Regardless of how you feel about the crime, the law has very specific guidelines about how we use our guns. And I believe there are situations where you don't shoot to kill, you shoot to immobilize. I don't know all the details, but I gather a few things this guy has against him that you need to consider: 1) they were running away. He chased them to shoot...and kill 2) there was no evidence that they were a threat to his safety. I think the law says you can NOT shoot unless you know they are a threat? It might not matter if they're in your house, but this is different when on someone else's lawn. The bolded statement is a blatant, knee-jerk over generalization. This guy was hoping to get these guys from the get-go. I wonder if you'd be speaking differently if this situation played out exactly the same with a couple of 120 lb females instead.