Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

To:

Faculty, staff and students,

I would like to share with you an announcement I am making this afternoon so you are aware of some important next steps in our strategic planning process.

A common theme we have heard in the many meetings I have had with UAB's major constituency groups on and off campus, including faculty, staff, students, alumni and other supporters, is a desire to have an independent financial firm evaluate the numbers that served as a basis for our decisions in the Athletic Department.

I have listened, and I agree that if an independent financial review is needed to verify the credibility of our numbers, then that is what we should do.

To that end, we have formed a committee representative of our constituents to select a firm to review our initial report.

This new committee will be led by National Alumni Society President Wes Smith. Other committee members are:

Shannon Ealy - Interim Athletic Director

Chad Epps - President of the Faculty Senate

Don Hire - UAB Athletics, Champions Club

Harold Jones - Head of our athletic director search committee and also our former lead in NCAA certification

Steve Mitchell - A former UAB athlete

Anjali Wagle - President of the Student Government Association

Once a firm is selected, we will ask that a report be completed within 90 days. While this report is being developed, we will continue to have dialogue with all stakeholders on this important matter.

I'm sure a question is: Are you bringing back football? Only after an independent review of the numbers will we have the ability to have a credible and constructive dialogue about moving forward. It is important to note that we will not field a football team in 2015.

I want to thank everyone for their engagement and suggestions in this process. I hope this decision is well received as a positive step to moving the UAB community forward.

Very sincerely,

Ray L. Watts

President

View the full article

  • Downvote 1
Posted

what a crock, if they want to be transparent there would be an independent audit, not one filled with UA members that want UAB to go away, which includes the AD POS

  • Upvote 1
Posted

They may also be trying to stay in CUSA and delay having to find a new home.

That's an interesting angle I hadn't thought of. Any rumors that the conference is about to give them the boot? I mean, they probably should leave without football. I've lost my taste for any kind of hybrid football/nonfootball conference.

Posted

That's an interesting angle I hadn't thought of. Any rumors that the conference is about to give them the boot? I mean, they probably should leave without football. I've lost my taste for any kind of hybrid football/nonfootball conference.

Part of conference membership is that you must field a football team. Banowsky has expressed a desire to keep them, but the schools have not agreed with that. That was the word on the street not long after the announcement.

Posted

Part of conference membership is that you must field a football team. Banowsky has expressed a desire to keep them, but the schools have not agreed with that. That was the word on the street not long after the announcement.

A decade or so ago CUSA kicked out Charlotte for not fielding a football team. I'm not sure how the other schools would feel about an exception now. Plus having an odd number of teams is a nightmare for scheduling and adding a "football only" school doesn't have a good record of success.

I don't think they get to stay although they MIGHT stay an additional year.

  • Upvote 1
Posted

A decade or so ago CUSA kicked out Charlotte for not fielding a football team. I'm not sure how the other schools would feel about an exception now. Plus having an odd number of teams is a nightmare for scheduling and adding a "football only" school doesn't have a good record of success.

I don't think they get to stay although they MIGHT stay an additional year.

I agree, unlikely that the other schools want to keep them around and a football only school is not going to happen. I think the extra year is what they are looking for.

Posted

They may also be trying to stay in CUSA and delay having to find a new home.

Except that letter states they will not have football in 2015.

And, like you said, having football is a requirement for CUSA membership.

Posted

Except that letter states they will not have football in 2015.

And, like you said, having football is a requirement for CUSA membership.

But if they are "investigating" returning the program, they can try to use that as a bargaining chip to stay in for one more season, giving them time to find a new home while actually investigating nothing.

Posted

Well Hawaii has football membership only in the mwc. Is there a football taker out there? Start with BYU hit the academies then a strong sbc or logical sbc like asu lala or nmsu. GMG

  • Upvote 1
Posted

Well Hawaii has football membership only in the mwc. Is there a football taker out there? Start with BYU hit the academies then a strong sbc or logical sbc like asu lala or nmsu. GMG

BYU is an obvious no and already has a psuedo scheduling alliance with the AAC. Air Force turned the Big 12 down, so they definitely won't leave the MWC for CUSA, Navy is joining the AAC this summer, Army doesn't want to go back to CUSA.

So that leaves ULL, Arkansas State or South Alabama.

  • Downvote 4
Posted

Speaking of UAB, here's a funny note. They just extended their basketball coach, Jerod Haase, out for two more years at $525k per season. Here's the kicker--in the contract, it explicitly says that he cannot make public any criticism of UAB school administrators.

If we think UNT has no clue on how to run athletics, UAB is much worse than us...

  • Upvote 2
Posted

BYU is an obvious no and already has a psuedo scheduling alliance with the AAC. Air Force turned the Big 12 down, so they definitely won't leave the MWC for CUSA, Navy is joining the AAC this summer, Army doesn't want to go back to CUSA.

So that leaves ULL, Arkansas State or South Alabama.

This guy is funny. As if somehow the AAC is any better than CUSA. Lol

Posted

BYU is an obvious no and already has a psuedo scheduling alliance with the AAC. Air Force turned the Big 12 down, so they definitely won't leave the MWC for CUSA, Navy is joining the AAC this summer, Army doesn't want to go back to CUSA.

So that leaves ULL, Arkansas State or South Alabama.

I could see BYU going to the Big 12. Army will be limited to jumping into conferences because I don't see them going into the same conference with Navy or Air Force. But who the hell knows with the climate in college football these days.
Posted (edited)

....and in a related matter...........http://espn.go.com/college-football/story/_/id/12171249/uab-faculty-senate-votes-no-confidence-president

BIRMINGHAM, Ala. -- The Faculty Senate of the University of Alabama at Birmingham on Thursday voted no-confidence in President Ray Watts following his decision to kill the school's football program, which had its best record in a decade last fall.

Here's my question. If the same thing happened here (shutting down the FB program after our 9-4 season) would our faculty have done the same thing? Or would they have given him a standing ovation/

Edited by SilverEagle
Posted

When the "who would we take" conversation comes up, why does no one else mention Georgia Southern? They've come along really quickly and if they keep it up could be the next midmajor powerhouse. Between wins and close calls against P5 teams, they've given like 4 or 5 schools a collective heart attack in the last 2 years.

  • Downvote 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Please review our full Privacy Policy before using our site.