UNT90

Posted
Posted

5b. Some fans are hurt that their guy/girl didn't get the job and want to rake the AD of the coals because they feel their coach should have gotten at least an interview

This would be about 1,456 on the list of things to rake the AD over the coals for.

Yes, sadly, there are that many things...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
UNTFan23 Community Regular

UNTFan23

Posted
Posted

This would be about 1,456 on the list of things to rake the AD over the coals for.

Yes, sadly, there are that many things...

It still happens. Look at how the last hire for the women's basketball program went and how some people wanted now HC at Marshall to be hired here. It'll happen again like the sun sets in the west.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
UNT90 Newbie

UNT90

Posted
Posted

It still happens. Look at how the last hire for the women's basketball program went and how some people wanted now HC at Marshall to be hired here. It'll happen again like the sun sets in the west.

So, those fans were right? Yes, I'm sure that will lead them to question the person that made the wrong hire when he makes yet another hire they feel is wrong.

Because they have been right more often than the guy doing the hiring...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
UNTFan23 Community Regular

UNTFan23

Posted
Posted

So, those fans were right? Yes, I'm sure that will lead them to question the person that made the wrong hire when he makes yet another hire they feel is wrong.

Because they have been right more often than the guy doing the hiring...

It's impossible to say Daniels would have done any different here versus Marshall.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
GrandGreen Grand Master

GrandGreen

Posted
Posted (edited)

God forbid than we should hire a North Texas alum to coach the women.

God forbid that NT hires a good qualified coach. Mitchell was a great player for NT, that does not mean that she is head coach material at this time. Just check the records of coaches that have returned to head their college team. Without a lot of analysis, I would guess their success rate is at best equal to any other hire. They may have a greater loyalty to the school, but that doesn't help if they are not a successful coach.

Edited by GrandGreen
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
FirefightnRick Proficient

FirefightnRick

Posted
Posted

So, those fans were right? Yes, I'm sure that will lead them to question the person that made the wrong hire when he makes yet another hire they feel is wrong.

Because they have been right more often than the guy doing the hiring...

Remember when Stephens was hired? I and maybe one other questioned it for numerous reasons before she ever coached a game here and we caught hell about it. I admit, I suckered in and supported the Dodge hire. I thought he would bring in some good talent, and in that respect he did just that. But Stephens and the process in which she was hired sucked and I pegged it as such from the beginning, and it was.

Back to the scope of the thread,...

I've yet to see mention or hear of a better candidate that we certainly can afford than Schneider,...a guy who has been an extremely successful head coach since he was 25 years old and is still young and vibrant and still winning. But he's not from the ACC or the SEC or the Big Ten. So there's no way in hell we'll even bring him in to Denton for a formal interview after SFA is done with their post season, let alone hire him. It just makes too much sense.

Rick

  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
FirefightnRick Proficient

FirefightnRick

Posted
Posted

It's impossible to say Daniels would have done any different here versus Marshall.

He won at a tough place before and he grew their fanbase while doing it. In fact, he's winning now in an even tougher place than here due to having less talent in state to recruit from. He had a better upside to him and would have been much more affordable than Petersen.

Rick

Link to comment
Share on other sites
UNTFan23 Community Regular

UNTFan23

Posted
Posted (edited)

Right. Same conference. Same competition. I mean, worlds apart.

But he did have a distinct advantage in ADs.

He won at a tough place before and he grew their fanbase while doing it. In fact, he's winning now in an even tougher place than here due to having less talent in state to recruit from. He had a better upside to him and would have been much more affordable than Petersen.

Rick

Why do people insist on using such flawed logic??? Just because he does well somewhere else doesn't mean he will do well here. Is his success at other schools an indicator he might do well here? Yes but by no means is it a sure thing. Until he coaches here and deals with the circumstances he is dealt with here will anyone ever really know whether he's a success here. Until he coaches here he is really nothing more then a paper dragon.

It happens all the time where someone is hired with good credentials/references for a job and it just doesn't work out.

Edited by UNTFan23
  • Upvote 1
  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
UNT90 Newbie

UNT90

Posted
Posted

Why do people insist on using such flawed logic??? Just because he does well somewhere else doesn't mean he will do well here. Is his success at other schools an indicator he might do well here? Yes but by no means is it a sure thing. Until he coaches here and deals with the circumstances he is dealt with here will anyone ever really know whether he's a success here. Until he coaches here he is really nothing more then a paper dragon.

It happens all the time where someone is hired with good credentials/references for a job and it just doesn't work out.

You are correct, but the fact that he is succeeding with a team in our conference is an indicator of what may have been.

Of course, he would have the disadvantage of the current AD situation to deal with. ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Tell a friend

    Love GoMeanGreen.com? Tell a friend!

  • What's going on Mean Green?

    1. 10

      McGill scored in the 2nd Quarter.

      The McGill non-TD was 50/50. With my green glasses on, the ball broke the goal line more or less as his knee hit. The problem was that they didn’t call it a TD and therefore harder to call the TD on replay when that close. The real problem is our inability to get TDs when in the redzone, particularly short yardage. Can’t run for one yard and it’s pathetic. Should never need to pass from the one yard line and if we do it should be some kind of play action misdirection to a block and release TE. The play calling in general was terrible this game. The decision making (on sides kick) was even worse. On a related note, the non-fumble and the PI call were ridiculous. I can sort-of, kind-of see the PI call because it was a bang bang play and refs are human, but the fumble was a fumble and they got it wrong live and on replay. The AD needs to file a protest to the league. That ref should be suspended.
      97and03 in Mean Green Football
    2. 10

      McGill scored in the 2nd Quarter.

      So was the radio play-by-play. Wish there was a video replay for me to see this. I also wish there was better checks-and-balances. In the NFL, can't a team submit a replay of a call to the NFL office for review, even if it doesn't mean a change in the final score? At least there would be some transparency and accountability. Based on the radio play by play, you would think that giving McGill the TD was a no-brainer, and the game might have ended up very differently. An option offense playing from behind is very different from one playing to keep a lead.. (granted, it was still early in our game)
      greenminer in Mean Green Football
    3. 4

      No moral victories

      We knew this 3-game stretch of Memphis, Tulane and Army would be tough. We lost by 8, 8 and 11 points. We are another year away (with better players and coaches).
      NT80 in Mean Green Football
    4. 4

      Any way to see the replay?

      https://www.espn.com/watch/player/_/id/f4417568-64b4-4d98-b22b-bbb1ef1a84c3
      greenminer in Mean Green Football
    5. 46

      Fire the OC. The defense showed up.

      3 times within 15 yards and walking away with 0 points. There is nothing about that that is on the defense. Emmitt is right.
      greenminer in Mean Green Football

  • Popular Contributors

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      15,473
    • Most Online
      1,865
    BleedGreen4
    Newest Member
    BleedGreen4
    Joined

WE BELIEVE IN THE MEAN GREEN!

News

Recruiting

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Please review our full Privacy Policy before using our site.