Jump to content

UNT lands UAB safety transfer Jakii Moore

Brett Vito

By Brett Vito
in UNT Football Recruiting

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 76
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Caw Caw
Caw Caw

Now everyone will stop bitching that we didn't pursue a UAB transfer.

meangreen15
meangreen15

My HSO: I think this defense would be better if we could get JJ Watt

FirefightnRick
FirefightnRick

Ok, so? Rick

Harry Grand Master

Harry

Posted
Posted

HUDL film is impressive. Here's the deal, he's a legit 6-1 and close to 200 with good speed. He's an immediate special team contributor. We go from being weak at safety depth to it being a strength with Gray and Kishawn.

Like this signing a lot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
BillySee58 Grand Master

BillySee58

Posted
Posted (edited)

I would assume it would be because he redshirted. The same reason you don't see Brock Berglund on a 2012 UNT roster.

By that logic our roster shouldn't have had all of our transfers (Jackson twins, Epps, Rice) and Tee Goree, O'Keeron Rutherford, Chris Miles, Brandon Garner, TJ Tauaalo, etc, who we are all redshirting. If you sign a JUCO player then he's eligible to play the next season (2014 at UAB for Moore). He wouldn't just be taken off the roster because the coaching staff chose to redshirt him. Edited by BillySee58
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mean Green 93-98 Grand Master

Mean Green 93-98

Posted
Posted

By that logic our roster shouldn't have had all of our transfers (Jackson twins, Epps, Rice) and Tee Goree, O'Keeron Rutherford, Chris Miles, Brandon Garner, TJ Tauaalo, etc, who we are all redshirting. If you sign a JUCO player then he's eligible to play the next season (2014 at UAB for Moore). He wouldn't just be taken off the roster because the coaching staff chose to redshirt him.

By what logic? I never said that redshirts are never listed on a roster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
UNT86 Mentor

UNT86

Posted
Posted

I think it is probably a by-product of weaker classes his first two years.

It had to be hard to recruit coming off the Dodge teams and even after 5 wins his first season.

I think last year's class was solid, but I see lots of schools filling in the gaps where they missed with JUCO kids.

JUCO kids don't bother me, as long as they can actually play.

  • Upvote 1
  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
BillySee58 Grand Master

BillySee58

Posted
Posted

By what logic? I never said that redshirts are never listed on a roster.

My point was that just because you're redshirting doesn't mean you wouldn't be on the roster. If Moore signed with UAB in the spring, and joined the team for fall camp then he would've been on the roster and wouldn't have been taken off just because the staff chose to redshirt him. Berglund's situation was different, although I don't remember him not being on the roster in 2012, but I'll take your word for it.

But like I said, him redshirting is not a good explanation for why he was never listed on the roster. And I don't think he was taken off the roster, because even if he was you can still access a removed player's official site profile from google. Or at least you usually can.

  • Upvote 1
  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
emmitt01 Grand Master

emmitt01

Posted
Posted

I don't know that it's desperation, but I do think it's an admission that the talent needed to win in 2015 was not on the roster.

A few questions:

-Is bringing in another safety an indication that Schilleci isn't seen as "starter material"?

-It seems our O-line next season will be heavy on transfers and JUCO players...didn't we sign a bunch of kids out of high school several years back? Where is the development?

-Are running back and TE the only positions where we didn't bring in a transfer or JUCO?

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
greenit Newbie

greenit

Posted
Posted (edited)

I don't think we were in danger of winning 10 games last season, but I definitely think we could have won 6 or 7 games with a better QB situation. The defense was good enough to win 6/7, but the QB play was very bad.

Between the new QBs added, and maturity of the existing crew, I am confident that we will at least take a small step forward at QB next season.

I think the attrition from the 2011 and 2012 classes required that we add Juco/Xfers in order to provide competition at certain positions. For example, we really only have McClain and Shilleci returning at safety. They may be the guys, but adding some experience Jucos will ensure that we at least have some competition at both positions next spring/fall.

@UNT90

Here is a HS DT that has been committed to the Mean Green for a while:

http://247sports.com/Player/RD-Wegmann-76049

Edited by greenit
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Ben Gooding Newbie

Ben Gooding

Posted
Posted

As stated in someone else's comment, I don't think this is desperation per say. I do think it is obvious that Mac is not recruiting HS talent at the level he wants to for whatever reason. It's easy to point to the Dodge Era, but Mac is entering his 5th season. I am an advocate of going JUCO. We need more size, speed, strength and just sheer talent on this roster. Mac understands that and is going JUCO to try to fix it. Mac doesn't like doing this, most old school coaches (aside from Snyder) don't. But this is necessary and I think Mac knows if he displays another 4-8 football team next season he is going to lose a lot of fans that are still "siding" with him. I commend Mac for doing this, he is going out of his comfort zone to correct former recruiting blunders. I think (hope) the transfers currently on the roster and JUCO's he has hauled in can play. GMG.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
FirefightnRick Proficient

FirefightnRick

Posted
Posted

I don't think we were in danger of winning 10 games last season, but I definitely think we could have won 6 or 7 games with a better QB situation. The defense was good enough to win 6/7, but the QB play was very bad.

Between the new QBs added, and maturity of the existing crew, I am confident that we will at least take a small step forward at QB next season.

I think the attrition from the 2011 and 2012 classes required that we add Juco/Xfers in order to provide competition at certain positions. For example, we really only have McClain and Shilleci returning at safety. They may be the guys, but adding some experience Jucos will ensure that we at least have some competition at both positions next spring/fall.

@UNT90

Here is a HS DT that has been committed to the Mean Green for a while:

http://247sports.com/Player/RD-Wegmann-76049

He's referring to TOP DT recruits. There's hundreds of available 2 star/non-rated 264 LB DT's out there. We need a future game changer.

Rick

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Tell a friend

    Love GoMeanGreen.com? Tell a friend!

  • What's going on Mean Green?

    1. 10

      McGill scored in the 2nd Quarter.

      The McGill non-TD was 50/50. With my green glasses on, the ball broke the goal line more or less as his knee hit. The problem was that they didn’t call it a TD and therefore harder to call the TD on replay when that close. The real problem is our inability to get TDs when in the redzone, particularly short yardage. Can’t run for one yard and it’s pathetic. Should never need to pass from the one yard line and if we do it should be some kind of play action misdirection to a block and release TE. The play calling in general was terrible this game. The decision making (on sides kick) was even worse. On a related note, the non-fumble and the PI call were ridiculous. I can sort-of, kind-of see the PI call because it was a bang bang play and refs are human, but the fumble was a fumble and they got it wrong live and on replay. The AD needs to file a protest to the league. That ref should be suspended.
      97and03 in Mean Green Football
    2. 10

      McGill scored in the 2nd Quarter.

      So was the radio play-by-play. Wish there was a video replay for me to see this. I also wish there was better checks-and-balances. In the NFL, can't a team submit a replay of a call to the NFL office for review, even if it doesn't mean a change in the final score? At least there would be some transparency and accountability. Based on the radio play by play, you would think that giving McGill the TD was a no-brainer, and the game might have ended up very differently. An option offense playing from behind is very different from one playing to keep a lead.. (granted, it was still early in our game)
      greenminer in Mean Green Football
    3. 4

      No moral victories

      We knew this 3-game stretch of Memphis, Tulane and Army would be tough. We lost by 8, 8 and 11 points. We are another year away (with better players and coaches).
      NT80 in Mean Green Football
    4. 4

      Any way to see the replay?

      https://www.espn.com/watch/player/_/id/f4417568-64b4-4d98-b22b-bbb1ef1a84c3
      greenminer in Mean Green Football
    5. 46

      Fire the OC. The defense showed up.

      3 times within 15 yards and walking away with 0 points. There is nothing about that that is on the defense. Emmitt is right.
      greenminer in Mean Green Football

  • Popular Contributors

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      15,473
    • Most Online
      1,865
    BleedGreen4
    Newest Member
    BleedGreen4
    Joined

WE BELIEVE IN THE MEAN GREEN!

News

Recruiting

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Please review our full Privacy Policy before using our site.