Jump to content

2015 CUSA Men's Basketball Tournament

greenminer

By greenminer
in Mean Green Basketball

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 137
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Andrew
Andrew

Our side of the bracket does not look to bad. We could very possibly make it to the conference finals. We lucked out with our draw. We avoided the likes of ODU, UTSA, And UTEP who have had our number

techdawg88
techdawg88

no, but i don't understand the point of conferences doing tournaments when most of the time the best team doesn't usually win it

UNT90
UNT90

But, but, but we had a 5 game win streak, gosh darnit! That means EVERYTHING has changed!!

Gibbz Enthusiast

Gibbz

Posted
Posted

no, but i don't understand the point of conferences doing tournaments when most of the time the best team doesn't usually win it

Because if you're from one of the weaker conferences it's a test to see if you're really that good. For instance, if KU lost in the Big 12 tourney it couldn't be compared to y'all losing in CUSA. La Tech knew they had to take care of business and couldn't do it.

A team good enough to be an automatic Big Dance type squad would've shredded through this tournament. It was handed to La Tech on a platter with ODU and UTEP both getting dumped.

  • Upvote 3
THOR Proficient

THOR

Posted
Posted

and if this was UNT we were talking about you'd be sore too

Nope...only sore from the ass reaming our ad gives us with shiat hires and schedules...

  • Upvote 1
UNT90 Newbie

UNT90

Posted
Posted

No, but the elbow they threw to clear that space...

I don't know about you, but I'm not over that no call

Best drive block I'd seen in a long time.

That moving screen was full body, not just an elbow.

UNTLifer Grand Master

UNTLifer

Posted
Posted

Best drive block I'd seen in a long time.

That moving screen was full body, not just an elbow.

No kidding, but still talking about this now makes us sore losers, doesn't it?

UNT90 Newbie

UNT90

Posted
Posted

No kidding, but still talking about this now makes us sore losers, doesn't it?

Not really. It's not like we are demanding anything out of it, just reliving a terrible non-call in our basketball history.

  • Upvote 1
CMJ Grand Master

CMJ

Posted
Posted (edited)

Honestly, I think I am probably more upset about the WKU game the next season. We didn't have any bad call against us, but a cascade of missed chances in the final minute of that game. It was there for the taking though....the three the Toppers hit on a scrambled play with just over a minute to go to up four still haunts me. If we get the ball in that situation, we're probably scoring in transition to go up four....instead we're down one. At that point all the pressure is on the Toppers, and even if they do score they probably have to start fouling. Five point swing there....

We never retook the lead.

**I had to re-look exactly how the end of game situation played out....was even more painful than I recalled.

Edited by CMJ
MCMLXXX Mentor

MCMLXXX

Posted
Posted

Those who say LSU will get in before ODU must not know that ODU beat LSU on a neutral court by 9 earlier in the season. I will admit that LSU beat WVU and Arkansas and I know it was earlier in the season but I think that win should account for something. ODU had only one non conference loss and that was to Illinois State who beat Wichita State in the MVC semis.

CMJ Grand Master

CMJ

Posted
Posted

Those who say LSU will get in before ODU must not know that ODU beat LSU on a neutral court by 9 earlier in the season. I will admit that LSU beat WVU and Arkansas and I know it was earlier in the season but I think that win should account for something. ODU had only one non conference loss and that was to Illinois State who beat Wichita State in the MVC semis.

LSU has a 13-5 record against the RPI top 100. That will be hard for the committee to leave off even with the terrible losses they have.

Ben Gooding Newbie

Ben Gooding

Posted
Posted

RPI/BPI is a joke. It's ALL based off of opinion. The RPI's and BPI's are calculated through opinion of how good of a win was over a team that someone has to form an opinion about OR how bad a loss was to a team that also someone had to form an opinion about. These opinion makers are going to put their bread and butter (P5 athletics) ahead of mid-majors/G5 schools 99/100 times. They are presumed better every single season and there for they have more wins over "tougher" competition. And after decades of being presumed better and being told you're better, some programs actually rise up and become truly better. But, don't let these RPI rankings or "wins over RPI Top 100" fool you. It's a system created for and by the P5 to ensure P5 supremacy.

  • Downvote 2
CMJ Grand Master

CMJ

Posted
Posted

RPI/BPI is a joke. It's ALL based off of opinion. The RPI's and BPI's are calculated through opinion of how good of a win was over a team that someone has to form an opinion about OR how bad a loss was to a team that also someone had to form an opinion about. These opinion makers are going to put their bread and butter (P5 athletics) ahead of mid-majors/G5 schools 99/100 times. They are presumed better every single season and there for they have more wins over "tougher" competition. And after decades of being presumed better and being told you're better, some programs actually rise up and become truly better. But, don't let these RPI rankings or "wins over RPI Top 100" fool you. It's a system created for and by the P5 to ensure P5 supremacy.

RPI is actually a pretty standard mathematical model; no opinion involved at all? It may not be a totally realistic ranking as far as how good it measures all schools, but it's one of the best things there is to remove eye test bias. I remember about 10-12 years ago when everyone said the MVC gamed the system (I think they got 4 schools in). That is actually what led the committee to lessen its importance in the stated factor of selecting the field.

  • Upvote 3
TheTastyGreek Collaborator

TheTastyGreek

Posted
Posted

RPI is actually a pretty standard mathematical model; no opinion involved at all? It may not be a totally realistic ranking as far as how good it measures all schools, but it's one of the best things there is to remove eye test bias. I remember about 10-12 years ago when everyone said the MVC gamed the system (I think they got 4 schools in). That is actually what led the committee to lessen its importance in the stated factor of selecting the field.

Exactly. RPI has ZERO opinion involved, at least beyond setting the formula, none of which involves subjective opinion based on anything that could favor the power conferences.

If you stripped the names off of every team and gave me 3 pieces of information (winner, loser, home/away/neutral location) for every game played this season, the RPI rankings I came up with would be identical to what exists now.

oldguystudent Newbie

oldguystudent

Posted
Posted

RPI is actually a pretty standard mathematical model; no opinion involved at all? It may not be a totally realistic ranking as far as how good it measures all schools, but it's one of the best things there is to remove eye test bias. I remember about 10-12 years ago when everyone said the MVC gamed the system (I think they got 4 schools in). That is actually what led the committee to lessen its importance in the stated factor of selecting the field.

I know in baseball, the SEC exploits the RPI by playing nothing OOC except the best teams in the most horrific conferences. That way, they get to rack up opponent wins and go .500 in conference, which lands them all with top 5 RPIs because "Our conference is soooo harrrrdddd!" I think they revamped it to make road wins count more than home wins because those schools very, very rarely leave home for OOC opponents.

I don't follow how the basketball RPI works, but it's got to be different because you really do see some marquee matchups early in the season.

Ben Gooding Newbie

Ben Gooding

Posted
Posted

Birmingham is crushing MTSU right now.

This is good and bad for CUSA. The bad being that our CUSA tourney champ will be a 15 loss team, but good being that this very well solidifies CUSA being a 2 bid conference, hopefully.
  • Downvote 1
CMJ Grand Master

CMJ

Posted
Posted

This is good and bad for CUSA. The bad being that our CUSA tourney champ will be a 15 loss team, but good being that this very well solidifies CUSA being a 2 bid conference, hopefully.

I am going to be stunned if CUSA gets another team in.

MeanGreenFury Rookie

MeanGreenFury

Posted
Posted

This is good and bad for CUSA. The bad being that our CUSA tourney champ will be a 15 loss team, but good being that this very well solidifies CUSA being a 2 bid conference, hopefully.

CUSA is going to have one team in as a probable 15/16 seed. Getting two teams in is a pipe dream.

ChristopherRyanWilkes Enthusiast

ChristopherRyanWilkes

Posted
Posted

This is good and bad for CUSA. The bad being that our CUSA tourney champ will be a 15 loss team, but good being that this very well solidifies CUSA being a 2 bid conference, hopefully.

We will get 1 team in. For 2 bids we needed LaTech to lose in the final at least.

Andrew Grand Master

Andrew

Posted
Posted

CUSA is going to have one team in as a probable 15/16 seed. Getting two teams in is a pipe dream.

The announcers of the game said UAB could go as high as a 12 seed, but Lunardi has them at a 15 seed. I do not think they will get lower than a 14 seed but there are still a lot of games to be played which will affect seeding.

  • Upvote 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Tell a friend

    Love GoMeanGreen.com? Tell a friend!

  • What's going on Mean Green?

    1. 63

      Caponi fired

      AD, as in Athletic Department (ie HC Eric Morris),, not AD, as in Athletic Director... SPORTS: Mean Green Athletics Department fires defensive coordinator Matt Caponi
      NT80 in Mean Green Football
    2. 6

      A Game To Keep An Eye On

      Oh and don’t look now but SMU is on top of the ACC, filling their stadium in week 12 and also playing for a CFP spot. Good thing we didn’t have to play them in conference this year. We were fortunate to have the weak part of our schedule front-loaded that generated some modest excitement, but it was apparently all smoke and mirrors. On the bright side, we still have Temple to play. Yay us.
      keith in Mean Green Football
    3. 63

      Caponi fired

      All the more reason to bring him in to be the OC. He KNOWS what defenses will do. BRILLIANT!!
      Rudy in Mean Green Football
    4. 63

      Caponi fired

      I believe that is how a majority of changes are made at the FBS level = Fan Base and Donor pressure! Who else are you trying to lure to watch games and give to the program?
      NT80 in Mean Green Football
    5. 48

      Why Support this Program?….Seriously!?

      I don’t know why we are nitpicking the legacy of the only coach in 50 years that has put multiple team trophies in our trophy case. If you omit coaches who earned Hall of Fame status after leaving here you are left with Odus Mitchell and Dickey as the only coaches to ever “dominate” any conference for any length of time. Now looking back through history I am even more frustrated that in 2004 it appears we never tried to get Jerry Moore to come back to UNT. But come to think of it, maybe it is karma. A program that raves about Hayden Fry every opportunity rarely honor Odus Mitchell properly. A 20 year tenure with 10 conference titles. We should be playing on Odus Mitchell Field inside (DATCU, Apogee, or whatever corporation that wants cough up naming rights money) stadium.
      • 1
      • Puking Eagle
      Meangreen Fight in Mean Green Football

  • Popular Contributors

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      15,478
    • Most Online
      1,865
    meangreen0015
    Newest Member
    meangreen0015
    Joined

WE BELIEVE IN THE MEAN GREEN!

News

Recruiting

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Please review our full Privacy Policy before using our site.