Jump to content

NorthTexasWeLove

Members
  • Posts

    5,448
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    34
  • Points

    82,245 [ Donate ]

Everything posted by NorthTexasWeLove

  1. And correct me if I'm wrong, but the HC over there makes 425k. Talk about culture and value. That's big time. Coaches clearly go there to WIN. Not to fleece the constituents and try to double down on contract extensions and raises, but to WIN.
  2. Parking, of the laundry list of issues, is by far the lowest hanging fruit. Of course he hit on that hard. Does the AD not have mock games several weeks leading into the home opener and then sporadic spot checks throughout the season each week? I mean, on a serious note, wth else do they have to do? It's, with little debate, the most important part of their in-season job(s).
  3. Meh. That's announced. Probably sub-10k in attendance
  4. I feel like we let shit like this just slip through the cracks all the time. Like, we don't need to cut deals, we're freaking North Texas.
  5. Not good. They just have to win, but we know how that goes over there. I like Monroe, their campus and their little stadium. It's a shame.
  6. Was it though?
  7. X,XXX They're def gonna try to keep that 1 close to the vest.
  8. Right when the alignment info dropped I started saying that immediately. There are football serious schools with serious administrations and fans littered in that conference. If I'm ULM I'm white-knuckling and doing whatever it takes to hang on. Same for a few others, but especially them.
  9. I don't care one way or another. But it's hundreds, maybe in the thousands, of identical content.
  10. I hope you don't own any horses.
  11. I didn't take you as a Gen Z-er. You seem older.
  12. Meh. I enjoy what I do. However, I knew a SJW such as yourself would come sprinting to make a comment on my post. Enjoy.
  13. Hey, HEY!, We're a university for everyone!!!!! You have a 1.4 HS gpa, cmon buddy. You make a 14/800 on your SAT/ACT, cmon buddy. You want rainbow streaks in your man pony tail, cmon buddy. You want to be an 80 pound overweight feminist wearing belly shirts, cmon buddy. You want to wear high heels and a wig and fake advertise yourself as a woman to men, cmon buddy. It's what we do. It's who we are. One love.
  14. No one is hiding under any skirts. I pointed your first little paragraph out in this topic discussion. We get mauled by SMU. SMU then proceeds to get into bare knuckled fist fights with other teams that are very similar to us in talent and the perceptual pecking order. I think playing SMU is good for both brands if our brand could ever rise to the occasion and be competitive. We haven't been, at all. So, this series has been way more advantageous for them. Now, we have to play them in conference every year. Yay us.
  15. Then yall should probably stop losing to the Tulsas, ECUs and Navys of the world. And better start stomping the Texas States, Astates of the world. You guys stuff us into our locker and make us like it every year. And squeek by or lose to the aforementioned, every year.
  16. He's into something, maybe. But that won't be a strong conference. Marginally better than the current AAC, and that might be a reach. That is the absolute bottom dwellers of the PAC. If they played a proper home/home schedule vs a G5 schedule I'm not sure their record would drasticslly improve in comparison to their normal PAC records, even if at all.
  17. I'm not hyping up any game. Not to be too lady like, but using transitive properties, SMU plays exceptionally well vs UNT most years.
  18. But they have always been out recruiting us. I'm sure it makes a smidgen of difference, but those same P5 rejects were going to fall to them or a program like them anyway. Face value, sure. But they'll struggle and/or get beat by X, Y and Z teams as usual.
  19. I am not buying that we can't compete with SMU. They view us as a must win and we piss down our leg every year we play them. Last year they lost to Tulsa, UH, Memphis and got obliterated by a good Cincy team. They beat LaTech by a couple points. Year before: The week before SMU played us they beat TXST by a TD then turned around and dropped 65 on us. Let Navy hang around (and Navy hadn't been very good lately). Lost to both Tulsa (again) and ECU. 2019: Yeah, they won 10 games. Smoked us, of course. Eked out a W vs Arkansas State. Barely beat Tulsa. Barely beat ECU. Lost to Navy. Spanked by FAU. 2018: Beat us by almost 4 TD's and turned around and lost 7 games. I could go on and on. They are not that good. They (their coaching staffs over the years) clearly hype up this game to their players. They play hard and fast vs us and they view us as a can't lose, as stated. Also as stated, we fill up our cleats with urine. I'm just not buying it.
  20. Good for him and good for the athletic department.
  21. Yes, because Seth freaking Littrell = Tom Landry.
  22. Only thing the guy was saying is 6 yards per attempt is dog shit regardless of who you're comparing it to. And, he's right, it is.
  23. Money, football money, needs to be poured into that basketball program immediately. We are wasting so many resources over in that football stadium. I really appreciate what GM has done, but I feel like he's coaching his butt off and squeezing every ounce of talent out of his players. It just feels like a 0 margin for error style of basketball and I have this feeling it could easily faulter.
  24. Our HUGE problem vs SMU since Littrell has been here is the big play vs our defense. Every year there is seemingly 2 or 3 1-2 play drives that breaks the game wide open. Now, granted, 10 points won't and shouldn't ever win you a game. But our inability to bottle up and then rally to their playmakers is our main issue.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Please review our full Privacy Policy before using our site.