NorthTexasWeLove

They did rush the ball better than us and stopped the run with more success. At the LOS they are better, or showed to be better in comparison to us last year. Going off the top of my head, their back went 16 for 84. And Jeff went 14 for 39. Something along those lines. They soundly beat us last year. The tosses to Sutton were the daggers.

Good add. I like his length. But if he's coming in as a DE, he's probably coming in to play our buck/jack/star or whatever this staff is calling the position. He needs a good RS year to put on 15-20 pounds as well.

I mean going by your definition, it's exactly 'must' win. -We should win -I insist that we win -There must be a way we win this game -We shouldn't overlook them

Best news I've read all day.

I think UTSA's performance vs Arizona State on Saturday will give us a good indication on what kind of team they are fielding this year. As for UAB, I am only concerned with them because we have to go to Birmingham. But I just don't fear them. A bad Florida team manhandled them last year and Ohio spanked them in the bowl game. If our defense shows any kind of improvement like many are predicting, we'll beat them going away.

No. We just have to take our beatings when they come around. We are just North Texas after all.

Not understanding your strategy. Most know that the money and/or TV contracts sit in the lap of UT and ATM. Littrell may very well get a 5 million dollar a year offer from another school. But outside of pointing out the obvious, what is your angle? We are who we are and we're slowly climbing the ladder of relevance. Let's just keep it at that.

Sounds about right. I predicted 500 short of a sellout, it may be capacity crowd + standing room. Another reason to add to it being a must win game.

I have to imagine there will at least be 3 or 4k walk ups. To boot the usual 8-10k students vs SMU/big game.

Very nice. What section

This concedes to the division of 'leauges' and I don't like it. The DMN I believe started doing just this last year. 1. TCU 2. UT 3. A&M 4. Tech (4 and all three 5's are very close) 5. SMU/UNT/UH (opportunity on Sat to separate ourselves and solidify ourselves in this echelon) 6. UTSA 7. Baylor 8-the rest. Who cares

Haha, roll with it

It looks outdated because it's horrible placement on the helmet. From an aesthetic standpoint, it looks like they are more concerned about the wing tips being flush to each other in the back rather than the placement on the side of the helmet. The SOW needs to be slightly largely and placed more centered mass on the helmet.

Yeah, it sounded like you were sexy whispering to us.

It's ruining America...Might even be the downfall of the entire nation as we know it.

Overlooked them.

So, we're the most truthful?

My wife brings in a little 6-8 inch handbag with her with a wrist holder on it. It easily carries all of her essentials that she needs.

Yeah...Our cheer"leaders" should definitely take up their namesake better.

I don't care. Didn't read it. LaTech, our conference mate and a team that we beat took SMU to the woodshed on national television. No excuses. Win the game.

That's fantastic and a great feather in Wren's hat. Bravo to all involved.

No, there is no way. If SMU comes out in man and stubbornly stays in it, we will be in for an enjoyable game.

A "little less" talent at WR? You mean way less talent at WR, I'm sure. If the plan is go to man, Mason Fine will rip off runs on ya and throw for 300+ in the process. If they go man, UNT will bust them out of that early.

Your UNT Mean Green takes this one to the tune of 41-31.