The original point of this thread had nothing to do with the question of whether or not this will be paid for or not. I have no doubt that with the debt service and donations, etc. that the stadium will be paid for in full. The question here revolves around whether or not we will see any increase to the operating budget for the athletic department. There was some talk of a significant increase to the amount of money available to fund coaching salaries, specifically for football.
Early on in this process certain people brought out the notion that we would see large increases to operating budget (in the millions) since only half of the new money coming in from student fees would be in the 6 million range. The thought was that say 3 million of that would go to pay the debt payments and around half of that would go to increasing the operating budget of the athletic department, a huge boost that would affect the quality of coaching staff that we could hire.
Now I see that checkfacts is challenging that and I have not seen anything (still) that can argue that he is incorrect in that assumption. Maybe we will never know the answer but I was under the impression that some people had some information to argue against check facts. All I'm seeing right now is people are throwing checkfacts under the bus. I don't see any reason behind it. What am I missing? IF we just don't know then let's say - we just don't know.
If that is the case then all we can say is that checkfacts is just speculating based on a hunch, and so are we.