Some have suggested that taking money away from football implies disbanding football. That is not the case. Snipping some budgetary funds from football and reallocation of these funds to basketball changes the 66-21 score how? 66-14? 73-21? It's sort of whatever. It would have minimal to no bearing on our pretty bad attendance, our competiveness is historically subpar. So, I doubt it would move the needle one way or another. Frankly, if the athletic department did it and didn't tell anyone, no one would even know as far as the football product is concerned. Given we operate at or close to a deficit, it's a moot point in regard to football funding everything. What truly funds most things are our student fees, not football. It's an easy, believable, and cheap excuse.