NT93

Love it!!!🤣🤣🤣

I’ll probably find myself hoping ND wins. I at least like Marcus Freeman. Wonder if they would be the first national champion to lose to a “G5” or equivalent?

4 QB’s in the portal??? Very unlikely they would have even had one on the roster for the bowl.

I love it. I’m for anything that throws a wrench in the farce known as “NIL”

Definitely need a rule to stop the faking injuries, but I don’t know if I like sitting the remainder of the drive. My big objection is that “rest of the drive” could be one play or 15 plays. Maybe have to miss a certain number of plays? I don’t know, but there needs to be something. Too bad coaches can’t just play by the rules instead of manipulating things to their advantage. Actually, this isn’t really manipulating the rules, it’s outright cheating because you know there’s no consequences.

I hope it doesn’t have a similar effect on the basketball team.

I don’t mean this as disagreeing with you, just as a thought. I think a big draw for TxSt fans is that this is new for them and they are excited about the direction of their program. In five years if they’re still going 7-5 and playing UNT in the First Responders Bowl, there won’t be near the excitement in San Marcos.

No doubt it will never happen. Just wishful thinking.

If Congress wants to help, they should require the NFL and NBA to fund their own minor league systems and let college athletes go back to being amateurs.

For some reason this reminds me of the Yogi Berra quote, “Nobody goes there anymore because it’s too crowded.”

I thought they only had 5 days after the bowl game to enter.

In fairness, his losses are to teams with a combined conference record of 68-19 over the past two seasons. We’ve gotten a bad draw of playing the top 3-4 teams in conference both seasons in the AAC. Not really disagreeing with you, just pointing out we’ve played all the best teams aside from not playing Navy this year. I haven’t looked at other team’s schedules, but I’m pretty sure we’ve had the hardest conference schedule the past two years.

The Michigan loss is the best thing to happen to them. They seem laser focused and tough to beat if they can maintain that focus for 2 more games.

I get that and I agree. I think there needs to be less reviews (or at least less time per review), but I also think it’s ridiculous to say, “They obviously missed that call, but it’s not reviewable.” I mean they spend 5 minutes reviewing a spot to move the ball 6”, but they don’t review the two 15 yard penalties I mentioned? Hell, refs mis-spot the ball a little bit all the time, but we’re not reviewing that (thank goodness). Replay should be used only for clearly egregious calls. Honestly, I don’t think I’d be opposed to only reviewing at game speed. If you can’t tell in game speed, it’s not egregious. On top of that, look how many times they go to review and still miss the call. There were about 3-4 at least in our game vs TxSt. Bottom line: Replay needs A LOT of tweaking.

There needs to be review of blatant missed calls on pass interference and roughing the passer. The whole point of instant replay is to get the calls correct. They’ll slow a video down frame by frame to determine when a player’s knee went down or to see when/if a player was out of bounds, but they can’t review a call that is obviously wrong in real time? That makes no sense.