DentonLurker

I hope UH challenges this and tells the NFL to go kick rocks.

I’m so glad my job doesn’t rely on the decision making of 18-22 year olds

He seems like a good receiver, but with this offense, that's the position I worry the least about.

UTSA already gets $24M a year from student fees and school funds; that accounts for 63% of their revenue.

Nobody made that argument but of course you know that.

That’s not really the point, but okay…

No way. Anytime you have someone who supervises others, you get rid of the supervisor if you get to a place where you can’t trust them to make hiring and firing decisions. And I am a really long way from getting rid of Morris. He may make a change or he may not. My guess is he won’t this year. They have personnel upgrades that need to be made in the off-season, and I think they’ll play out next year and re-evaluate. Also, it’s not like they took over a top 50 defense.

I’ll go with recruits and their families are going to be realistic about how challenging it is to produce results in a completely new defensive scheme with players not recruited for that scheme or used to playing in that scheme.

Jason?

I’m with you, man. Scoring the touchdown there is a must. I’m not messing around.

This is the best offense in the AAC and that’s with them stinking up the place for several halves during these games.

Doesn’t matter. The average college student doesn’t even know what G5 means. All they see is college athletes getting paid and then people asking them to pay for those same athletes to play.

I was just about to say that

Our ability to play second halves the way we do makes it pretty clear to me that our strength and conditioning staff is one of the highlights of this coaching staff.

Can this team just start playing a “first half” against the scout team in the IPF before the game starts?

Y’all should stop with the Bean stuff. He’s not a good quarterback.

15-32, 218 yds, 0 TD, 2 INT

This isn't surprising to me at all. With the rising cost of attending college/NIL/etc, I don't blame students one bit for pushing back on mandatory athletic fees. Part of me feels like Athletics has even brought this on themselves. With athletes getting NIL deals and whatnot, if I'm a non-athlete, why would I vote to pay for you to get to play when you may already be getting paid through NIL?

Seriously, what is this in reference to?

Seems like a weird combo of throwback helmet with modern jersey. Missed opportunity for a cool throwback jersey.

Voertman’s

I don't get this logic at all. If an athlete makes our team better NOW, I don't care where they end up 2 years down the road. You can't go out and stop recruiting good athletes because they have offers from other programs and you're scared they might leave your program in a year or two.

This looks like something that would be really cool! I love that it ties in two games and that it requires students to come in the building for their attendance to count

I watched the Memphis game Saturday and their defense is awful. If our offense doesn’t waste a half, I expect us to score a lot of points. I’ll say Mean Green 45 - Memphis 31

I mean, I guess it depends on who you can plug into the coordinator role. In your Arkansas example, it’s tough to see how they become a better football team for making that move when looking at the interim OC’s credentials. We’ll see if it pays off for them. Feels like it probably won’t make them any better this year looking at it from a high level glance. With that said, I wouldn’t hold my breath that Coach Morris makes a change at DC anytime soon. He likes the scheme. At this point, they know they don’t have the right personnel for it to be its best version this year but they feel like getting the players used to running it helps them in the long run.